does this applie to istock photos too?
i still have a few hundred images on istock.never cared to delete my account.
another way to cut off the photographer from the profits.getty is making money with your work but you don´t see a dime.....
Carlos Loff: Stop talking and launch cameras with your top specs and fair prices - DONT YOU WANT TO SELL ANYMORE ???
lol.. are you joking or are you just clueless?how can you ask the market leader such a silly question?
canons sells more then all other companys.
you better ask nikon that question.
marginal D4s updates and a digital frankenstein camera that´s a pain to use.
another lame interview....
i don´t know why the interviewers never ask the questions that come up on every forum.
as only one example... why not asking why canon is still using 7 year old sensor manufacturing? a 500nm process.they improve sensors... well not as much as others do.
the 18MP sensor get´s a bit long in the tooth even with dual pixel AF.
the 1DX sensor is fantastic and it´s a wonder canon can do this with a process that is at least 3 steps behind sonys manufacturing process.
still the question is when will canon update to the same manufacturing process as, for example, sony?
canon builds the best overall DSLR´s. i love my 1D X.but the real question is .... when will canon improve sensor perfomance?with improved DR and low read noise of current sony sensors canon would be unbeatable.
exdeejjjaaaa: any oils drops on sensor ? those new mirrors..
i think that´s a feature for nikons now....
mantra: hibut can't understand one thinga friend of mine bought the d4 about 4 or 5 month ago and it was not cheap!!now nikon releases the D4swhat's about the d4? it's already devalued or?thanks
yeah but you get 1 FPS more with the 4Ds and useless high ISO. that must be worth something....
tvstaff: It would be nice if Canon did the same and replaced EVERY mirror box in the 1DX. A $7,000 body should not have oil and debris issues. PERIOD. How can Nikon do this for a consumer camera and Canon is leaving it's pros hanging???? If Nixon ' s new D4 is a winner, canon will lose a lot of pros!!!
there is no issue on the 1DX. thats the "problem" you clown.
i have one since 2012.
lap777: Maybe Nikon didn't have a permanent, tested and good solution before now, so it wouldn't have helped to repair all the D600's before now. Just saying..
according to nikon there was no issue.....
JohnEwing: Glad I bought mine on the Rockwell Principle - get a refurb. New shutter, pristine sensor, no problems. Great camera. Who needs a 610?
Concerning my *next* camera, I'd be very happy if people started buying just-out kit right now, so that I can buy another refurb next year or the one after, with all the problems ironed out.
Seriously, though (well, I wasn't exactly joking) I'm glad to see this move. It speaks of a will to better customer relations, and is vaguely reminiscent of Fuji's updating the X100 firmware after the camera had been discontinued, the difference being that Fuji's gesture had goodwill behind it and Nikon's has more than a touch of contrition, albeit unacknowledged.
your not ashamed to write that name?oh i forgot your a nikon user....
reginalddwight: I shoot with Nikon but they have easily become the laughingstock of camera companies.
One month after the D600 announcement in September 2012, reports came quickly splattering in about possible oil and dust issues which culminated in the seminal report by Roger Cicala of Lensrentals in October 2012.
Nikon issued their 1st service advisory in February 2013 about a possible dust issue with the D600. They offered to inspect and clean the sensor, if necessary.
Now one year and two class-action lawsuits later, Nikon issue a 2nd service advisory about a free inspection and shutter replacement?
And you ask why Nikon have lost goodwill with many of their faithful customers...
yeah.. and it sure does not help to be the worst performer in the nikkei 2013.
small updates to the D4s, the crappy D600, worst underperformer in the nikkei. nikon is not doing well.
WAIT WAIT..... did nikon did not say all the time there is NO ISSUE.... only normal dust collection.
Lucas_: I'll never be convinced by a 16MP FF sensor.
looking at you baby images i can see why....
Henry M. Hertz: the question is... does nikons claim hold up that ISO 1600 on this camera looks like ISO 800 on the D4.
i have not seen sample images yet.and is it JPG or RAW they speak about?
im not really interested in a better JPG noise reduction.i shoot only RAW.
and when it is so good.. why only a nativ ISO of 25600?
the question is... does nikons claim hold up that ISO 1600 on this camera looks like ISO 800 on the D4.
Just a Photographer: The s stands for Software update?
Come on Nikon what kind of update is this really?
ok.. let me add it depend on how good the new sensor is.maybe the new sensor is really exciting.
we will see.
well yes.... but it´s still not an exciting update if you ask me.
same as the canon 700D is not an exciting update over the 650D.
compared with my 1D X i say it´s even a blah update.
i expected nikon to beat my "old" 1D X with a new flagship camera.now i expect canon to just make a small 1D X MK2 update too.
that´s not driving innovation.... :(
Henry M. Hertz: i say that´s a disappointment.
this camera does not not beat the "old" 1D X.or do you really think ISO 400k is usable for anything than 100 pixel facebook images? LOL
but it´s good to see that nikon now has gigabit ethernet.studio shooter will love it.
overall sure a nice camera but nothing impressing on this update.it´s like a new rebel from canon. marginal improvements......
ps: the smallish viewfinder (compared to the 1DX) is something i would hate.VF can´t be big enough.
did you ever shoot at ISO 102.400 ... can i see images?
i say 409.600 is useless for 98% of the customers. because they will not use it.
and we have to see how much (if) better ISO 102.400 is.
DWM: "While large, the D4s' viewfinder still falls short of Canon flagship EOS 1D X as well as the less expensive 5D Mark III."
How about "The size of the viewfinder is quite large, and in use is essentially indistinguishable from the high end Canons." (Which is clearly the case).
The Canon-centric comparisons get tiresome after a while.
fact is a fact..... even when aps-c viewfinder are fine for YOU.
WACONimages: Probably a perfect photograph machine! Will deliver stunning images, no doubt about that. In my opinion however these kind of cameras are a dying breed in the long term.
and your opinion is based on what?the believe that pros will shoot with an iphone in the future? :)
or that we all switch to medium format?they have to become a lot faster to be usefull for sports photographer. ;)
Henry M. Hertz: it´s good to see that, 3 years after canon, nikon user get gigabit lan too.
why USB3 is no standard in such expensive cameras still puzzles me.
but the 1D X was announced 2011. prototypes where available much earlier. ;)i bought mine in july 2012.
but let´s not fight over ~1 year.
fact is that 100mbit was a joke and that USB2 is still the standard is annoying.
GodSpeaks: Too bad Ken Rockwell was wrong about it being 24MP.
ROTFL....KR know s*it.
as he writes on his website: he likes to make things up.he is the rodney dangerfield of photography. annoying and clueless.