ezradja

ezradja

Lives in Indonesia Cirebon Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Works as a Wedding & Event Photographer
Has a website at www.facebook.com/laurasalon
Joined on Jul 28, 2004

Comments

Total: 229, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On Facebook buys photo sharing service Instagram for $1bn article (144 comments in total)

BOOM! Now what would you say iSheep fanboys?!?!?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2012 at 18:06 UTC as 57th comment | 2 replies
On Photoshop CS6 Blur Gallery Tutorial article (162 comments in total)

Very nice new feature there .. Kudos to Adobe...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2012 at 05:29 UTC as 28th comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 low light high ISO sample series article (283 comments in total)

the 3200 iso sample image is not in the same 2012 standard quality. Just peek at Sony NEX 5N/7 and/or Fujifilm X100 and/or Canon Powershot G1X and they have better noise and details. Sorry but there's no big improvement on micro third system while other system has right now.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2012 at 06:55 UTC as 18th comment | 5 replies

no Android inside? I'll pass ;)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 06:05 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

Abeautifulmind: Flash.
Canon has made the compact camera I was waiting for.
I use Nikon SLR's since more than 30 years but they haven't convinced me with their Nikon 1 's.

Could anyone tell me if I could use a Nikon SB-600 speed light on the Canon G1 X ?

do you need to put the duck tape to close the flash to hot shoe contact, leaving only to the center or it is not necessary to block the metal contact?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2012 at 06:54 UTC

Pefect for NEX VG-20 and FS100!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 04:43 UTC as 30th comment
On IMG_0402 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

tack sharp and arguably noise free :) decent image quality from G1 X!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:55 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)

tack sharp and arguably noise free :) decent image quality from G1 X!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:55 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo in sample gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

manishsaini: so much noise in the sky.......not acceptable at this price :P

on 6400 ISO, probably D4 would be noisy too on the dark underexpose sky. Your point?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:48 UTC
On IMG_0470 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

manishsaini: so much noise in the sky.......not acceptable at this price :P

on 6400 ISO, probably D4 would be noisy too on the dark underexpose sky. Your point?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:48 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G1 X samples gallery article (425 comments in total)

the noise reduction is quite aggresive. But probably the raw would do justice to the image. Is there any option on noise reduction on jpeg?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:45 UTC as 71st comment | 6 replies
On IMG_0476 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (28 comments in total)

not very useful on 12800 in full resolution but better than Canon's other older sensors anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:43 UTC as 15th comment
On photo in sample gallery (28 comments in total)

not very useful on 12800 in full resolution but better than Canon's other older sensors anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:43 UTC as 15th comment
On photo in sample gallery (4 comments in total)

too much noise reduction, destroying the detail on the corner on the bottom. Unfortunately ugly. The raw probably just fine.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:40 UTC as 3rd comment
On IMG_0434 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

too much noise reduction, destroying the detail on the corner on the bottom. Unfortunately ugly. The raw probably just fine.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:40 UTC as 3rd comment
On ISO_12800 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (34 comments in total)

yup, just like fujifilm tested the water (on m43) with its X100 to their last product X1 pro, probably Canon does it too with this G1 X to its mirrorless camera. Probably not in 3:2 format but the same as G1 X but with interchangeable lenses system to differentiate with their DSLR line ups. Make sense?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:35 UTC as 4th comment
On photo in sample gallery (34 comments in total)

yup, just like fujifilm tested the water (on m43) with its X100 to their last product X1 pro, probably Canon does it too with this G1 X to its mirrorless camera. Probably not in 3:2 format but the same as G1 X but with interchangeable lenses system to differentiate with their DSLR line ups. Make sense?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2012 at 07:35 UTC as 4th comment
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (776 comments in total)

it just the lens that turn off the hype. Slow at 2,8-5,8 and you can't change that lens forever. Skip.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 02:40 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies

This is the real "poor man" Leica!!! not X100!!! LOL :)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 02:38 UTC as 20th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm X-Pro1 preview (756 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo nuts: Sample images from Fujifilm here:

http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_pro1/sample_images/

Expecting to see pixel sharpness rivaling that of Sigma SD1/9/10/14. Didn't happen. Nothing particularly exciting... All hype....

I more interested in dynamic range than sharpness on this.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 10:42 UTC
Total: 229, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »