Lng0004

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Dec 28, 2010

Comments

Total: 91, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony Alpha 7R Review (812 comments in total)

Correction: NEX has always been Alpha. It was Sony Alpha NEX.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 00:42 UTC as 178th comment | 6 replies

The 1020 looks like crap! Whyyyy?

Examine the grassy part. 1020 at ISO 100 (yes, base ISO!) is horribly mushy. One big mess. All other Nokia phones easily kicks its ass.

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 21:55 UTC as 3rd comment | 7 replies
On article VSCO Cam arrives for Android (9 comments in total)
In reply to:

FRANCISCO ARAGAO: Very bad app. Freezing my S3 continuously.

Works fine on my HTC One.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2013 at 05:59 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Alpha 7R samples gallery sample gallery (4 comments in total)

SOOC JPEG with NR on I assume? Looks pretty bad for ISO 800...

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 00:44 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo DSC00152 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

SOOC JPEG with NR on I assume? Looks pretty bad for ISO 800...

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 00:44 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Samyang announces five full frame E-mount lenses (20 comments in total)
In reply to:

ryansholl: Just an FYI to all, and hopefully some will upvote this so others see it:

Hear me out on this - It makes no sense to buy these, and here's why:

These are the same lenses available for other mounts. The 14/2.8 is, for example, the exact same lens as my Sony A-mount 14/2.8, but with a much shorter registration distance simply because they've moved the mount back. The lens itself is dumb (100% manual). It makes no difference to the lens or camera if this lens is designed for the mount or if there's a cheap adapter stuck in between. There are no electrical contacts, it doesn't know the difference.

So, by all means DO buy these lenses - they're great lenses - just realize that if you buy an E mount version you will not be able to use the lenses on any other mount because of flange distance.

Instead, if you buy a Canon, Alpha, Nikon, whatever mount version of these lenses you can then use them with BOTH that mount and equally well on the E mount with a very inexpensive adapter.

+1.

Assuming Samyang did nothing to improve optics and performance.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 20:58 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S4 camera first look: Imaging features (34 comments in total)

Ok, so the S4 camera app seems to kick my One's app's butt, easily. At least I can revel in the fact that my One takes great shots in low light! That is all.

HTC's Panorama mode kinda sucks.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2013 at 04:36 UTC as 15th comment
On article Samsung Galaxy S4 camera first look: Imaging features (34 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zebooka: Nice features! But I do not believe in Android anymore. Only when OS will be updated by Google, not my lazy manufacturers (like HTC). Only when phones will be supported for 3-4 years (3GS iphone only now ends its iOS 6 support). And only when normal backups/restore from the box will exist (without that hacky-DIY things like flashing/fastboot/Titanium)

1. You are given choices. You can stick with Google Nexus devices (which are usually great, and the Nexus 4 raised the bar) and get updates as soon as they are available. How many smartphone choices do Apple give you every year? That's right. Just one. (Nobody's forcing you to buy locked down Android phone from 3rd-party manufacturers.)

2. iTunes backups/restore function isn't that good. Usually has problems with major firmware updates (going from 4.0 to 5.0 etc). Clunky when saving saved games. Aaaand, it's pretty slow.

3. One of the best things I love about Android? Wiping /system doesn't wipe your data on the internal SD card. I can get a fresh restore without losing any downloaded documents, pics etc.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2013 at 04:34 UTC

Here's an easy way to identify smartphone photos in those camera showdowns.

Does it have some sort of vintage effect?
If yes, it's probably a smartphone photo.
If no, go to next question.

Is it square?
If yes, most likely a smartphone photo.
If no, go to next question.

Is depth-of-field from camera to infinity?
If yes, more than likely a smartphone photo.
If no, go to next question.

Is it a bad photo?
If yes, smartphone photo it is.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2013 at 00:54 UTC as 22nd comment

Great shot. Without zooming in, it almost looks like a painting.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2013 at 01:00 UTC as 1st comment

Great stuff but... going fully B&W means you're relying too much on texture and details. But I guess there's no helping it since color reproduction on phones still suck butt.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2013 at 02:53 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies
On Challenge:7940 (2 comments in total)

lol such a passive aggressive way to feel good :))

Posted on Feb 11, 2013 at 04:18 UTC as 1st comment
On article Hands-on with the Sony Xperia Z camera (8 comments in total)

"Despite the large 5-inch screen, it is only marginally larger than my Nexus 4"

This made me laugh. The Nexus 4 has a 4.7-inch screen ;P So of course it's only marginally larger lol.

Awesome phone. I've always been a fan of Sony's designs. Can't wait for this to go on sale in the US.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2013 at 05:27 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
Total: 91, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »