jenbenn: "The XF56mm F1.2 R is less than half the size of an equivalent lens on a full-frame camera" That is debatable --an equivalent FF lens would be an 85mm 1.8. At least with respect to field of view and dof. The Canon version of such lens happens to be very comparable in size and weight to the Fuji - certainly not double that of the Fuji.iF one conisders the 50mm 1.2 L USM as an "equivalent" lens the statement might be true, however a 50mm on FF has a diffeent application than a 56mm on Aps.-CC and is not comparable. Anyway, apart from the stupid marketing taklk, a real nice lens. Hope Sony release a Zeiss 85mm for their A7r soon, though
@BarnET -- the price differences are there, but those two DSLRs actually AF consistently and with some speed, as opposed to the XE1.
I think the Canon 70D operationally is a sweet camera. But the sensor lags. I don't know much about the K3, so I didn't vote for that, and voted for the Df instead. Maybe I should look more closely at the K3!
But how are skin tones?
WT21: I love lensrentals an roger's blog, but he got bokeh wrong. Bokeh is
"the quantitative measure of depth of field. Objectively, more bokeh is better than less. Lens makers have at last understood what photography experts on internet boards have been telling them, with lenses whose bokeh now goes up to 11. Any lens that cannot go to 11 bokeh is an inferior lens.
Bokeh is impacted by sensor size. m43 sensors, for instance, only have 1/2 the bokeh of full frame sensors."
@Daniel -- was the sarcasm missed?
Bravo again to Fuji in their CONTINUED development of already-released models.
Love it! Love "vignette" especially, lol.
I love lensrentals an roger's blog, but he got bokeh wrong. Bokeh is
WT21: The problem with roundups is that at any given moment, some camera is new, and some is old. The XPro 1 is getting long in the tooth. The 70D and EM1 are the lastest and greatest from their respected makers, as some examples. Not that there's any choice, of course. You have to roll with what you got. But I would argue the XE2 would be a better choice here than the XP1. I'm not a Fuji user, but I think the XE2 is competitive with the rest of this lot. The XP1 is kind of it's own thing.
RButler -- "This is a point in time - winter 2013 and, at this point, the cameras that are new are the cameras that are new."
is so different from what I said"Not that there's any choice, of course. You have to roll with what you got."
The problem with roundups is that at any given moment, some camera is new, and some is old. The XPro 1 is getting long in the tooth. The 70D and EM1 are the lastest and greatest from their respected makers, as some examples. Not that there's any choice, of course. You have to roll with what you got. But I would argue the XE2 would be a better choice here than the XP1. I'm not a Fuji user, but I think the XE2 is competitive with the rest of this lot. The XP1 is kind of it's own thing.
Jogger: Not sure i would agree with the EM1.. for $300 more you can get a Sony A7 with same build quality and 4x the sensor. Lenses that you adapt to it retain their original focal length rather than suffer the 2x crop penalty. Good lenses for the m43 are expensive and have slow apertures compared to FF. And EM1 video quality is atrocious and lacks common formats (where is 1080p60, AVCHD), something not factored into in the analysis.
It's only a penalty if you are trying to go wide. I rather have enjoyed 50mm on m43. It's a nice FL on 2X crop for a lot of uses. Also, the 100-300 is the smallest super-duper zoom you'll find for that FOV. Crop is a feature that is good or bad relative to your needs. Not some universal absolute.
Casio needs to get OUT of the game for their own good. There are frankly too many cameras chasing dwindling consumers. Good for us, but if I cared about Casio, I'd have to ask them what in the world they are doing.
Can I just comment that neither look very good?
PerL: After checking on camera size com one can see that the Df is not much bigger than a Panasonic m43 G3H (15 mm thinner actually) , close to the same size as APS-C Pentax K3 and a little bit lighter (and 11 mm thinner). Just mentioning for those claiming it is large and bulky.
The "thinness" has to do with the grip only. At camerasize, the main portion of the body is clearly thicker. The Df is appreciably taller. The DF is 710g, the GH3 550g. The GH3 is the largest m43. The DF is the smallest Nikon FF DSLR. I think a better comparison is the DF to the D610. They are pretty much the same size, though the D610 is about 40g heavier. Or, compare the DF to the Sony FF mirrorless. The DF is a big camera. That's OK, but it's silly to say it's small. It's only small compared to the largest DSLRs.
Nice looking camera, but the typical un-vibrant colors I have seen from several years of using m43.
graybalanced: I think of all those who fought in the forum flame wars about whether optical viewfinders are better than electronic viewfinders.
Robert Capa photographed a real war, and he didn't even need his viewfinder to become a more famous photographer than you.
Could there be a shallower comment?
It's a very sweet looking camera. Pretty nice controls for that size, too. And the best part? It'll be selling for less than $300 within a year, if past Panasonic camera body prices are any indication.
brownie314: This will probably be a great lens. Although Nikon and Canon users already have options in this range and aperture. But I don't think f/4 lenses get the proper attention they deserve. Many photographers poopoo on them because they are not "fast enough". But these f/4 lenses can be made smaller and tougher than the larger f/2.8 companions. And with the ever increasing iso performance of bodies, f/4 is good enough many times. I personally wish Sigma or Tamron (or Tokina) would make a 50-150 f/4 lens for aps-c that is tough and weather sealed. I don't know of any options for a lens like this from anyone (well I don't know much about Pentax, maybe they do). But it could be made much smaller than the big 70-200 f/2.8 lenses most people mount on there aps-c dslrs, just because they don't have an option. And yes I know that there are 70-200 f/4 lenses, but 50mm is a much better place to start for aps-c than 70mm.
Tokina makes (or made) a 50-135/2.8. It is a tank in terms of build. http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/277-tokina-af-50-135mm-f28-at-x-pro-dx-test-report--review
Wake me up when they finally put a 43 sensor in a fixed lens compact.
The smallest I'll go is 1" sensor. The RX100 killed everything underneath that size for me.
gusda9: These people are not original gypsies like I am they are Irish people living in a camp Real gypsys spread from India a thousand years ago They don't even speak the Romani language All of you are very ignorant of the culture of Gypsys We speak a very Distinctive language that is understandable Throughout the world by Other Gypsies Its like seeing any Asian person and saying they are Chinese Really people you need to google stuff up
There are still real gypsies, so there cannot be "new" gypsies. These are hipster young people with empty lives. Kids of lawyers and business people, looking for meaning in their life. They are romantics at best. The world has seen their lot before. Nothing new here.