joshxiv

joshxiv

Lives in Philippines Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined on Oct 14, 2010

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)

Not bad. This + maybe a Q7 and the '06' f/2.8 tele would be a great travel combo. And it'll give you a better sensor on the wide end vs a Stylus 1.

Though I wish Sony had done more to improve the handling. Though my gripe is more with the Powershot-like dial on the back, similar to the one on the Panasonic GM1 rather than the clickless lens ring. Anyone planning on making a small camera should look at the Pentax Q's controls, now, that's the way to do a small bodied camera.

Direct link | Posted on May 17, 2014 at 06:04 UTC as 533rd comment
On Ricoh to offer limited edition Pentax Q7 Premium Kit article (89 comments in total)

This is actually tempting for me. Although the only lens I'm really interested in in the current Q line-up is the '06' f/2.8 tele-zoom. A Q7 + the 06 would pair nicely with my GR & RX1. The 08 lens would be a nice bonus though.

If Pentax could come out with an f/1.0 wide-ish walk around lens, maybe 28/35/40mm EFOV, it would round out the system pretty well. I think given the small sensor, an f/1.0 lens wouldn't be obscenely large. It would probably be only slightly larger than the largest zoom for the Q.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2014 at 03:47 UTC as 16th comment | 4 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Review preview (347 comments in total)

Price keeps dropping on this one, so I'll most likely spring for one. GX7 sensor in a small package is a biggie for me.

The only possible deal breaker is the Powershot-like back dial, like on the Oly E-PL series. If the Pentax Q can incorporate a proper back dial, I don't see why they couldn't do one here.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 26, 2013 at 03:42 UTC as 40th comment

This is listed as about 2.7in long, so it's about the same length as the FA31 or the 18-55 WR. It also means it's significantly smaller than the DA* 16-50.

This is pretty much the largest lens I'm willing to consider in any system. I actually wish they only did a 20-30mm lens, and kept it smaller, but I think I will be in the minority in wanting that, LOL.

I no longer shoot Pentax or DSLRs, but I just might pick up an old K5 just for this, so I can have a good compact weather sealed kit. I used to shoot with the DA15/FA31/FA77 plus the 18-55WR as my weather sealed lens.

Though I kind of wish Pentax would just re-issue the DA15 ir DA21 as a WR lens, LOL. That would be even better for me.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2013 at 03:15 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Ricoh GR preview article (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

3systermuser: Seriously, I just cannot get why it is so special , it seems to me is another boring 28mm fixed lens camera from last decade or even last century.

Nikon A was also very boring but this one seems even worse , it has no EVF , it has no 4k video or any serious video mode , and I think it does not even have any kind of IS/VR/VC,etc.
So why do so many people get excited about this GR thing?

It's basically a GRD with a larger sensor.

Which means that it's a very customizable camera with a great lens, and is a very appealing camera to those of us who like cameras that get out of the way when shooting, especially in the streets. I cannot emphasize this enough, because you don't see this just by glancing at some spec sheet.

Also, part of the appeal is that with the GW-3 adapter, it is also one of the most compact ways to get a 21mm EFOV f/2.8, at any sensor size. (As the GW-2 did with the GRD IV, at f/1.9)

To me, the lack of an EVF option is the biggest negative. But for me, isn't too much of a deal-breaker, considering the competition. With snap focus, I can get away with using an OVF most of the time. Not ideal, but compared to my experience with an XE1 - you get an EVF in a compact body and an on-screen distance/DOF scale, sure - but the focus-by-wire implementation was just dismal. I'd rather have Ricoh's snap focus.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 04:00 UTC
On Preview:nikon-coolpix-a (442 comments in total)

RE: Viewfinders -

The Nikon VF is just a simple non-electronic VF - But since the lens is a 28mm EFOV, you don't have to buy the Nikon finder - there are excellent 28mm finders out there for about USD $160-200.

Even the Oly VF-1 (designed for a 35mm EFOV) (USD $85 ) can be used for a 28mm FOV if you use the whole viewfinder and ignore the brightlines.

Or even a 21/25 VF, if you only use the 25mm brightlines, will probably better approximate a 28mm FOV, depending on whether you shoot within a couple of feet or whether you shoot at infinity most of the time.

Posted on Mar 6, 2013 at 03:51 UTC as 81st comment
On Preview:nikon-coolpix-a (442 comments in total)
In reply to:

joshxiv: I could live with an external 'dumb' finder on an APS-C camera, if it had controls and snap focus function similar to the Ricoh GRD series; or a useful DOF scale on the lens or on the screen (like the X1 or the Fuji X's) or a focus wheel like the Sigma DP series.

But as it is, an X100 with the 28mm adapter is simply a much better buy. Or wait and see what the GRD V may bring.

Distance scale!

Nice, thanks Ray!

That pretty much changes my opinion of this camera. From a 'meh' to 'I just might get one if it were around USD $800.'

I'm probably one of very few people here who are thankful it's only an f/2.8 lens. I'd rather have a compact lens than a large f/1.8 VR lens.

Definitely starting to look interesting to me.

Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 15:24 UTC
On Preview:nikon-coolpix-a (442 comments in total)

I could live with an external 'dumb' finder on an APS-C camera, if it had controls and snap focus function similar to the Ricoh GRD series; or a useful DOF scale on the lens or on the screen (like the X1 or the Fuji X's) or a focus wheel like the Sigma DP series.

But as it is, an X100 with the 28mm adapter is simply a much better buy. Or wait and see what the GRD V may bring.

Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 13:11 UTC as 130th comment | 2 replies

Looks good to me.

f/2.8 at that size is pretty good, IMO. If you want faster, then get the CZ 24mm.

$350 may be pricier than the Canon 22mm, but one still has to bear in mind that despite the glacial pace Sony has released lenses for the NEX system, it's still significantly more mature than Canon's mirrorless system - and $350 is still much cheaper than other relatively compact APS-C lenses in roughly the same FL:

Fuji XF 18mm f/2 R - ~$600 USD. Faster, but much larger, and with a non-reversible hood.

Pentax 21mm f/3.2 Limited pancake - ~$600 USD. Superb build quality, has a DOF scale, and a great hood, a pain to use with filters though.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 12:20 UTC as 37th comment
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9