maarensv

Hi, A few month ago I was in the same position : should I sell my 7D for a 6D or 5DIII ? My main subjects are civil airplanes, landscapes, static objects and people. Except for the planes the same...

Hi, Seems like a nice line-up to me. May I ask how your DO compares to the 100-400 ? I was not quite impressed by the IQ the DO showed. Wide open it was far from sharp. Stopped down by 1 stop...

Maybe you still are. I might have a Hungarian first name, but for the rest I'm 100% Dutch.

Two plane pictures. http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1558624433/download/2406254 http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1558624433/download/2390552 The first one is at almost 300mm, f9. The second one...

Hi, In that case I guess your biggest choice is between IS or no IS ? The 70-200 is the better lens in every way : image quality, AF speed, constant aperture, build and build quality, it just only...

Having owned both I can tell you that the 7D is for sure better. Downsize a 7D file to 40D resolution and compare it with 40D shots : less noise, more detail in the 7D shots. The 60D is not built...

Hi,Indeed a big WOW for holding on so long !I've not heard of many (if any) making such a big step : from 350D to 6D. Most people have been upgrading several times or at least once in the mean...

Definitely true about the addition of data that isn't there, but that was not my point. There are enough (good) wide options for FF, both as zoom or prime to cover the wides. In fact I think there...

That only applies when you don't mind loosing resolution by quite a lot. Cropping to exact aps-c FOV means you'll be left with less than 8 Mpix (3420 x 2280 pixels = 7.8 Mpix). Enough in...

Forgot to say I do not care for WiFi, so can't comment on that.GPS instead is a feature I do like.Regards, Sandor.

Hi,Coming from a 7D and having the 6D for two month now.I really enjoyed using the 7D. Build and handling are both great and not matched by many cameras. The 6D handles well, build is OK, but both...

Hi, Yes the 100-400 is an airpump, but I've never had serious issues with dust. I think the dust problem is more a bad feeling than a real problem. Even in lenses like the 70-200s I see dust...

Don't really know, but doubt it that calibration is the issue.Maybe you can try another copy of the 18-135 somewhere ?Regards, Sandor.

From my (short) experience I think both wide and tele should have been sharp in the centre wide open. Photozones test corresponds with that. It looks to me that your 18-135 STM is under...

OK, I expect those to be better than the samples you showed.On the other hand, how many pictures do you take with aperture wide open ?You showed only 18mm shots. How about the mid and tele FL...

Are those centre, edge or corner crops ?

I'd be surprised if Sony's 18-135 is much better than the 18-135 STM. That would make it the first decent performing basis Sony lens.Do not expect any lens in this class to be perfect wide open....

Hi,Any one knows how the Sigma 50-500 OS acts on FF compared to the 100-400 L ?Sharpness in the center should be pretty the same (at least stopped down a bit) as I've read. At JuzaPhoto.com there...

300mm in the long end instead of only 200mm ? How many other zooms do 300mm f2.8 ?Question answered.Regards, Sandor.

It is in the exif of the original files. In case of the 6D and D600 it is both a 85mm f1.8 for instance.Regards, Sandor.