cordellwillis

Why? It's an option. I like options. I opted not to "rent" the software. Some day I might decide to do so.

No matter what, everything will have some form of flaw. I'm sure there are valid reasons to choose what they did. Unless you can see into the future even what you suggest here is not 100% hacker...

A bunch of stupid comments here. Do any of you bank online? It can happen anywhere.

justinwonnacott, I thought the software was still available to purchase outright. I know of people who have CS6. I'd like to know what you can't purchase without the subscription....I don't...

I've used Photoshop for many years, though never Elements. I have to agree with ENicolas about PaintShop Pro. It's a very good program and is very intuitive. I have a knew love for image...

You every firmware updated a Canon camera? What's the difference?

I completely agree with CybrSlydr. The benefits of the newer bodies is the LCD. Image quality wise, the 20D with good to great glass is still a wonderful camera when compared to the others. I still...

JDThomas makes VERY good points. Since the Sigma is a lens in a class of it's own how can the range be a con? "Con" against what? Against a FF 24-70, 17-55, ....? Ok, so the flip side of those is...

Is this something Sony invented? No one in the world saw such a feature prior to Sony?

You were asked questions, not "attacked". A narrow mind is an option too. There's nothing wrong with that since that's what it is. Good...or unfortunate for you!

I don't understand what the purpose is of making these famous photographs in color.
> You're over thinking it.

They weren't shot in color so we will never know for sure if the colors are correct...

I don't understand what the purpose is of making these famous photographs in color.

> You're over thinking it.

They weren't shot in color so we will never know for sure if the colors are correct...

Life must be difficult for you to see people with different ideas and thought processes.

Wow. Such a narrow mind on what others should do with their time. You consider someone a "pseudo artists" because they wanted to see what the b&w images would look like if they were actually...

Perhaps because not everyone see's things the way you do.

Did you think maybe the 'intended it to be' was the only option available at the time (or financial expense). Do you know 100% for sure...

Yeah, they are totally blind to all other things in life. I call it narrow minded.

You, me, and everyone else on here typed a reply of some sort regarding this story. What kind of time and energy did we not waste? Was it productive and interesting?

Just because YOU don't see it in this group doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

AA may be a fan of many, but I bet the photo that Margaret Bourke-White means more to others...such as myself. I really...

You're really over thinking this. That's like complaining because someone chose to paint their classic car red over the black it originally was.

I disagree! You think color photos today look realistic with skin tones and porcelain smooth skin?

There are far too many film types (digital "enhancement") to complain about. Maybe you don't care...