Lives in United States United States
Joined on Apr 22, 2008


Total: 178, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »

Ooh, ooh! LR now supports the Lunar! Yeah!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 02:49 UTC as 25th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon issues service advisory on D600's dust issue article (240 comments in total)

I don't understand all the negativity. Nikon has put out a tech advisory, and seems willing to repair. I think that's a good thing. Much like the mirror fix on the Canon 5D classic.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 23, 2013 at 22:24 UTC as 40th comment | 2 replies
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review article (530 comments in total)
In reply to:

aarif: I agree with the conclusions mostly but I don't see this as a con. At all

"Slightly lower resolution than all of its full frame peers"

I do just fine with my 5Dc at 12MP. I could use maybe up to 16. But over that, I don't need it at all, and it just slows down my workflow, which is mainly done on a 3 year old macbook pro.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 03:21 UTC
In reply to:

sjredo: Updated SEL 50. It ain't noticeably faster... :( Couldn't even tell the difference at first.

Which body?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2013 at 02:41 UTC
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: How long has the NEX-6 been on sale now? And all we get from dpREVIEW is an 'updated PREVIEW'.


Barney, I think put more politely -- in the past, DPR had been quite quick with cutting-edge reviews. Now, for cameras that seem important to your readership, there seems a long lag. I'm guessing your editorial staff is a fraction of what it used to be, likely driven by corporate cost reduction. I've no doubt the staff is doing their best, but the the perceived speed to market with the reviews seems worse than before the Amazon acquisition. That's the perception, at least.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2013 at 13:55 UTC
On CP+ 2013: Interview with Canon's Masaya Maeda article (489 comments in total)

Yes Canon. Please expand your offering and price points (and body sizes) in full frame.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2013 at 17:33 UTC as 78th comment

Without a clear workflow or output quality winner, I'll go with the application and company that I think will still be around and independent 10 years from now, and who is most likely to give my library and adjustments an upgrade path - Adobe.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2013 at 13:26 UTC as 102nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Jefftan: biggest problem is no OSS
no use at high ISO at night

marike6: that's also why they make m43. More DOF, IBIS and no tripod needed.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2013 at 13:06 UTC
On Fujifilm X20 Preview preview (201 comments in total)

X20 is intriguing, but I think I'll wait for a Sony RX200, but it is intriguing. I'll be looking at the samples for sure.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2013 at 14:48 UTC as 50th comment | 3 replies
On Canon Powershot N first impressions article (112 comments in total)

I like it, but it would need to be cheap.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 18:45 UTC as 49th comment
On New image viewing options for forums article (162 comments in total)

Very nicely done. Bravo!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2013 at 15:05 UTC as 56th comment

Samsung camera ... YAWN

3D ... Double YAWN

Direct link | Posted on Jan 4, 2013 at 13:08 UTC as 37th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Mssimo: Panasonic has had a 3D lens for a while now, and no one ever talks about it. Shows the demand for such lens.

I agree with the above two, that it's a v. different lens, but I also think the interest in 3D is clearly quite low.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2013 at 18:53 UTC
On Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? article (1511 comments in total)

I used quite a number of them. For me, it's a toss up between the OMD and the RX100 for really different reasons. I'd consider the D600, except the oil issues dampen that for me. The OMD, bar none, had the most surprising set of features, sensor quality bump, and all around speed. It's lacking a little in the QC side, though, but I still voted that #1.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 18:42 UTC as 334th comment

Anyone run a similar test on other FF DSLRs, just to compare?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2012 at 22:42 UTC as 146th comment
In reply to:

SunnyFlorida: The Nikkor 35mm F/1.8 sells for $180, the 35mm F/2.0d sells for $270 and can be used in 2 formats, Oly is asking $500 for this???

That game is still being played?

When was the 35/2 released? I would also suggest you check resolution capabilities of the Canon 35/2 vs. this lens. The Oly is likely to compare quite well, even vs. FF (could even beat that old 35, at least wide open). Also, how about silent AF? No more angry bees. I am not as familiar with the Nikon, but I'll bet the Oly's focus ring doesn't turn while focusing :)

And though those two 35mm lenses are small, the D600 is the smallest body that AOV will work on (at least in digital terms). http://camerasize.com/compare/#378,382

Direct link | Posted on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:09 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS M preview samples gallery article (130 comments in total)

I am thinking this is a very poor set of low-light test shots, and DPR is at fault here.

I have complete ZERO interest in this camera, but look at those low light shots. Almost all have negative EV dialed in. The guitarist shot has -2.33!!! What camera is going to do well in low light with a -2.33 EV? Also, these could be dialed in for high NR.

Again, I have no interest in this camera, but it seems to me the low light sample shots are like HUH???

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 13:37 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

WT21: Too friggen expensive. Period. Canon - why do you think you're losing money?

joejack951: The 24-70 is too expensive compared to the Nikon new kit.

But actually, I should have noted I was talking about the 35. I personally have no interest in "kit" type lenses. I should have been more detailed in my comment.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 15:01 UTC
In reply to:

The A-Team: I don't think this makes any sense as a kit with the 6D. That's a "budget full-frame" so it makes sense to pair it with a "budget" kit lens. Something like an improved 24-85 IS (non-L) would make more sense, or even just the 28-135mm IS. But still nice to see Canon keep releasing new lenses. But where is that new 50mm 1.4 that everyone is asking for? Put IS in it and you'll have a VERY popular lens.

Easy prediction because it would all be true, accurate and fair

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 11:31 UTC

Too friggen expensive. Period. Canon - why do you think you're losing money?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 11:30 UTC as 37th comment | 4 replies
Total: 178, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »