NCB: I have a Df. Love it. It's exactly the sort of controls I want to use, and the output's great. Don't understand DPR's remarks about duplication; there are more typical DSLR controls there if you want to use them, but you don't have to. A film camera user would take to the Df in an instant.
It's never a camera for everyone; other cameras do some things better. However, compare for a moment your example output for the Df and the A7RII. To me the Df's output is magic; the A7RII's is crude. I respect the A7RII for what it does, but for quality real-world output I'd look to Nikon, Canon, or indeed Pentax.
Every one of these cameras can deliver terrific results. I own D810, Df, D800 and so on. They all focus great and rarely fail, with the D800 being the least reliable. So the only thing left is which camera feels best in MY hands. The rest is all nonsense in most cases. That's why the Df has become my most used body.
The D750 is now Nikon's best overall body, assuming speed and reasonable size/weight factor in to your needs. It's less to carry than my D800 and has more resolution than my Df.My Df and D800 (and certainly the D810) still have areas where they're better, but the D750 is the most complete package of features in a small body to date.
Unless you need crazy resolution or crazy speed, a D750 is likely the best camera you can buy at any price.
Sorry to say that stopping at 75mm is a no-go on this otherwise neat little camera. 75mm is not all that wonderful for portraits for starters. I own the Nikon P7700 and I use the sharp results on the longer end all of the time. 75mm makes this okay for street and family, but leaves out too much to be taken seriously as an all arounder.
24mm isn't all that wide either, so what we have hear is a camera with optics that simply aren't all that exciting.
Digital Suicide: Df best DSLR? You got to be kiddin me...
Try one and see if you like it.
Nice try, wisep01, but the Df is a hit already when you consider that it's a niche product. It's hardly a distant second when you remember that it's a 2700 dollar body up against more mainstream stuff. I'm a pro shooter and virtually everyone I know is ordering one at this point. Those who understand the D4 sensor (and the Df is better still) know why they want this little DSLR. I've already tested the AF of the Df against my D800 and there was no real-world difference. The Df AF is just as good as the D610 of course. Keep an eye out for my review next week and comparison shots in low light.
Happily, the cameras in the lead should be. The Pentax is quite good and I just ordered a Df (or rather my wife did) after trying a friends for an evening. The Df is beautiful, ideal if you already own a D800. D610 and D7100 are also solid, if less than thrilling upgrades. I voted for the Df because it's the only thing on the list that's really trying something new. The interface is truly enjoyable and flexible and the sensor is gorgeous. Packed in the smallest FX body around it's very easy to fall for the Df. As expected spec hunters don't "get it" but they aren't usually photographers anyway.
HawaiiVolcanoes: This type of advertising..in my experience...has ALWAYS yielded...a "whole lot of nothing"....I have avoided Nikon like the Plague for years...I don't want to hear about their 5000 year old legacy of building cameras..they suck...their small cameras suck..their dslr's (for the VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE) suck. They probably realized that the FM2n is the most popular camera they have produced in many years and are <trying> something/anything to capitalize upon that. I shoot with Canon and Sigma DP Merrill.....Nikon..you have absolutely nothing that I could ever want. Goodnight
Seriously? You must not earn money with your gear. I owned Canon FX and now own Nikon FX. Both are great systems and do what any working pro shooter requires. A skilled shooter can work with either. For the moment the superior DR and detail of the D800 suits my needs, but Canon is also great.
rfsIII: Awesomeness. Bounce flash is so underutilized and when you hold the camera vertically and bounce the light off a wall you can get beautiful portraits. It's great when Nikon comes out with a great product in spite of themselves.
The D700 really deserves a better flash with a rotating head. Pick up a SB700 or a used SB600.
Uh, folks...with batteries it's about 20% LIGHTER than the SB400. The WHOLE flash head tilts up properly and will bounce better than the SB400 ever did. It's a little less powerful, but this is not going to effect most users. On a P7700 or Coolpix A this is a better flash than a SB400. Sure, my SB800 will still stay with my D800, but this baby flash is slick for my little cams and I'm getting one. The fully tilting head alone makes it a superior design. The SB400 pivoting reflector was always a weak spot.
Not much of a guide. Looks like a plug for Amazon. There's really no info here at all.
Interesting to read all of these comments, many from folks who have not spent time with either. I own the P7700 and I tried the G15 for a week. Bottom line: BOTH are very good compact cameras that do not have the speed to replace my DSLRs. So when people cry about the Nikon being slow I just laugh. I'd shoot myself if I was stuck with either for anything but fairly basic needs. Neither are appropriate for a wedding or really anything too important. BOTH are slow and limited.But with that said I find the P7700 less limiting because of the 200mm lens and slightly sharper output. It's a nice little camera and the speed has NEVER EVER been an issue because I know how and when to use it. The same goes for the G12 I owned. I can do very nice work with the P7700 and the SB800 flash set up off camera and I'm astonished by the excellent video output as well. No, my D800 is not threatened nor is my wife's D7100. Know your tools and stop sweating the little stuff. Cheers!