karlwunsch: Why not making it available on Linux as well?
My only open source is firefox which I thought was great until they went with yahoo browser and it is a mess. Constantly crashing and difficult to tell advertized items from actual search results.
Rob Sims: DPReview Staff - possible suggestion:When you do these in future, could you also take the same photo with a standard high-end stock camera (eg. Nikon D810 / Canon 5D m3) so we can have something to compare it to? It surely wouldn't double the workload as you're already there taking the photo, but would kill half the negative comments that seem to appear after each of these real-world samples are published.
Disclaimer: This was already mentioned somewhere below, but I think the original comment was meant in jest, despite it actually being a good suggestion.
No one would buy a Canon if DP did that.
Photo Pete: Not surprised dSLR focus accuracy is so hit and miss. How on earth can a precision optical instrument be designed so poorly that the AF module is able to be installed in a visibly different location on each model.
That's not bad quality control, it's bad design.
If most manufacturers are like Sony, they test with a 50mm...not sure if different lenses make a difference with focus accuracy but all my lenses use different calibration.
cgarrard: How many more are tired of this subject like me? :)
Carl, are you always above it all?
yesman12: For a web site that claims to be impartial, I am surprised to see a headline which fundamentally sounds like a apologist for Nikon. Also, since you uncovered the problem in your testing, why was it until now that you decided to present the issue with a full page?
Given a string of similar issues from recent Nikon cameras, If DP were really impartial, perhaps the headline should read "Nikon Flare issue: Is there a pattern of QC problems"
All the cameras with bion x cpu, Richard commented on as a major fault. Not how it worked but its name. Of course, I threw that in there to show that Dp will look for problems when none exists in cameras that are not their favorite brands.
Read R. Butlers"s comments on the Sony cameras's reviews.
Sony is called out by DP because they don't like the naming of the processor (Bionz x).
I can't understand why DP would justify their high score for the 750 with explaining that the total recall of a their favorite camera is not justified.
Now this is what I call a eye opener, thanks Scott for the raw conversions.
Wow, love those shadow lifting
David V: Honestly, these were disappointing samples, IMO. I think Sony is making the most impressive bodies out there, but their lenses do little to exploit that goodness.
I have been itching to pull the trigger on an A7II to add a FF mirrorless camera to my lineup but I think I will stick with just my Fuji X-System cameras/lenses for now.
I am interested to see what Sony does to follow up to the RX1R, which is a fantastic camera.
Fuji last generation Sony sensor is quite low resolution to modern sensors and consequently are kind to fuji lenses.
I thought the pictures were quite good, demonstrating DR that Canon shooters can only dream about. The only quibble I have is they seem a little bit underexposed.
Paul B Jones: Apropos of not much, most of my family holiday, social event and pet snap shooter coworkers are doing their photography now with smart phones instead of compact point and shoots.
This has changed the nature of the photographs taken. In many peoples' hands the smart phones don't handle low light scenes, bright light scenes or action scenes all that well. I know the phones can take brilliant pictures but it seems a lot of folks don't feel it necessary to put as much effort into their pictures as they used to. It is almost like the phones have changed the social value of photography, turning it from a semi-formal ritual into a mundane and hurried documentation of all random and not random activity.
I guess I am probably coming across as a snob but that is not my intent. The rise of the smartphone is perhaps creating a new form of photography in which the quantity of images taken is more important than their quality. It makes sense that this trend would be reflected in the flickr stats.
The Canon and Nikon dinosaur is showing the world has hit a comet and their defenders are gasping for a few more breaths.
Apple uses a Sony camera module
steelhead3: I wonder if Canon will be as forthcoming with AF problems in the 7DII?
Go over to Naturscapes and read all the experienced photographers returning their cameras.
If the user can't operate the AF, don't you think the camera has a problem?
I wonder if Canon will be as forthcoming with AF problems in the 7DII?
steelhead3: The one problem with the analysis is that the major camera makers( sony, canon and nikon) all put their money on FF and leave aps-c lenses in the consumer level.Fuji and 4/3 seemed to be fixed in their format and do produce good lenses (pentax less so), but of course this may change if FF starts dominating the market and these lesser camera companies have to follow suit to FF.
I am talking variety...their new 16/55 better be good, it is huge and heavy. Compare to the 16/50 Sony 2.8. (no light weight).
Fuji certainly doesn't give full support of lenses (not that they aren't trying) and 4/3 is certainly fleshing out their line up, but it takes a long time to develop a good system. Ask Sony, which is trying to keep 4 different levels happy; lens capacity is a problem for everyone.