SergioMO: Why is it for ???? Want to take a real photo ? Sony RX100 or something like that ! Don´t waste your time.
You didn't even look at the pictures, did you?
undergrounddigga: Will be interesting to see how will Apple cope with the competition. The others are much more open to collaboration (e.g. Sony-Zeiss, Nokia-Nikon?). Apple has a huge ego, and probably would be time to put that aside and build some lenses with Leica or Olympus. At the moment, they are kind of falling in the same mistake Nokia has, when they didn't realise the power of smartphones. Lots of people will buy certain phones, just because of their better photo capabilities.Not that I really care, I buy phones every 8 years, and I really hope I won't have to change mine for another 6 years.. :) From a business perspective however, will be interesting to see where is Apple going to be in 5-10 years time. I do use apple products, such as their personal computers.. absolutely love them. Maybe they have built such a strong computer and music (iTunes, iPod) market that until someone major challenged those, they will always be ok
Well, with Android 5 Google will probably open the entire image processing pipeline to OEMs and developers, so I guess that camera apps will be able to implement their own algorithms. I don't understand why it took so long for Google to realize that this step is absolutely necessary, anyway if they really do it Android will offer someting that the even the iphone or WP do not offer, that is, every camera app will be really different and won't just be a different interface like it is now. Then, Android users will have an incredible choice.And if you have a Nexus 4, Nexus 5 or another high-end smartphone that will be updated to Android 5, you might be able to use those new features, though of course it's simple speculation at this stage (we don't even know if Google will really open the camera API yet).
Apple knows their target audience very well. They don't need the *best* camera, they just need a *very good* camera, and they have it. Camera is just one part of the phone, here in this site we tend to overestimate it, but most users do not buy a phone for the camera alone. Otherwise, the 1020 would be the top-seller around the world, but most people just want a "good enough" camera. That's why the GS4 is the best selling Android smartphone even if it doesn't have the best camera. It has a "good enough" camera.Users that value the camera more than the other functions of the smartphone are a niche. Nokia has been luring those users, but we're taliking about small numbers. What people want is an overall balanced and high quality phone. That's why the Z1 is probably the only one that can compete with the iphone: it has exceptional build quality, top specs, very good camera, good design, and that's why it will sell much more than the 1020.So Apple just has to keep a good balance!
chj: Only thing I'm interested in is sports mode and it isn't even covered. Can I actually get fast shutter speed with this camera?
@chj: if the iPhone doesn't have it, it's a feature and a good thing for ease of use and simplicity of the interface, while if an Android phone doesn't have it, well.. it's a con! That's the general rule! ;)
HarrieD7000: Again an android gadget everyone wants and nobody uses because of the poor quality?
Poor quality? Did you have a look at the G2 camera samples on the Internet?
Very nice results, and regarding the statement that "the optical image stabilization system may produce "different motion blur effects while taking images on a tripod", well... even my Olympus XZ-10 manual says to turn off IOS when the camera is used on a tripod!
JWest: Surely we just need a "movement / still life" button, which switches between prioritising high shutter speed or low ISO? While very few people want to shoot their phone camera on full manual, if they care at all about the quality of their photos, they should be able to manage a simple toggle button.
Sometimes I wonder if all modern software is designed by idiots. This stuff isn't rocket science.
The "movement/still life" button already exists, and it's called "select the appropriate scene mode between sports and portrait"! ;)
Wrong focus point! ;)
Sony has just released a massive firmware update and from the first samples I've seen on the net it seems that the camera quality is so much improved that it almost looks like a different phone.The artifacts you see in the pictures in this review are almost gone. The color balance is also better, more natural. It's unfortunate that Sony didn't optimize its firmware from the beginning... I guess that the final rating of this phone would have been much better with the latest firmware.
I watched the event on youtube, and many features are really impressive.
HDR used not when really needed, but as an instagram-like effect like in this case makes the images boring and makes you wonder if the pictures are really worth.
Looks more like a Canon's design problem if the lens protrudes beyond the point where filters are placed!
I'm sick of vintage pictures, frankly speaking.
maxola67: More 200 posts for K3 and only 60 ones for D610 - Nikon doesn't make interests.
A great part of these 200 posts is from Canikon users looking for self-assurance that their gear is still the best.
The best selling accessory for this camera will be a Pentax logo to cover the Ricoh writing on the back.
Love Las Vegas... this is now my desktop wallpaper! :)
matty_boy: Ive never been a fan of connect, its sits in an awkard no-mans land between serious photography and gadgetry, not really knowing what it should be and sometimes being guilty of very tenuous photographic links to some technology.
I promise i will never visit this site again, having read this review that lists, amongst the bad.
"Less detail in good light than some higher-res sensors"
there it is, insight at its lazy worst - bordering on tautology. And what does 'smallish screen' really add to this, surely (given the 4" size of the iPhone screen being larger than most dedicated cameras) all SLRs and compacts barring the frankly silly galaxy camera, should also have 'smallish screen' listed as a 'bad'. terrible fence sitting review ruined by the awful lazy conclusion
All your words can be summarized with: I'm an Apple fanboy, and I'm angry because you didn't say that the iphone is magical.
Using an Instagram-like effect won't add value to pictures that are not worth much, nor will convince people to buy a 1020.Publishing pictures that are 467x701 pixels is also useless, you could use any decent phone and you wouldn't see the difference.
jcmarfilph: So why no iPhone 5s? It would have been nice to see it being stomped by these cameras.
And FWIW, the nokia night shot is obviously blurry so to include it in the comparison is useless. ISOs should have been fixed to one value for a fair comparison.
Because we've seen hundreds of tests of the iphone already. Accept the fact that we can do without the iphone, at least for once.
completelyrandomstuff: The most annoying service ever. I uploaded bunch of JPGs and it was automaticaly edited, added contrast, auto-levels, unrealistic colors etc. I had then an option of reuploading all 500 shots, or turning 'auto-awesome' features one by one.
Why don't you just turn off those features once for all in the preferences? Ah, right, because you wouldn't be able to complain anymore...