agentlossing: BOO. Tamron, you can do better than that, since you seem to be finally noticing M4/3 exists why not try something we don't already have available from first-party manufacturers?
I agree to some extend, if they made it moisture proof, like the 28-300 for 35mm sensors, than it would have been worth the price too.
ChrisPercival: What lens was used for the studio scene test?
I'd use the 60mm Macro since it's in the same ballpark as the 50mm with regards to sharpness.
hajagosb: I wouldn't even consider these CX Nikons not just because they are overpriced, but why can't they sell the body only? I'm not paying for any kit including a bad zoom.
@retro76Don't spread misinformation.I wouldn't say the NEX and E-M5 are lightyears ahead but they do have noticible better IQ than Nikon 1. The difference in IQ is bigger between those then the diff between E-M5 and Fuji Trans-X sensors.
misolo: It's almost the same size as the GM1 (the S2 is a couple of mm larger), but has one less stop of light (compact zoom has same f-number, sensor has about half the area). The S2 will probably have to drop its price a little bit from the MSRP...
It's mor probably 1,5 to 2 stops.
Dirk Nuary: So much money for that 1 inch ILC? Nooooo... So many APSC ILC that give you cheaper yet better image.
I'm not a 1" fan but I wonder where you find that cheaper APS-C ILC's. You mean the Sony outdated models or old models from Samsung? If compared like for like at release prices than APS-C is more expensive. But I wouldn't bother with both, for me m43 is the sweet spot.
Calistoga_Guy: When the A77 was released years ago it was such a let down. Does so much, but that image sensor was and is just worthless to this event shooter that is now just starting to shoot weddings. So I moved on to the Fuji X100 watching and waiting for the next big thing. That next big thing is the Sony A7S. This mark 2, Sure the auto focus is great, and it is packed with features, but 24MP in APS-C means worthless for night sports, weddings, night events, etc. I'm not into the tricks like down sizing the image. dSLRs like this need better image sensors for high ISO work. Another camera to skip. For those shooting landscapes, and daytime sports, and anything that will allow you to shoot from base ISO to say ISO 800, this camera seems awesome.
Ben O Connor: How come a "fujisensor" cam can be rated higher than micro 43 cam. in spesific areas.
There is the ultimate art director of M43 ; Olympus E-M1There is the amazing movie director of M43; Panasonic GH-3
And does fuji better than those two in spesific areas such as ... almost all areas ? COME ON !!
Well APS-C is not necessarily better because it's bigger.IMO the X-T1 has a terrible user interface. The analog knobs are more a hindrance than a benefit.For Me the E-M1 is king. The very lttle difference in IQ is negligible.
fdfgdfgdgf: Very old news,good product for 5 years ago slow lens,no IBIS small sensori am getting sleepy from Nikon,sold the bulky DSLR
So what, it's an ILC?ILC doesn't have dedicated slow lenses per definition. It's not the domain of APS-C and 35mmFF only.There are Fuji and Panasonic with F1.2 lenses, not slow in my book, and then there's Voightlander for mFT F0.95 which is extremely fast.
beavertown: 900 buck for this cheap crap???
@beavertownQuiet right I have a 14-150 mFT lens that is half the price, and is similarly specced.
JKP: The connector looks a bit flimsy.
Yeah, that flash shoe better be robust
yonsarh: Sony A6000 vs Nikon 1 V3 which one will you choose ?
@hippo84, how come you think A6000 is faster than E-M1(0)Have you done a comparison of them in real life.
Jon Ingram: The reviewer is dead-wrong regarding "philosophical similarities" between the Df and the x-t1. First, the Df system is huge compared to the Fuji system. Second, Nikon forced a retro concept into their digital camera system. Fuji, on the other hand, has spent years developing their system with manual controls from the ground up, with enthusiast photographers in mind. Sure, at first glance, they are both are retro-looking expensive cameras, but that is where the similarities end. Philosophically, Nikon was targeting a fad; they were aiming for people who were willing to pay a premium simply for the look and feel of the camera. Fuji, on the other hand, are targeting enthusiast photographers, who value function just as much (or more) than the looks of the camera.
@KonstantinosK. Hooray for you.I'm in photography since 1976 and have seen the change from MF to AF and the change from all manual to program modes en using buttons iso all dials. Yes it was and is progress to be able to adjust settings with the camera in your face.With the X-T1 you get a camera with two locking dials ... WTF were they thinking.. back to the seventies or what.Retro looks ok, but retro functionallity? So you can see part of the settings when the camera is off, but does it make it that more ergonomic, I'd say, hell no.
Dennis: "uto ISO in manual mode, so you can specify the shutter speed and aperture you need, and let the camera set the ISO to match. But then the X-T1 ignores the exposure compensation dial,"
Argghhhh ! How hard is this to figure out ? 2+ years ago, I chose the Nikon D7000 over the Canon 7D for this reason. This is trivial stuff ! Nothing that isn't already being don in other exposure modes.
From what planet do you come. Pentax was the first to implement this and Olympus Pana e.a. had it for years.
HetFotoAtelier: I like my Nikon Df ! and my Fuji X-pro1 with OVF 100% more better viewfinder! not this camera with EVF!
Well today an EVF is much better than an OVF. If you shoot in dark environments an OVF is a no go for composition. And as a bonus an EVF can display much more usefull information than an OVF and the X-PRO1 is one of the worst OVF's IMO.
mgblack74: I'm looking for the word "silly" in this review. It was used fairly early in the the description of the Nikon Df and it never had a chance in the eyes of DPR reviewers after that. I guess because everyone is horny over Fuji these days, design elements are looked at through rose coloured glasses. C 'mon DPR... show the world you're fair and consistent and tell us the Fuji XT-1 is a silly design. An extra button step to engage selectable AF points should warrant that at least, no? Or the low mileage batteries, no? Or the single card slot, no? Hmmm.
Nikon Df is silly just as is this Fuji X-T1. C'mon, WTF, dials for EV shutterspeed and ISO that are hard to turn(oh yeah and to turn 2 of the dials you need to press a button in the middle), you need to take away your eye from the VF, again WTF, it's 2014 not 1971!No touchscreen LCD, what were they thinking. It looks like a hybrid Tablet where some controls are split between touchpad, touchscreen and keyboard. Ergonomic hell !
jazzybatra: Hello, I have an OMD EM5 and 75mm 1.8 lens. Most of my shots aure either out of focus or slow to focus small kids. Is this fast in OMD EM1? Is there a firmware or setting I should look at to make the focussing faster and accurate?
a 75 is like a 150 on 35mmFF totally the wrong lens for children up close. A 45mm is a much better choice here as it is 90mm equiv. but imo a 25mm (equiv to the nifty fifty) is the best choice.The DOF of the 75 is so narrow it's like 8 cm on a three meter distance a challenge for any camera, a 45 the DOF is 25 cm.I guess you're a beginner that bought into an advanced system.Learn to use it first before spending too much money on lenses that are not suitable for the job!
Marvol: It's interesting to me how all the naysayers - except the ones who want RAW - are divided over what is ACTUALLY wrong with these things.
To some they are too large, to some too expensive - but others want to add flash, EVF, zoom rings, whatnot; larger, more expensive.
The list of things that Sony *should really* have done is seemingly endless. Internal memory, connection with Sony smartphones, fixed wide angle lens, collapsible zoom, FF sensor, E-mount instead, more buttons... indicating to me that Sony (apart from leaving RAW off the QX-100) actually got it fairly right, on average.
Well I think Sony has got it right. (and I'm not a Sony fan)Think of the possibilities of selling larger batteries with back for the phones. The clamps for different phones and I could go on. RAW could be added later incl other software related tidbits. This is but the first iteration so ....Yeah, I can see it's potential.
gerard boulanger: Why they don't use the "flash" on the phone as an AF assist lamp?
Very good idea.In general this solution has potential. It's just the plain stupid who don't see the market.But then again the photography world is full of dinosaurs clinging to their 35mmFF camera's as if they are the god of photography. It makes me laugh every time again.Like someone above also said, this is innovation and thinking outside of the box. I love that.
spidermoon: "This means there's no space for an aperture ring" ? Pentax-M 40mm f/2.8 or Chinon 45mm f2.8 are pancake lenses and have an aperture ring. But nowday, with all those drive-by-wire lenses, maybe you can't put mechanical aperture ring.
Yeah they might have an aperture ring but they don't have AF motors in them!
yabokkie: I use EF40/2.8 as "lens cap" that almost as good as some f/2.8 zooms. if this lens delivers as good resolution it could be a good lens cap for XF cameras.
since f/2.8 on APS-C is about 1.3 stops darker than f/2.8 on 35mm full-frame, the price should also be about 1.3 stops lower, or at least at half price of EF40/2.8.
On which lens can you mount it then?Or do you mean BODY CAP!