davids8560: Paid $700 for the first one. Used it daily for a week or two. But never hardly touched it after that. Used to laugh about it. My older, worser slightly larger camera handled better and its longer reach was far more useful to me. Ended up parting with the little marvel for $225. What a deal that buyer got. GAS says buy the Mark 4.
But I dunno. I just don't think. Clearly. You?
flashdash: it has lots of CA
Jennyhappy2: Kind of scary, but if you look above in the Gear In This Story section, 10 people indicate for the RX100 IV they have already owned it. Kind of scary or maybe their just confused?.
Remember the old DPR days where there would be user reviews the day a camera was announced? They would give star ratings for image quality on a camera that wasn't out yet. There are people in this world who grew up missing their bus stop every day.
Edited to be kinder and gentler.
ianimal: I am still using my RX100 (first edition). Good enough for my use/need.Would love a RX series camera with APS-C sensor size.
APS-C. The size would be crazy. I did think Sony was going to bump up to a 4/3 sensor because the GM1 and 5 are very small and I believe Sony could have improved on what the Pana offered.
vesa1tahti: So noisy images ! Oly E-PM2 and Pana GM1 deliver much better images. Worse than the first RX100.
I have the RX100 (I) and the GM1. The GM1 does have better IQ in certain circumstances. The "kit" lens is slower and although better in high ISO shots than one might expect I would give the RX100 line the edge there. Obviously slap on a Pan-Leica 15 and it is no contest BUT you lose the zoom. Then there is the size difference. I still think the RX100 line is special because of what it gives you in a small package.
TheDman: No matter how much the image is improved over the raw file, you're always going to get the few yahoos that say "I like the original better".
The DPR simply must find a way to regulate opinions to take care of those who do not fall in line. Enough is enough.
Juck: Some of the critical comments here are petty, rude and embarrassing. Not one iota of constructive criticism. Get a life.
When will people get the rule that if a photo is printed in the DPR news section it must be liked? Fall in goose step and praise the photo.
There are currently 65 comments and I am not seeing a lot of "petty, rude and embarrassing".
There is a rude and embarrassing one early on labeling those who prefer the original shot as "yahoos". Imagine having the nerve to have your own opinion!
Still wondering which flash this camera takes? Has anybody seen a photo of the Q with a flash mounted? I get high ISO so please don't tell me about that. There are times only a flash will do. Will the flash be bundled or another $700 or so purchase?
Which flash will it accept?
bluevellet: My only two issues with this camera is the price and the 28mm focal lenght (a bit too wide for general photography). But aside from that, it looks like a more desirable camera than the RX1. It can't focus as bad as the Sony one, that's for sure.
I too would have prefered 35.
mcshan: Looks great! I would prefer the classic 35mm but this will still be quite a camera to shoot with. Good for Leica.
The image is still cropped from a wider shot and will not look the same as a true 35mm shot.
qwertio: The LX100 looks better
The LX100 is also larger. Personally I like a smaller camera for a point and shoot. When all the IV crazy rumors were floating around I put in my 2 cents that I didn't want Sony to screw up the RX line by making it bigger. Looks like they didn't. I;m curious if the "new" sensor will improve IQ.
I never believed the many rumors about it having a larger sensor.
QuarryCat: I like the design and handling of the Panasonic LX100 much more - a good camera is more then a sensor.
I'm with Cipher on this one. The LX100 is a fine camera but to me it isn't compact enough. The RX100 line remains impressive.
Looks great! I would prefer the classic 35mm but this will still be quite a camera to shoot with. Good for Leica.
Frank C.: probably considers it his magnum opus which is truly sad indeed...
Make above "subjective".
All good wishes.
expressivecanvas: Doesn't anyone else feel that this makes this one musician seem a bit egotistical and pompous? As a musician, I probably would not have wanted to be the model for this particular project.
Now... if the photographer put in the effort to create an ultra-stitch of a full orchestra in action... I'm all for it and encourage it! THAT would be a project with so many people to direct... and nobody would come across as egotistical and pompous.
I'm with expressive on this one. I would have prefered a straight rendering. Just my opinion.
Hugo808: What's the guy on the top left stage doing with that huge toilet roll?
Let's hope he doesn't squeeze the Charmin.
Totomo Yap: From the left crop image, I found right side first violin player lost the leg!!!
There is another photo where that violin player is every soldier in a war scene and sadly his leg was lost.
Frank is entitled to his opinion. Reaction to any photograph is subjection and I loved reading Frank's take. It is the sum of all opinions that makes the discussion for me.