I just see the flash position. is the flash position correct ? I afraid many times finger will be blocking the flash. especially when we ask someone else to take the picture for us.
what is your opinion ?
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:54:24 UTC
as 22nd comment
tkbslc: I think people are making the wrong comparisons here. This is not a competitor to the G15, LX7, XZ-2, etc. This is a competitor to the S110. Basically it goes like, "Do you like the S110 but wish it had nearly double the zoom and a viewfinder?" or maybe even "Like the RX100, but willing to trade some high ISO performance for a bit more zoom and a viewfinder in a slimmer body?"
I get the feeling everyone thinks there should be one camera template that all companies follow. I'm glad we have options.
Lets wait what Panasonic will offer on LX9 Can we discuss about LX9 on the forum ? :)
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:43:08 UTC
dickg1: If Panasonic thinks this camera is going to seriously compete with the Canon S110 in attracting the "enthusiast" crowd, they screwed up big time!
In my mind, the feature that sets the Canon S110 apart from the majority of its peers is a 24mm wide end.
I recently sold my S95 and bought the S110 for just that reason. I'd much rather give up a 200mm long end to get a 24mm wide angle. The difference between 24mm & 28mm is much greater than the diffeence between 120mm and 200mm.
dickg1
I hope next time more cameras will have 24mm or maybe 20mm
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:36:47 UTC
298 g vs 192 g 111 x 68 x 46 mm (4.37 x 2.68 x 1.81″) vs 103 x 62 x 28 mm (4.06 x 2.44 x 1.1″)
But Less battery life, Less Exposure compensation Less Flash range, Less Exposure modes Slower Lens, White balance presets 4 vs 5 Unknown Number of focus points
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:34:37 UTC
utomo99: On some part of LF1 is good, but 1. F5.9 is not good enough, LX7 Lens is the best. If Panasonic can give this cameras better than F4 is good. 2. Price $ 500 is too high for this camera. $ 350-400 is good price 3.Low light. I really hope panasonic put the money on improving the sensor to make it work better on low light. On low light panasonic sensor performance below competitor. Panasonic always need better lens to help this.
For LF1 Panasonic need to improve the Venus engine to make it better work on light, but still keep the details. Without this, LF1 will not be success.
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:26:06 UTC
On some part of LF1 is good, but 1. F5.9 is not good enough, LX7 Lens is the best. If Panasonic can give this cameras better than F4 is good. 2. Price $ 500 is too high for this camera. $ 350-400 is good price 3.Low light. I really hope panasonic put the money on improving the sensor to make it work better on low light. On low light panasonic sensor performance below competitor. Panasonic always need better lens to help this.
Direct link |
Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:19:15 UTC
as 24th comment
| 2 replies
I just want to ask: 1. Why no button ? at least On OFF 2. I wish there is interval control 4. I wish the design is better and also the clip and also better if we can download photos for online viewing without renting the storage and others
Direct link |
Posted on Mar 14, 2013 at 01:26:50 UTC
as 21st comment
mzynfo: I see this monitor very usefull for Photo editing, where you can see the whole picture in 100%. It's "just" 390px per inch. A little bit more than Apple's retina. I would like to have it!!!
Try to use it and you will get the icon of your photo editor become tiny. and difficult to see
Direct link |
Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 16:43:52 UTC
plamens: What nonsense? The highest HD tv broadcast is 1080i (1920×1080p), HD 1080i movie, even compressed is at least 10 gb... So compressed HD 1080i movie will be 160gb, uncompressed at least 640gb !!!!!!!
Soon will be changed. in next year I believe many will use higher resolution. Not today
Direct link |
Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 16:40:06 UTC
Jakarta, Indonesia
I just see the flash position.
is the flash position correct ?
I afraid many times finger will be blocking the flash.
especially when we ask someone else to take the picture for us.
what is your opinion ?
Cailean Gallimore: Another rubbish camera to forget about.
Can you explain it more clear. why you say rubbish ?
rb59020: No f1.4 lens, no 4k video? No way!
wait for 1-2 days from now and check back later.
Now it still very expensive
Simon97: Interesting camera if the lens can deliver a good image.
Better sensor is more important on the panasonic cameras. this is the weakest part on panasonic cameras.
Leica Lens always good
tkbslc: I think people are making the wrong comparisons here. This is not a competitor to the G15, LX7, XZ-2, etc. This is a competitor to the S110. Basically it goes like, "Do you like the S110 but wish it had nearly double the zoom and a viewfinder?" or maybe even "Like the RX100, but willing to trade some high ISO performance for a bit more zoom and a viewfinder in a slimmer body?"
I get the feeling everyone thinks there should be one camera template that all companies follow. I'm glad we have options.
Lets wait what Panasonic will offer on LX9
Can we discuss about LX9 on the forum ? :)
mpgxsvcd: Why would anyone buy this for $500 when the LX7 was $280 last week. I can walk forward the extra few steps to save $220.
I agree LF1 Price is too expensive.
You have choice to buy LX7 or wait for the LF1 available on market.
Or maybe also wait for LX9.
Send panasonic for LX9 Wish list, I hope they hear our suggestion, if many of us sending the suggestion
dickg1: If Panasonic thinks this camera is going to seriously compete with the Canon S110 in attracting the "enthusiast" crowd, they screwed up big time!
In my mind, the feature that sets the Canon S110 apart from the majority of its peers is a 24mm wide end.
I recently sold my S95 and bought the S110 for just that reason. I'd much rather give up a 200mm long end to get a 24mm wide angle. The difference between 24mm & 28mm is much greater than the diffeence between 120mm and 200mm.
dickg1
I hope next time more cameras will have 24mm or maybe 20mm
dale thorn: Did everyone miss the huge differences? This is MUCH smaller and lighter than the LX7. And has a viewfinder.
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=panasonic_dmclx7&products=panasonic_dmclf1
298 g vs 192 g
111 x 68 x 46 mm (4.37 x 2.68 x 1.81″) vs 103 x 62 x 28 mm (4.06 x 2.44 x 1.1″)
But
Less battery life, Less Exposure compensation
Less Flash range, Less Exposure modes
Slower Lens, White balance presets 4 vs 5
Unknown Number of focus points
utomo99: On some part of LF1 is good, but
1. F5.9 is not good enough, LX7 Lens is the best. If Panasonic can give this cameras better than F4 is good.
2. Price $ 500 is too high for this camera. $ 350-400 is good price
3.Low light. I really hope panasonic put the money on improving the sensor to make it work better on low light. On low light panasonic sensor performance below competitor.
Panasonic always need better lens to help this.
For LF1 Panasonic need to improve the Venus engine to make it better work on light, but still keep the details.
Without this, LF1 will not be success.
On some part of LF1 is good, but
1. F5.9 is not good enough, LX7 Lens is the best. If Panasonic can give this cameras better than F4 is good.
2. Price $ 500 is too high for this camera. $ 350-400 is good price
3.Low light. I really hope panasonic put the money on improving the sensor to make it work better on low light. On low light panasonic sensor performance below competitor.
Panasonic always need better lens to help this.
I hope they can sell the technology to cameras manufacturer. so it can be built in
Why DIGIC 5 ? Why Not DIGIC 6 ?
Canon SX270 HS using DIGIC 6
utomo99: I think main Go pro problems is the lens distortion.
They need to reduce this.
so the videos look better.
Not many people need a matrix like effect.
but many are need good videos
Not all the time people use this for surfing . sometimes we use for other purpose and need NO fish eye effect
I wish there is option
I think main Go pro problems is the lens distortion.
They need to reduce this.
so the videos look better.
Not many people need a matrix like effect.
but many are need good videos
I just want to ask:
1. Why no button ? at least On OFF
2. I wish there is interval control
4. I wish the design is better and also the clip
and also better if we can download photos for online viewing without renting the storage
and others
Many user need good battery life.
Many manufacturer forget about this.
and also Android need to optimize the update.
Too many update and also too big. It eats the Internet quota and also battery
mzynfo: I see this monitor very usefull for Photo editing, where you can see the whole picture in 100%. It's "just" 390px per inch. A little bit more than Apple's retina. I would like to have it!!!
Try to use it and you will get the icon of your photo editor become tiny. and difficult to see
plamens: What nonsense?
The highest HD tv broadcast is 1080i (1920×1080p), HD 1080i movie, even compressed is at least 10 gb...
So compressed HD 1080i movie will be 160gb, uncompressed at least 640gb !!!!!!!
Soon will be changed.
in next year I believe many will use higher resolution.
Not today
plasnu: Ok, I will wait for 8k, and pass 4k.
16K coming soon. and then followed by 32K
I wish many display manufacturer look at other opportunity:
Low energy display but color.
such as color eInk, but:
Better color
Faster
it has huge market. from ebook reader, tablet, mobile phone and others.
Current products is not good enough. so it did not success