Clint Dunn

Clint Dunn

Lives in Canada Vancouver, Canada
Joined on Dec 2, 2008

Comments

Total: 292, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Arpad Lukacs: Can we just agree that these are very beautiful images, but are not photographs.

Who cares.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 02:31 UTC
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)
In reply to:

wudyi: This is great. I can sell some of the cameras I never use and get this one which I'll never use after the requisite brick wall shots. LOL!

Don't forget to post a pic of your cat before you sell it.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 05:48 UTC
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: This is a camera trying to fix something that isn't broken. We don't need dials for these settings as they are better and faster controlled in other ways. This must be the camera for the mid-life crisis men in their 50s and 60s even 70s who want to try to "re-claim" their youth... and pay for it!

There are already countless cameras with all the adjustments buried in menus...what's wrong with a practical alternative for real photographers. This new X looks good to me.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 05:48 UTC
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)
In reply to:

T3: Well, I'm not really for cameras that have huge space-hogging dials dedicated to things like ISO or shutter speed (which can just as easily and efficiently occupy a space on an LCD screen), but at least they didn't go overboard with knobs, dials, and switches like Nikon did with the Df. As far as looking like a "classic" camera, it certainly looks like a handsome camera, and thanks to being mirrorless, it'll be more similarly sized to a classic camera than the chunky, fat Df. So I think this new Fuji is much more in the spirit (and size) of a "classic" SLR than the Df is, even though it's not an SLR at all.

...then buy an X-A1

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 05:44 UTC
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)
In reply to:

JackM: It would take a lot of other features and capability to get me to give up an OVF. I hope this does not mean the end of the XPro.

I agree with Jim...I was always a long time fan of the OVF and didn't think I could move to EVF..but I was wrong. The XPro OVF was so innacurate with the framelines that I gave up on it and now use the EVF 90% of the time....and it's grown on me.

With the latest FW the framelines are more accurate...but it depends on which lens you have mounted. My 35mm is quite close but the framelines with the 23mm are pretty brutally inaccurate.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 05:40 UTC

Whine, whine, whine.....don't want the grip, don't buy it. Don't like the cost, don't buy it. Don't like the ergonomics of the camera and don't want a grip...yup you guessed it...don't buy it!

Really...if there is anything to complain about it's the people who bought the original XPro1 grip that didn't allow memory card and battery access...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 19, 2014 at 02:36 UTC as 5th comment
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

tipple: One thing is apparent from these images, if Fujifilm enters the full frame market, with the results achievable with the XTrans sensor or even their conventional Bayer sensor, Canon and Nikon will have to keep on their toes! Fujifilm has demonstrated very good support in updating lens and cameras for their customers. It is apparent they are in this for the long haul and that bodes well for all photographers.

Not all of the FW patches from Fuji were for bugs...some of them were to provided additional functionality...like focus peaking.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 20:39 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)

Awesome looking lens but why oh why couldn't Fuji build a lens hood along the lines of the one for the 35mm 1.4....smaller and metal. I realize the hood needs to be a bit bigger for the 23mm but this thing is a monstrosity.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:44 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

evandijken: But that price...!!

Joelmusician...we all know the X100S is a great camera...but the problem is that it doesn't mount so well to the end of my XPro1.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:40 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

stupidisanart: Anyone else have an issue with fuji with reliability?

Yes...me. When I bought my XPro1 and 35mm 1.4 the lens stopped working in the first 3 hrs I used it....the AF would try to work but something disengaged within the lens body.

That was two years ago....everything been good since (with a replacement lens).

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:37 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alastair Norcross: Looks pretty good. Maybe even as good as the Canon EF-M 22mm F2 pancake, and only 9 times the price. I suppose you pay a lot for that extra stop (and size and weight).

Yes...and just think, you get to connect that plastic EF-M lens to that inspiring EOS-M that is flying off the shelves.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:35 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

justinwonnacott: The lack of chromatic aberration and minimal distortion looks impressive, too bad about the sensor and its chronic softness. Nice legs - shame about the face - The monks.

I've shot thousands of images with my XPro1 too...and very rarely do I get a soft pic or an image otherwise ruined by the 'watercolour' effect.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:33 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R real-world samples gallery article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: Like (almost) all Fuji lenses it's obviously excellent. But if I was that excited about a 35mm lens to spend this much, I'd just get the X100. I don't dispute that 35mm is a great general purpose focal length but for portraits and out of focus backgrounds? To each his own.

Dude...the lens is for people like me who bought an XPro1/E1....it's not like many of us would buy the 23(35)mm as our only lens..

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 19:29 UTC
On DxO releases Optics Pro 9.1 article (38 comments in total)

Seriously...still no Fuji XTrans support????

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 17:09 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On Swimming with the Nikon 1 AW1 article (199 comments in total)

Is it just me or does anyone else think it's just pure lunacy to take an ILC camera underwater without using a dedicated diving case?? Not in a million years would I trust the lens gasket to keep water out....or to submerge the camera in salt water...just crazy.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2013 at 22:06 UTC as 27th comment | 5 replies
On Rare photos of Rolling Stones emerge from estate sale article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

deeohuu: "Rare photos". What an odd phrase. What is rare about them? Think about it. Any definition that sort of works means that the vast majority of photos are "rare".

@deeohuu: Don't be so daft...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2013 at 16:57 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year - Part 1: Fujifilm X100S article (307 comments in total)
In reply to:

whtchocla7e: 35mm is good for 95% of my photography. The other 5% I can live without;

I can live without expensive gear sitting unused on the shelf just because I thought I may need it for that 5%. Got to trim down the fat.

I totally agree about excessive gear....I recently sold a 100mm macro (awesome lens) because I never used it, and a couple of Leica lenses that I was holding on to 'just in case' I ever bought another Leica rangefinder.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 21:28 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year - Part 1: Fujifilm X100S article (307 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: Fuji is rumoured to be following Sony and releasing both a fixed lens FF camera (RX1/R competitor) and an FF ILC and lenses based on their existing mount. It will be interesting if they are able to extrans those sensors.

Come on now Abrasive....if Fuji released a full frame version of the X100, or even better an XPro1...it would sell like hotcakes. Why do you think the Sony A7 was such a big deal.....(hint, it's the full frame sensor).

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 21:25 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

ulfie: OMG ... $799 for a plain-vanilla 35mm f2.8 lens. That's not good. Period.

Dimit....it depends on the performance. If...and I mean IF it performs to the Zeiss name then ok, maybe it's worth it. BUT, when you can buy a Canon 35mm f2 with IS for $550......then price is a valid question.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 21:16 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

hip2: still no GPS, and still the same viewfinder resolution :(
a letdown

weather sealed body is nice though !

...and still no coffee maker....what a pile of junk. Maybe at 41 I'm just too old to understand why GPS is considered such an important feature for a camera.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 21:03 UTC
Total: 292, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »