Ron Poelman

Wot, no rangefinder ?
Fail.

What's with the halos along the dolphin's back ?
Can't be default sharpening, Shirley ?

All that's lacking is a surround in RED !!!
20" = slab not tablet.
Try stuffing that one in the briefcase.

+1
No Aftershot in a RAW review ??
Oh, that's right, this is a commercial site.
What a joke.

Thank you for that.
Adblock on or off makes no difference it seems.
Could I ask a favour and get you to check the link I listed above ?

Thanks Richard.
Still not working on my own posts
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50466738,
but works OK on the above samples and on Simon's Test Forum Thread.
Is it fully deployed yet or not ?

hmmm, not working here.
(First click on image does nothing)
Firefox with Adblock.
Do we need to enable something ?

By Henry M. Hertz (56 min ago)
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/cock-a-hoop.html

Zactly,
what's it say about early adopter's remorse ?

It's an ad for a movie franchise, Simon.
No prizes for guessing which.
Yet another carefully targeted, seemingly innocent , cross platform product placement.
A technique which is starting to permeate pretty much any and every media product nowadays.
The issue is, when do we start not trusting the content and reviews here ?
Pay for an independent DPR ?
I wish. Would have been happy to.
But, that horse bolted a while ago.

Another ad,
really, DPR ???

should work well on a mobile phone.
(Cue sound of stable door),
or is that the sound of the old database biting the dust?
Just how it THAT resource going to be integrated into this
for comparing?

Lets hope it finally comes with a zoom
so you can compare cams with different resolutions at 1:1.

How do I search these 677 replies to find out
how to turn on signatures ?
I'm sure it's in here somewhere.

So true.
It smacks of a fairly half-baked marketing ploy
to gain a lot of free inches in the Photo press.
Ultimately, it's a shot in the foot
and confirmation for most of us,
that no, they couldn't be trusted with the future.

Ditto.
A Sony would have provided dry knees !
Swing out screen, in-camera HDR and focus peaking.

Stop talking and start boycotting, time to sort it out.
The big risk is freelancers being squeezed out forever
and replaced with in-house hacks.

When it's all said and done though, is ANY modern entertainment
anywhere near, living up to the over the top hype
that passes for promotion nowadays ?
They either want great photos or they don't
and as their target audience is looking at them on a mobile
phone screen, the answer is pachydermly obvious.

End of an era, hopefully with some kicking.

"Our long term goal is to come every year with attractive new models"

We'll settle for some pricing on this year's ?

Well, that should push RAW software development back 10 years.
Corel will bury it, spend 2 years trying to implement the multi-core
engine into it's own stuff , fail and then give up.
It certainly explains why no bug fixing has been done in the last
two years.
Maybe, Stephens will release Bibble 4 to Open Source,
it would ease some of the pain.

It's what the camera industry has been hanging out for.
A genuinely hilarious company.
It's hard to criticise while you're ROFL.

Take a perfectly good shot.
Store it.
Make a copy and fuzz it up.
Show it to the world.
Let the rubes press their buttons to do a simple cut and paste
and set their little techie tails aquiver.
Profit.