Is that a GM1 or you are happy to see me?
Don't you mean Focus Jumping? The error is all over the review...
Where's the Afghan girl? Can't get enough of it!
nstam: making cameras: youd think they(camera companies) understand photoshop... of course theyre playing games with everyone. why make it easy to discern what it is; todays market works off selling pushing ideas; isnt that marketing?DPReview knows whats hiding, and we're giving it hits. It would be more fun if they didn't follow the 'rumours' and let us play the 'whats next' game. This is one of the leading websites around the world, and they still play games... what happened to old DPR(edited, grammar)
Look below, DPR has said they don't have anything else besides this image, which means that it really must be just a local version of a known camera, not a completely new model.
If it was Olympus, it would be cool.If it was Samsung, it would be ordinary.If it was Sony, it would be bold.If it was Pentax, it would be old news.If it was Hasselblad, it would be tasteless.
But since it's a white Canon, then it's junk.
Meh not enough bokeh.
Frank_BR: This camera is a proof that M43 is the sweet spot of sensor size. What other format allows better combination of high quality of image with small size of camera?
I bet Henri Cartier-Bresson would love the GM1.
No love for Samsung NX!
photo nuts: This is pathetic. DPReview used to chastise websites for leaking news & rumors etc. And now, what do we see? DPReview itself is posting rumors.
They must be desperately trying to generate more web traffic. Let me give DPReview a piece of advice: post MORE timely reviews of cameras and lenses if you want to generate more traffic.
Very sad to see DPReview in its current state.
Dpreview only posts rumors they know are correct. How do they know? Because they have a hands on preview ready to publish.
Hachu21: Just "cosmetic improvements"? are you sure?- new sensor + new image processor- faster autofocus and reduced shooting time lag ( http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/product/cameras/powershot_g16.do )- one of the fastest continuous shooting (9.5fps limited to...one hour)- focus peaking for manual focus on stills and videos- handheld HDR and nightscene- exposure time up to 250s- background defocus mode (2 pictures stacked, not the average "paintbrush style filter")- 60p fullHD moviesWell... if i agree there's no "killer feature", you can't say it's nothing! (and "minor update" is a bit abusive too!)
Funny how some people use 85mm and more for landscapes.
AbrasiveReducer: This is great news for everybody. If Magic Lantern turns out to be popular and trouble-free, Canon can re-evaluate. If it causes problems, it voids the warranty so it's 100% the user's risk. If the user wants Magic Lantern but not the risk, they can rent from LensRentals. Something for everybody.
So it must be good!
zodiacfml: Canon=huge dinosaurThese stuff are uncool.There is little value in adding social media capability even to the avid social media user because why bother if it is still best done on a smartphone especially those with data plans?
Step it up.
Canon S120 starts at 24mm.
Charletti: If Garmin satnavs are anything to go by, downloading updates and firmware is like stepping back into primeval times. Over 4 hours on a fast computer via USB instead of a direct download onto a hard drive then upload onto Garmin hardware. And this with a top model. I'd done my research beforehand but this issue was not addressed. Double check before purchasing.
I don't think the update for my Garmin GPS ever lasted more than 30m. But I live in a small country and it's a relatively cheap model.
chromnd: Is it just me or did you forget to put the link to the gallery in the article?
You mean the Nokia N95 takes photos too!?
Anyone knows if there will be a cine version of the 16mm lens?
jkoch2: But video does not consist of 4 megapixel frame grabs.
If people watch two video samples on You-Tube, both streamed at 5mbps, but one originally based on the 50mbps MOV h.264 files the 5D normally uses, and the other based on 90mbps RAW, which must later be compressed anyway, would they see any difference? Most of the difference would probably owe to other filter effects applied in the edit process. RAW might be more flexible for complex commercial studio editing, but of no more use to anyone else than to have an 18-wheel truck in the driveway.
Read the article. The DR gains are huge.
It's not the camera!
kruezr: We were in London last year with my SX260. I shot many of the same scenes under similar conditions (sunny). After looking at these photos and looking back at the ones I took last year, I don't see a difference worthy of investing in this new camera.
Yes, they all look the same in the LCD don't they?
rb59020: No f1.4 lens, no 4k video? No way!
* zing *
ballwin12: Someone may move back to DX because of this lens.. if it's good, of course.
Oh it's prediction time, here's mine! In 2 years the new APS-C sensors will once again surpass full frame ones. Then you'll have to wait for the D5 and the 2DX to have it reversed back again.
Almeida: I can imagine the ruckus if instead of being APS-C, this was a m4/3 lens 14-26mm f1.4. Or better yet, imagine a Nikon 1" with a 10-20mm f1.0.
Now that would create an equivalence discussion of so epic proportions, that even medium format users would have to intervene!
7 minutes, you're getting old. :)
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review