Light theme [beta]
We're testing a lighter alternative to the regular DPReview theme. Both options will stay.
For more information, click here. Don't forget to leave some feedback.

mick232

Joined on Oct 23, 2011

Comments

Total: 240, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (849 comments in total)
In reply to:

mick232: As for the RAW compression issue - the same compression algorithm is used in the A99 and other Sony cameras such as the RX1. Not the dpreview review of the A99 nor any other review I am aware of has found this to be an issue when they reviewed the A99.

Now that there is a hype around the issue all over, it suddenly is a big deal even in reviews. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

The A7S review points out the benefits of compression (smaller files, higher write speed). That part was unfortunately omitted in the A7II review.

The review also fails to clearly point out that the issue is not a general problem with A7II RAW files but affects a diminishingly small subset of all RAW images in extreme cases. ("Unfortunately, one persistent issue with Sony Raw files might limit the usability of Raw files, particularly when pushed.")

Millions of images have been taken with Sony cameras for years without anybody noticing the issue, including reviewers. It was first mentioned in 2014. Now it is presented as a problem that everybody knew about for ages ("Raw compression issues we've seen from lossy compression in many Sony cameras").

Much of the excitement about this issue is probably not even due to the practical implications of it but the contradiction of marketing claims ("14 bit RAW") and technical reality, which one could rightfully criticize.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 23:30 UTC
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (849 comments in total)

As for the RAW compression issue - the same compression algorithm is used in the A99 and other Sony cameras such as the RX1. Not the dpreview review of the A99 nor any other review I am aware of has found this to be an issue when they reviewed the A99.

Now that there is a hype around the issue all over, it suddenly is a big deal even in reviews. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 18:57 UTC as 123rd comment | 8 replies
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (849 comments in total)
In reply to:

DenisBBergeron: How Sony Camera sensor can be worst than Nikon or Canon sensors ? Sony make sensors for both !

@Rishi Sanyal: if the isue shows up fairly frequently as you say, then why wasn't the issue noticed in the DPR A99 review? It uses the same cRAW compression algorithm as the A7 series.

In fact, 14-bit RAW is praised as an advantage of the A99 in that review. My theory is: there was no hype around this so-called issue back then, therefore nobody cared about it.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 18:43 UTC
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (849 comments in total)
In reply to:

DenisBBergeron: How Sony Camera sensor can be worst than Nikon or Canon sensors ? Sony make sensors for both !

It doesn't get any truer the more often that myth is repeated. Lossy compression may cause slight degradation in extreme cases, but gets blown way out or proportion in the review and these comments.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2015 at 19:57 UTC
On article Sony Alpha a7 II Review (849 comments in total)

The different scores in image quality compared to D750 seems to be blown way out of proportion by DPR. Besides, the 6D has higher scores than the A7II which totally contradicts what the review text says.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2015 at 19:56 UTC as 202nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Bhima78: Mind boggled that the A7 II wins over the D750. Even though I have fully converted to mirrorless, if I had to buy a high end ILC, i'd get the one that actually has an amazing native lens library. Taken as a system, the D750 is leagues better.

It is "best product of 2014" not "what is your favorite system".

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 20:14 UTC
On article Samyang launches 135mm f/2.2 lens for stills and video (151 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: The point of this lens is that it is supposed to be a high quality lens without a high quality price. There is no way of knowing if it really is a high quality lens yet. However, its price does look attractive. For movie shooters manual control is all they need.

@helltormentor I doubt the Canon is better than the Sony Zeiss 135/1.8

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2015 at 20:13 UTC
On article Not dead yet: Sony announces three A-mount lenses (120 comments in total)
In reply to:

steelhead3: The lens is G rated...higher than the Zeisses.

Sony usually uses a G branding for zooms and the Zeiss branding for primes. Look at their latest investor relations presentation, it is explained there. Both are high quality brandings, and you can't make assumptions about one or the other being of higher quality.

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2014 at 01:06 UTC
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Wait...I thought they closed their studio! Someone step on this slug and put it out of it's misery. Hassleblad has become a total joke.

Yes the design studio is closed - they found that asking the cleaning lady to design the camera will give them exactly the same result as asking the design studio. We may still see more of this stuff!

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2014 at 23:46 UTC
In reply to:

jtan163: Oly and Sony's partner ship pays off for Sony.
This will be a total monster for adapting lenses.
When the A7sII comes out it will be an even more incredible video camera.

@mister_roboto: you can probably also tell us that an Airbus is a Boeing design, right? They basically look the same after all.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 19:29 UTC
In reply to:

ZoranHR: Big attention this camera gets. I would like Sony system continue to improve,there is a space. So far I m not interested.
Battery life is poor. Also I would like to have an oportunity and see how it feels in hand with some proper glass. I m afraid FF lenses are heavy and whole package is akward to hold. But that I would have to see.

So you are telling us you do not buy an otherwise great camera because of what you call poor battery life? Seriously? You do know that batteries are exchangeable and cost next to nothing, right?

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 19:27 UTC
In reply to:

topstuff: So this has the IQ of a Nikon D750 in a much smaller package and a great EVF.

Whats not to like?

If Sony expand the lens range ( a fast 35mm prime please ) this would be perfect.

I wish my D810 had an EVF. Maybe the 2nd generation A7 is the answer.

I think the A7 was always worth waiting for the 2nd generation.

Isn't the Zeiss Loxia 35mm F2 fast enough?

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 19:23 UTC
In reply to:

Vasiliy Ivanov: Still no Fuji, this is not acceptable, bad soft.

It is acceptable for anyone except Fuji users.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2014 at 00:09 UTC
On article Sony launches support program for pro photographers (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

dbo: Why is it mandatory to be a pro photographer?

I am advanced enthusiast, owning A900/A99/A7R/A7S and all G/Z lenses except 35G/70300G/500G.
Not enough to be recognized as a support-worthy customer. Unbelievable.

F..k o.f, Sony...

-

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

MediaDigitalVideo: Can you use it as tennisball ?

Yes - but only once.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 23:49 UTC
In reply to:

Frank_BR: Yes, human eyes also have liquid elements and variable lenses. Maybe you have two Canon lenses but never knew that.

Could be true - my eyes are getting worse and worse as time goes by.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2014 at 23:21 UTC
In reply to:

mick232: Once people start getting laughed at because they are shooting with Canon gear, the alarm bells should be rining.

@CheetahCJ: sure, but it is the amateurs who bring revenue.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2014 at 21:22 UTC

Once people start getting laughed at because they are shooting with Canon gear, the alarm bells should be rining.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2014 at 18:15 UTC as 33rd comment | 5 replies

This is really pathetic. Nothing to see here, please move along!

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 23:56 UTC as 205th comment
On article Post-Photokina polls - Tell us what you think (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sonyshine: 1" sensors hit a sweet spot for me. A great compromise between speed, size and IQ.

I wouldn't compromise on IQ. The higher the better. But of course, you could be different minded.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 11:12 UTC
Total: 240, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »