ezradja

ezradja

Lives in Indonesia Cirebon Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Works as a Wedding & Event Photographer
Has a website at www.facebook.com/laurasalon
Joined on Jul 28, 2004

Comments

Total: 208, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Good price for constant f 1.8 aperture zoom! Let's hope the street price would be lower :)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2013 at 08:03 UTC as 98th comment
On Samsung unveils Galaxy S4 Zoom camera/phone hybrid article (222 comments in total)

Let me put this way:
Samsung S4 Zoom vs iPhone5: better phone, much much better camera, Samsung win

S4 Zoom vs Pureview808: better phone OS, Nokia win at image quality.

Samsung S4 Zoom vs Fujifilm X20: Fujifilm X20 win (and all of advanced pocketable/smallish camera in Samsung S4 Zoom price range)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2013 at 15:47 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
On Leica announces X Vario zoom compact with APS-C sensor article (757 comments in total)

Leica fans logic:
Very affordable price, imagine if you bought M9 with leica zoom lens, that would be more than 10.000 USD. So, thanks Leica for bring this cheap camera for us middle class fans.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2013 at 02:44 UTC as 125th comment | 1 reply
On Leica teases 'Mini M' for 11th June release article (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

40daystogo: My dream Leica camera would be, firstly, affordable, and have a full frame sensor or APS-C with a non-interchangeable 24-90 Leica zoom lens with at least f2.0 or preferably f1.4 aperture. That would cover most of my photographic needs. i.e. their X2 with zoom lens.

I am disappointed with the Sony RX1 and Leica X1, X2 series because I need a good zoom lens, rather than fixed focal length.

The Leica zoom lens on the Panasonic LX5/LX7 - Leica D-Lux 5 etc is really sharp, and I'd love a Leica camera with non-interchangeable zoom with a decent sensor size.

affordable Leica? Good luck with that :)
btw, Fujifilm X-Pro is quite good.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2013 at 07:58 UTC
On Canon Powershot G15 Preview preview (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

ezradja: RX100 is a fine camera, but the price is a bit higher than I would like ... G15 is better version of G12 with a much brighter lens ... G1X is still the low light king ... The body design of X-series Fujifilm is gorgeous ... Nikon Coolpix is still worse than competitors, sorry ...

Hmm, after looking to RX-100 RAW file, the image is better than the jpeg though, especially at higher ISO

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2012 at 03:59 UTC
On Canon Powershot G15 Preview preview (246 comments in total)

RX100 is a fine camera, but the price is a bit higher than I would like ... G15 is better version of G12 with a much brighter lens ... G1X is still the low light king ... The body design of X-series Fujifilm is gorgeous ... Nikon Coolpix is still worse than competitors, sorry ...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2012 at 03:56 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Canon EOS M preview samples gallery article (130 comments in total)

saw some low light high iso samples of this camera and my first impression is negatives so far. Too bad. And the body itself is not charming enough, as if this camera is targeting for domestic market. Canon, why you don't use retro look on this camera design? We really want to see Canonet comeback from the grave.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 08:40 UTC as 33rd comment | 5 replies
On IMG_0890 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

worse than G1X?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 08:35 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

ezradja: More expensive than 50mm 1,8. Nikon always like that, overrated overpriced product LOL

@Francis Every single Nikon lens is pricier than Canon counterpart except for a few rare lenses, I don't know, is it because Nikon lenses has some Canon license fee on it or Nikon just greedier than Canon LOL

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 03:31 UTC
In reply to:

ezradja: More expensive than 50mm 1,8. Nikon always like that, overrated overpriced product LOL

Why everyone bashing Nikon labelled as Canon troll, ah, those who labeling are Nikon trolls LOL no wonder! @Francis Carver
I use D700 and D7000 at studio and didn't like it, I use iMac at work (studio) and didn't like it more than my Windows PC at home. You are the Nikon troll! I am not Canon fans.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 03:28 UTC
On Hands-on with Nikon V2 article (454 comments in total)

Canon EOS M is a disappointment, Nikon 1 series also a disappointment. Why they can't do the right thing with mirror-less camera for foreign market? Of course, EOS M and Nikon 1 are targeted for some of young people in domestic (Japan) market, it's obvious. While Fuji with its X series is targeting domestic market and abroad.

Canon EOS M, wrong body choice (why put S100ish body to APS sized sensor mirrorless system?)

Nikon 1 series, wrong sensor size.

Fuji, right sensor size, right body.

BTW, IMHO, the industrial design of this V2 actually not bad at all, if only it has the right sensor size (of course not Nikon 1 system, APS sized sensor is more preferable) then with the right price (700-900 USD?) should this V2 to be appealing to a much more audiences.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 02:43 UTC as 123rd comment

This is definitely better than Nikon V2!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 06:50 UTC as 5th comment

But i guess it's still a good system for kids with rich parents. I mean, they better handled this than the real DLSR/MILCs.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:41 UTC as 265th comment

Come on, those who defend this system, are you not considered yourself fanboys? LOL
It's not about it's look, it's not ugly.
The system that's suck! Small sized sensor, relatively slow lenses, unbelievable high price, all are bad!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:36 UTC as 269th comment | 2 replies

Fujifilm X100 is already a dream comes true camera!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 03:26 UTC as 389th comment

iOS and Android apps simply couldn't (right now, at least) catch up with the capabilities that Lightroom, Adobe Photoshop provided, so just wait for Windows 8 tablet then. Let see, if Nokia, the maker of Pureview handsets will making Pureview tablet with WIndows 8 (not RT version) that could use Lightroom, and any native Windows program, then ....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2012 at 06:14 UTC as 69th comment
On Cameras get 'smart' to stay competitive post (58 comments in total)

DSLRs or MILCs with android, anyone? That would be awesome!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2012 at 06:09 UTC as 3rd comment
On The iPad Workflow post (76 comments in total)

BTW, please broaden the topic not only iPad but all kinds of tablets will you, dpreview admins?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2012 at 06:03 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply
On The iPad Workflow post (76 comments in total)

before any Lightroom function like on my tablet (iPad or Android) then it's off limit for use for serious photography. Of course if you just want to posting on social media such as facebook, instagram etc, tablets should be sufficient.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2012 at 06:02 UTC as 19th comment
On Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms article (628 comments in total)

another attempt to do Leica way, re-branding the product, multiply the price. iPhone, Leica, Hasselblad Vertu etc

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 04:23 UTC as 208th comment
Total: 208, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »