I thought this was a great picture, and the only one I rated at 5 stars. Guess I was a bit out of step with other voters since there were only two other pictures I really liked, and they finished 58th and 59th.
Yours was the image that I felt best exemplified the theme. Nicely done.
gfa5775: The concept should be what you can do with the cheap F/1.8 50mm lens, not the body it is on or relative mathamatical focal lengths.
I disagree. I've heard the term "nifty fifty" used at least since the 1970's and was typically used to acknowledge how useful the sometimes-derided 50mm kit lens could be. Not only was it reasonably fast (even low-cost models were about f/1.7 to f//2), it was usually optically among the best lenses in most manufacturers' lineups, was reasonably-priced, and provided a very useful, normal field of view. As Streetphoto pointed out below, the range of 40-60mm equivalent is also "normal" (Tamron's website says the same), and standard kit lenses I've seen ranged from 45mm to 58mm. A 50mm lens on an APS-C body is no longer a "nifty fifty" in the sense it was meant years ago because it no longer has the extremely versatile normal field of view.
Miwok: Wrong title for this challenge. If it's a 25 or 35mm, is not anymore a Nifty FIFTY!
Part of what makes a "nifty fifty" nifty is its field of view, so the focal length needs to be adjusted to match different sensor sizes.
People are free to do what they want with their own pictures, I suppose, but I find the continuing trend of withdrawing entries after the voting has ended to be disappointing. I often go back to older challenges to enjoy some favorite photos again, but in this challenge, two of the three images I liked best have been withdrawn (those finishing in 35th and 44th place). Oh well, at least I still have "Morning frost & mist" to enjoy (which finished 10th, jointly).
himotep: Dear ConanFuji, Idon't undertand why i've been dql. Rules said no bw nor sepia foto, my entry is partially desaturated. Can you explain, please?
Thanks for that explanation; I was a bit concerned that my voting was out of keeping with the challenge's intent when I rated pictures with reduced saturation a bit higher, viewing them as having a more retro look.
I should have picked up on the selective desaturation idea when you wrote that himotep "rubbed out" some colors that were there.
Just curious, ConanFuji--in a post below you wrote, "I would prefer a shot old car post processed to have that retro look." As I look at pictures using older color processes (such as Autochrome), they appear to have much less intense color than what pops out of a modern digital camera. Of course, I haven't seen the image in question, but wouldn't some de-saturation be appropriate to attaining that retro look?
Outstanding picture! But I guess I was the only one who saw it that way.
Arnie C Rose: As I scrolled through and voted, I noticed that many of these images are not really portraits, but candid images and "street" shooting on the beach. I submitted a "more formal" portrait-style image.
Not sure what the challenge host had in mind.
There are definitely different ideas about what a portrait is. I like this definition from Wikipedia:
"A portrait is a painting, photograph, sculpture, or other artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expression is predominant. The intent is to display the likeness, personality, and even the mood of the person. For this reason, in photography a portrait is generally not a snapshot, but a composed image of a person in a still position. A portrait often shows a person looking directly at the painter or photographer, in order to most successfully engage the subject with the viewer."
In any portrait challenge, the closer an image gets to meeting the criteria in that definition, the higher I rate it.
The host said, "Show us the food that makes your mouth water." I guess my idea of mouthwatering food is different than the norm as most of my favorites finished below 100th place. Lots of nice pictures, though.
The most tantalizingly delicious-looking entry in the challenge! I can practically smell and taste them just looking at that picture.
Nice picture and great title. One of my favorites in this challenge.
DougSchuch: I think we should give them all one half star since they really have nothing to do with Eagle's Nest, New Mexico. That way we'll have the first challenge where all the images are winners with the lowest possible rating. We have a chance to make history here.
That makes sense to me--half-stars it is. I enjoyed the pictures I saw when doing a web search for images of Eagle Nest, New Mexico.
janeenadamsmartin: Great, natural photo and a caption that captures the essence of the photo's attitude. I wish sunset was more apparent
I agree with janeenadamsmartin, and this was my favorite picture in the challenge. Though perhaps the sunset could have been more apparent, the warm tones plus the angle and length of shadows let us know the sun was getting low in the sky.
Great image and great title!
Even though I have no idea who this person is, I find it a very compelling portrait. Thanks for entering it.
Strange voting results in this challenge, but yours was one of two images that I thought really exemplified the theme.
Just wanted to say I really liked your picture. It was one of my five favorites in this challenge.
Phojoto: I don't understand why people are filling up uIe achallenge with photos of cars.
Some people find cars beautiful and worth their attention. Car shows and car museums sell a lot of tickets in my area.