TheEye

TheEye

Lives in United States San Francisco, United States
Works as a tandem horse diver
Joined on Apr 9, 2009

Comments

Total: 74, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Just deployed: New dpreview.com forums system (699 comments in total)

I don't see a post preview any longer. Did this feature get dropped?

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2012 at 05:44 UTC as 81st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

TheEye: At that price, this lens should be one stop faster.

iudex, my point was in regard to PRICE. I have two 35-105 f/2.8 Tamron 35 mm lenses, which cost a more reasonable $600 about 17 years ago.

And yes, there is a 35-100 f/2.0 Zuiko. :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2012 at 02:35 UTC

At that price, this lens should be one stop faster.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2012 at 05:33 UTC as 16th comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

Ann Chaikin: What is the point of rating users? Is it a contest? I can see filtering out those who just want to be trolls but other than that... why?

User ratings implementation will make the most competitive post whores go on sprees.

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 06:52 UTC
In reply to:

rondom: Quantification-mania at dpreview...It started with awards for cameras. Bronze, silver, gold...
Then came percentages....
Then came "likes" for comments
It was time for forums to adopt.
Jimmyprimelens68 silver award 78%
Pros:
-precise answers to questions
- fanboy with a touch of rationality
Cons:
- can get touchy from time to time
Who is he good for:
Enthusiast who is willing to spend fun times at forums
Not so good for:
-seasoned forum professional seeking challenging and combative atmosphere

Great, you just got another "like."

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 06:50 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Interview - Sun Hong Lim of Samsung (99 comments in total)

"You cannot leave the house without a smartphone today."

I feel sorry for him if he feels that way. I don't carry a cellphone. The idea of being connected 24/7 is unappealing to me.

Some people think they'll leave the house without of a phone, only to die because of a flat tire. :-P

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 10:35 UTC as 36th comment | 3 replies
On article Olympus PEN E-PL5 and PEN E-PM2 Hands-on Preview (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheEye: The Mini has the new sensor, but the E-PL5 has the old sensor? What?

Me sad two. ;-)

DPR should not have hurried and taken their time. Quality over speed, right?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 13:49 UTC

1/160 flash sync? How gauche.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 11:52 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
On article Olympus PEN E-PL5 and PEN E-PM2 Hands-on Preview (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

pixelcollector: where is the flippin' E-P4/5 ?
this is not cutting it. cheap looking design, subpar lcd res.

One of the Oly guys said something about something revolutionary regarding one or the other upcoming Pen (finder?). Well, "maybe, maybe not."

Maybe the revolution is the relative low-res display, which due to some trickery, looks twice as good as it should.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 10:04 UTC
On article Olympus PEN E-PL5 and PEN E-PM2 Hands-on Preview (152 comments in total)

The Mini has the new sensor, but the E-PL5 has the old sensor? What?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 09:15 UTC as 64th comment | 7 replies
On photo Quit Fidgeting! in the Switch The Faces of Your Subjects challenge (10 comments in total)

I can't unsee it! :D

Link | Posted on Aug 31, 2012 at 05:18 UTC as 2nd comment

The lens should be 24- 135 equivalent and not slower than 2.5 at the long end. A 28 mm equivalent is just not wide enough for me. The sensor should be a bit larger. Also, an EVF accessory is needed. I wouldn't care if the camera were "too large for a pocket."

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2012 at 19:26 UTC as 33rd comment | 3 replies
On article Evolution of an image (123 comments in total)

While the first shot has possibly some compositional issues, mostly the even splitting of three (four) planes, the shot is effective due to the windblown tree's dynamic and its roots clawing into the green "island of grass." It's a very picturesque image.

Compositionally, the day 2&3 images may be better, but the tree is much less effective compared to the one in the first image.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2012 at 05:50 UTC as 43rd comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5 Hands-on Preview (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Why is the EVF still aligned to the lens? What sense is that? Move the EVF to the left (viewing from back) so people can use the touch focus thing they added.

The finder above the lens means as close to a direct line of sight as possible. Do you see any scopes mounted next to a gun's barrel instead on top of it? ;-)

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 21:18 UTC
On photo burj Khalifa in the DubaiLand challenge (15 comments in total)

That can't be the Moon - it's the unfinished Death Star!

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 04:25 UTC as 1st comment
On article Images of Panasonic GF5 start to appear (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

ybizzle: Yawn...Another generic looking camera without a soul.

You can't dismiss aesthetics completely. And if you intend to draw the "it's just a tool card," well, I'd rather use a nicely made and well finished Rahsol torque wrench than a clunky torque wrench peddled by Sears. Do you care what your food looks like? Or do you eat only tasty mush? ;)

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 03:51 UTC
On photo Sunrise at Marina Piccola in the Ultra Wide Angle Seascapes challenge (1 comment in total)

Lovely shot. Next time have a mermaid sit on the steps! ;-)

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 07:51 UTC as 1st comment

Love the picture at the top of the article: Japan, land of the rising orb!

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2012 at 05:40 UTC as 133rd comment
On article Nikon D4 & D800: What do the Professionals Think? (391 comments in total)
In reply to:

jnk: Considered that D3/s is the camera body that went to outer space where failure rates are not acceptable at this level and you're complaining about a 'wet job'?

Get real about the build of Nikon - Navy Seals used the D700 for their night missions and that should spell out the sealing questions of these bodies.

I'm a Navy seal on a mission to take nighttime underwater pictures of the Anunnaki on Nibiru later this year. :-P

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2012 at 07:27 UTC
On article Nikon D4 & D800: What do the Professionals Think? (391 comments in total)
In reply to:

Telefoto: "In a perfect world, I would have loved to have seen the 24.5MP of the D3X harnessed with the speed and low light capabilities of the D3S. Neither the D4 nor D800 are that camera..."

Yes! As a D3x user, that's my feeling exactly. I've been mystified why no one else seems to voice that view, but I guess it's because there are very few D3x users on the forums. So, for all the 12 MP shooters here, I guess the D4 looks like an upgrade (stills wise) and the D800 looks like ... I dunno exactly, but it's some kind of step forward even though it breaks with the purpose of the D700 (high ISO shooting). But, I can't help thinking this strange D800 broke the bank. Witness for instance that even in DX mode, it's a step back in FPS from the D3 generation. That's strange and rather unwelcome to me.

"one time more pixels"? As in 1x2= 3? :-P

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2012 at 07:24 UTC
Total: 74, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »