Ken Aisin

Ken Aisin

Joined on Jun 8, 2011

Comments

Total: 70, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Opinion: Bring on the 70-200mm equivalents article (315 comments in total)

Loving my Sigma 18-35mm F1.8. Waiting for Sigma to make a 50-135mm F1.8 OS.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 04:35 UTC as 50th comment | 1 reply
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (305 comments in total)

Should bring back the OVF with F stops and shutter speed displayed on the bottom. EXR sensor instead of X-trans would be nice too.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 03:47 UTC as 51st comment

Hope Elinchrom will come up with a TTL system too.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2014 at 19:32 UTC as 2nd comment

F**k creative cloud.... back with the non-cloud version please.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2014 at 22:44 UTC as 83rd comment | 3 replies

I voted for the Sigma 18-35mm with my own money. It's an amazing lens for the price. A lens that I will probably never sell. If I had to nitpick, I wish it came with weather sealings and image stabilisation.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2014 at 20:10 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ken Aisin: Where's the EVF?!

Not planning to go underwater with it. Just wanted a rugged compact raw camera with EVF/OVF for outdoor use.

A standard hot shoe there would have saved the day though because I can put my Voigtlander 28mm OVF there. But knowing that Nikon 1 system has its proprietary hotshoe, this will never happen.

Rear LCD just doesn't work for me somehow. I've given it many honest tries.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 23:17 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)

Where's the EVF?!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 04:42 UTC as 59th comment | 6 replies

I wouldn't even bite even if they offered a free subscription. Listen Adobe, I want to own my tools. I don't like to rent my tools.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 22:11 UTC as 64th comment

This is what the P7700 should have been.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 21:51 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply

If it comes with a tripod mount and a wireless remote shutter release, I would get one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 21:50 UTC as 12th comment
In reply to:

historianx: In 30+ years of shooting in all sorts of conditions with Olympus/Zuiko OM and HG/SHG digital lenses never once have I had a failure. Then the digitals do not have that IS bugaboo built into them, to create even more problems. Maybe Canikon should take a lesson from one the world's eminent lensmakers.

I shoot both Nikon and Olympus. Never had a single issue with my Olympus gear. Can't say the same about my Nikon gear. My 85mm F1.4G came with a decentering defect (repaired under warranty.) My 70-200mm VRII's zoom ring stuck after about a year of use (repaired under warranty.) Had a 50 F1.4D that ground louder and louder over time (repair refused because it was supposed to grind that loud according to Nikon. sold.) Had two SB-900s that just died one after another (both repaired under warranty and sold.) My D600 also suffered from the well known oil on sensor issue (sensor cleaned for free by Nikon, subsequent cleaning done by myself.)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 22:48 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: The REAL question is when are they going to produce cameras people want to buy?

Hi happypoppeye, I would expect more F1.4 or faster primes and F2.0 or faster zooms from Olympus and Panasonic.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 01:15 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ken Aisin: I would buy two OM-D bodies if Olympus offered more high end m3/4 zoom lenses. Say, 7-12mm F4.0, 12-35mm F2.0, 35-100mm F2.0, all splash proofed.

By the way, the prime lenses at F1.8 are just not fast enough. Cosina already proved that F0.95 lenses don't have to be huge in size.

True, but it is technically possible. I wouldn't mind the increase in size and weight either for the speed though.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 01:10 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ken Aisin: I would buy two OM-D bodies if Olympus offered more high end m3/4 zoom lenses. Say, 7-12mm F4.0, 12-35mm F2.0, 35-100mm F2.0, all splash proofed.

By the way, the prime lenses at F1.8 are just not fast enough. Cosina already proved that F0.95 lenses don't have to be huge in size.

Unfortunately the 9-18mm is not sealed either.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 23:07 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ken Aisin: I would buy two OM-D bodies if Olympus offered more high end m3/4 zoom lenses. Say, 7-12mm F4.0, 12-35mm F2.0, 35-100mm F2.0, all splash proofed.

By the way, the prime lenses at F1.8 are just not fast enough. Cosina already proved that F0.95 lenses don't have to be huge in size.

The panasonic 7-14mm is not splash proof.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 21:30 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

SirSeth: Well well well. Release an amazing OMD-Pro to replace the E-5 and we'll see if I can help you recover your losses further. ;)

Such OMD Pro should be fully compatible with old 4/3 lenses to begin with.

If Olympus has no plans to update the E-5 with a new sensor, at least give 4/3 users a new m4/3 camera that would function with all their 4/3 lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 21:19 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: The REAL question is when are they going to produce cameras people want to buy?

They did with the OMD EM5. Just not enough fast lenses for that fabulous body.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 21:11 UTC
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)

I would buy two OM-D bodies if Olympus offered more high end m3/4 zoom lenses. Say, 7-12mm F4.0, 12-35mm F2.0, 35-100mm F2.0, all splash proofed.

By the way, the prime lenses at F1.8 are just not fast enough. Cosina already proved that F0.95 lenses don't have to be huge in size.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 21:07 UTC as 71st comment | 8 replies
On Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint article (233 comments in total)

Sad to see the most innovative manufacturer (imho) doing so poorly.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 21:01 UTC as 73rd comment | 1 reply
On Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review article (1201 comments in total)

Love that tiltable evf.

I don't really care about the look of cameras but this one is really good looking. Maybe Leica will add a red dot and sell it for $3500. Lol.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 16:46 UTC as 312th comment
Total: 70, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »