ThorKre

Samsung has a very nice selection of affordable lenses an the bodies are getting better and better - but I really don't want to mess with raw files again, so I really hope they worked on their...

I have the E-PM1 (and that fantastic 45mm, btw) too, and I was waiting for an update of the 20mm because of the slow AF. Now it seems like the Olympus 17mm could fit the bill, albeit a bit wider...

I could order one from Amazon Germany, they showed several in stock about a week ago - I backed out before they could ship it because I thought the price of EUR 79,- was too high.Too bad, I'd...

I have no idea what's going on between companies on that level, but if there's really some exchange of components etc. this will be a good thing for both companies. Lenses, IBIS, jpeg processing...

Hope so, I'd really like the key line filter of the M5...

Too bad, I was hoping for more manual controls. And no kit with the new 17mm, which was expected because of the high price of this lens. The only good thing about the new Pens is the sensor, in my...

If that 22mm is as good wide open as the Lumix 20mm, it would be a really nice package. Registration distance is the same as on Sony's NEX though, much shorter than the NX mount...I have to...

...as expected: http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-new-15mm-comes-combined-with-new-e-pmx-model/ Makes sense, and I really like it - there won't be a body only option anyway and it'll be cheaper than the...

If it's really cheap and sharp (diffraction?), I'd give it a try and put it on my PM1 for a super pocket camera - even the 14mm is a tad too bulky for my pockets.I guess it'll be one of the kit...

I want an Olympus with the new sensor and a built in EVF for a cheaper price than the E-M5 - don't think it'll happen as long as the M5 flies off the shelves.

I thought the PL would be discontinued/fused with the P because it's too close to the PM. Maybe the P will beome a tad smaller and lighter, but I don't think it'll disappear.

Sorry, I was talking about the speed of contrast AF on the first models capable of it (x20 series).

It's a nice focal length for a prime, and that lens is fast and small, I think it's a very good decision by Canon and a good start for the system - but one nice prime and a the kit zoom would not...

Canon was in a very good position - as the last big company to join the mirrorless market, they could evaluate what other systems lacked/what consumers wanted and still achieve a big share of the...

I'm not loyal to any brand and would happily jump ship to Canon if they had a better camera for my needs, but painfully slow AF and such a MSRP for an entry level camera without an EVF (option) or...

Fully agree with the first part of your post.Canon seems to be on the right track though, in my opinion. The lens on the pic is quite interesting, F2 sounds nice for an APS-C pancake, IF it is of...

...if the mount diameter is the same, doesn't it? Imressive, can't wait for example pictures.

Don't care about the lack of manual controls or EVF - that won't define the new standard, Canon will (might, should) release a prosumer model sooner or later. This looks like a much better approach...

Do you regard MFT as "small sensor" too? The big plus for MFT is that it allows relatively shallow dof with reasonably fast and cheap primes. I guess a 1" sensor will be good enough in regards of...

NX has some nice (and small - I'm looking at you, Sony!) lenses, but the combination of slow RAW writing speeds and suboptimal jpeg engine kills the system for me. I'd love to see what Oly could...