ezradja

ezradja

Lives in Indonesia Cirebon Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Works as a Wedding & Event Photographer
Has a website at www.facebook.com/laurasalon
Joined on Jul 28, 2004

Comments

Total: 208, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (661 comments in total)

Q and now this? Unlike Canikon, Pentax is bold!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 23:49 UTC as 118th comment
On Ricoh to offer limited edition Pentax Q7 Premium Kit article (88 comments in total)

Negative commentary by someone never used it at the first place. LOL Pentax Q system probably the best mirrorless system if you want some fun with it. Different feel, it's small, it's made you change your habits, it's small but addictive. I never thought that before. I thought at first, it's justa toy.... But I must cconfess that Pentax Q is what I put on my camera bag the most than my DSLRs with better optics.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 23:31 UTC as 28th comment
On Ricoh launches Pentax Q-mount ultra-wide-angle zoom article (58 comments in total)

still prefer a wide prime than this :( come on Ricoh/Pentax, don't be a Can-iko-ny-ji-pus-nic

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2013 at 05:06 UTC as 5th comment
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)

fugly as hell, more than pentax k-01 imho
Canon, take note, don't make the same mistake as Nikon, please

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 04:46 UTC as 990th comment | 1 reply

I wonder how much Panasonic get from Leica rebadge digicams?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 12:23 UTC as 18th comment | 3 replies

Fuji can do this in 500USD range price, why Canon and Nikon can't?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2013 at 03:03 UTC as 36th comment | 3 replies
On Sony A3000 preview (677 comments in total)

NEX 3 sensor with built in evf and comfortable hand grip without the extra money? Nice play Sony!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 04:25 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ezradja: too expensive imo

Galaxy NX price is not expensive, it just stupid, as if Samsung don't want to sell the camera, only for bragging right

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 04:21 UTC
In reply to:

Robert Morris: OMG, Someone at Nikon finally listened to what people were saying they wanted. There is hope for the world.

basically the spec is what Canon powershot G users wanted

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 04:16 UTC

too expensive imo

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 16:03 UTC as 64th comment | 3 replies
On Ten one-of-a-kind cameras from the 21st century article (248 comments in total)

Sony R1: 21,5 x 14,4mm 10MP sensor, 24-120mm 2,8-4,8
Canon G1X: 18,7 x 14mm 14MP sensor, 28-112mm 2,8-5,8
similar concept, very different size camera

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 23:22 UTC as 50th comment | 4 replies
On Ten one-of-a-kind cameras from the 21st century article (248 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anfy: I still own two Sony DSC-R1 and, at times, make use of them for portraits; I have the wide and tele converters as well, but they make the camera - not small in itself - so bulky you would not easily carry outside! :-)

Canon G1X probably the next generation (with a bit different concept) of Sony R1?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 14:14 UTC

LOL, Samsung, you are not a "Germanic" camera brand.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 16:40 UTC as 54th comment
On Sony A3000 preview (677 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: So small, too small. Guess it is a camera for women? The picture of the a3000 being used by a man is pretty silly.

the Canon 100D is smaller though

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 12:03 UTC
On Sony A3000 preview (677 comments in total)

this with speed booster ...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 00:30 UTC as 84th comment | 2 replies

the only instax mini I might like ...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 25, 2013 at 10:11 UTC as 46th comment
On Pentax Q7 Review preview (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

RobertSigmund: I have never read a more enthusiastic review. Certainly Pentax has bribed the tester, particularly for all the recommendations which cameras are better! :-D

really, bribery? that's a big accusation there! what's your prove?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 01:02 UTC
On Pentax Q7 Review preview (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

fakuryu: If you hate this camera, probably you just don't understand it.

"IF" you hate ...
then, I would say: why hate...
it take a brain to decipher this logic though...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 01:00 UTC
On Pentax Q7 Review preview (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

chj: What a failed product. It's not small, it's not inexpensive, it doesn't have great IQ. Instead of a product that is the best of both worlds (camera size and image quality), Pentax decided to make a product that was the worst of both worlds. It's for someone that wants a toy to act like they have a "pro kit". Which would be fine for kids if it was cheap. But the same money could actually buy a good camera. So the market is for the kids of silly rich people?

what a failed "popular" product, do you mean? It even beat the Nikon 1 system!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:28 UTC
On Pentax Q7 Review preview (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Katier: I have to say I find the review surprising. I use a basic Q and find it's performance excellent. It's ultra-compact nature with the 1.9 is very useful and I find IQ to be very good.

OK it obviously starts to get limited, especially ( in the Q with the smaller sensor) past around 800 ISO, but considering it's got such a small sensor high ISO performance isn't what it's about.

That said, the fact it runs with a 1.9 lens means that it's at least a stop better than the MLC competition unless your willing to spend over $1000 for a lens.

You can also do crazy things like put a 50mm f1.7 lens on it via an adapter and get a 210mm f1.7 (approx Q7) or 275mm f1.7 (Q/Q10).

In short, due to having high speed lenses the limited ISO range problem is reduced.. plus the compact size is a huge strength. I should add that have large hands and have zero problems with it.

Currently the Q is my main camera due to a DSLR theft, but I really only miss a view finder when compared to the DSLR.

The very good lens not mention here is the 15-45mm f/2.8.
I used a cheap magnetic viewfinder extender placed on the LCD when I needed it. Still not as good as OVF but at least it worked, on bright environment.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:26 UTC
Total: 208, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »