ssh33

ssh33

Lives in United States Long Island, United States
Joined on Oct 27, 2011

Comments

Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ssh33: The distribution method needs some research.

That too, I was referring to win8 app.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 12, 2014 at 11:29 UTC
In reply to:

Johannes Zander: When I click on the video here from Germany it says:
Dieses Video ist privat

What the Duck!?!

Follow the link on the bottom http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/hyperlapse/

Direct link | Posted on Aug 12, 2014 at 10:30 UTC

The distribution method needs some research.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 12, 2014 at 10:14 UTC as 36th comment | 2 replies

Yeah... No. Portraits with shallow depth of field look different. You know, eyes are in focus and the rest of the face is slightly blurred giving the skin smoother appearance and what some refer to as "3D look". This is not it. On the photos shown here the effect looks fake.

That said, I like candid portraits and see no value in a posed shot (no story) - studio people might appreciate it more than I do.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2014 at 15:08 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

I refuse to use anything "cloud" out of principle. The files I pay for or create are going to live on my hard drives or my colocated servers.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2014 at 20:56 UTC as 41st comment | 4 replies
On LensRentals tests Lomography's Petzval lens article (28 comments in total)
In reply to:

G Sciorio: It's a beautiful lens. Shame they don't make one with a native M43 mount. I ended up buying the parts and built my own which cost me about $150 and a few days of time. Mine is not as pretty, nor does it have aperture control but the bokeh rocks like nothing else.

Do share you project G Sciorio! In regards to a M43 version: search ebay for "25mm f1.4 m43" and treat yourself to a $20 wonder with field curvature gone wild, non-round diaphragm opening and some vignetting. I use it wide open for video indoors. Tons of fun without the price tag of the above.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2014 at 18:49 UTC

I hope "simple" lenses paired with these sensors are going to be CHEAP.

Sony has a lot of cool (hot?) , competitively priced bodies that I'd love to get my hands on but the better lenses from Sony are overpriced. Other brands offer more bang for the buck on enthusiast/pro level just yet.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 14:26 UTC as 63rd comment | 2 replies
On Shooting Raw with the Nokia Lumia 1020 post (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: Options are always better than no options. It looks like you can squeeze out a little, maybe even a lot depending on how much you value extra detail and flexibility. That sky in the shot with the building is horrendous in JPEG. If I had the option, I'd always shoot with RAW knowing at the minimum I can squeeze out a JPEG of the same quality.

With that said, imaging on the smartphone is going nowhere until we can figure out how to either increase the size of the sensors or there's a breakthrough in sensor technology.

I saw the future:

Small BSI sensors with very small pixel pitch and the same single lens first. These will have amazing quantum efficiency.

Multi-lens phones - arrays of micro lenses capturing different parts of the image.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 18:58 UTC
On Shooting Raw with the Nokia Lumia 1020 post (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

oselimg: Ok, Nokia raw gives slightly better DR but slightly grainier/noisy look than Nokia jpeg, it's a trade off. But how about technically comparing it to an ordinary DSLR or M4/3? I can't imagine people suddenly shedding their cameras for Nokia phones even as hobbyists. Another gimmick for wannabes.

Apples to oranges. It's a phone. If you want a camera, buy one.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 18:40 UTC
On Shooting Raw with the Nokia Lumia 1020 post (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ivan Lietaert: In my opinion, the jpegs are superior. Why bother with raw in this case? There's little or no improvement at all.

> the jpegs are superior
No.

You like in-phone JPEG processing better than the author's.

The tiny gain in DR is priceless. I love it! Thanks for the review.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 18:37 UTC
In reply to:

MarcLee: Gotta say I have been playing with Aftershot Pro for a while today. It's built on Bibble, but without the kindergarten interface early versions of that had. Fast and a LOT of options.

I was pleasantly shocked to see it also IMPORTS PRE-EXISTING LIGHTROOM ADJUSTMENTS.

What it misses, I can find elsewhere.

I would not even have looked at this without the help of Adobe's CEO. There's a special upgrade price if you have Lightroom pr PSP.

Try Zoner, it costs the same, has a free trial too. I tried it along with Aftershot aka Bibble and favored Zoner. http://zoner.com

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2013 at 15:05 UTC
In reply to:

ssh33: So, what are the Photoshop and Lightroom alternatives on the PC and Mac?

I used Corel when dinosaurs roamed earth - it was a full featured suite and I switched to Adobe just because everyone else seemed to use it at the time. Photoshop was not any better as far as the functionality goes. Is Corel any good now?

Corel AfterShot Pro is only $59, looks like the perfect Lightroom replacement.
http://www.corel.com/corel/product/index.jsp?pid=prod4670071

I like GIMP, use it on Linux.
http://www.gimp.org/

What are the others?

Just tried Zoner - now we're talking! The best so far!

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 17:26 UTC
In reply to:

Kinematic Digit: I wonder how many people would complain if you could use a new Nikon D800E, Nikon D4, Canon 1Dx or a Canon 5Dmk3 for $19 a month and then after a year decided to return it?

...but neither worked in the field if it happened to be the monthly internet authentication time, and the pictures you took with it could not be opened after the rental.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 15:50 UTC
In reply to:

ssh33: So, what are the Photoshop and Lightroom alternatives on the PC and Mac?

I used Corel when dinosaurs roamed earth - it was a full featured suite and I switched to Adobe just because everyone else seemed to use it at the time. Photoshop was not any better as far as the functionality goes. Is Corel any good now?

Corel AfterShot Pro is only $59, looks like the perfect Lightroom replacement.
http://www.corel.com/corel/product/index.jsp?pid=prod4670071

I like GIMP, use it on Linux.
http://www.gimp.org/

What are the others?

Downloading the trials now...

Tried Corel AfterShot Pro (Bibble) - very nice! It only imports photos from an existing folder not giving the option to copy and catalog into a filesystem automatically. I might be missing something - I only had 10 minutes to play with it yet. Other than that it is awesome.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 15:13 UTC

So, what are the Photoshop and Lightroom alternatives on the PC and Mac?

I used Corel when dinosaurs roamed earth - it was a full featured suite and I switched to Adobe just because everyone else seemed to use it at the time. Photoshop was not any better as far as the functionality goes. Is Corel any good now?

Corel AfterShot Pro is only $59, looks like the perfect Lightroom replacement.
http://www.corel.com/corel/product/index.jsp?pid=prod4670071

I like GIMP, use it on Linux.
http://www.gimp.org/

What are the others?

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 13:59 UTC as 469th comment | 10 replies
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1853 comments in total)

Capitalism? I love capitalism! Capitalism is the the right to private property, the right to own. Adobe wants to take that right away from me. I can't own the tools I use, I can't even open my content that I spent countless hours on if I stop paying Adobe. In essence I don't own the fruits of my labor. Really?

What I CAN do is embrace the competition.

Here is a CONSTRUCTIVE suggestion: after a year of payments I own what I paid for - if I stop paying, you stop the updates. Fair?

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 13:55 UTC as 442nd comment | 4 replies
On Panasonic DMC G6 preview (199 comments in total)

GH2 with better EVF/screen, 60fps and focus peaking? Great deal!

There are better "photo" cameras for the money but this is a very nice piece of equipment for video at a very competitive price.

To all those knocking the form factor - pick any other camera that matches your fancypants. I love the utilitarian ergonomics so do many others.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 19:20 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

tedandtricia: Said SD cards couldn't keep up with RAW capture, even though the tech specs say there is RAW. Still 10-bit 4:2:2 ProRes on a $995 cam. Nice.

1.5:1 compressed Cinema DNG to SD card.
Mentioned here: http://vimeo.com/63675961

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2013 at 23:19 UTC
In reply to:

ssh33: This is a pro camera announced at National Association of Broadcasters show. The combination of small size, "Pocket" name, NEX appearance, affordable price, MFT mount and the news post on Digital Photography site is VERY MISLEADING to photographers that want to shoot better video.

BlackMagic will face the perfect storm of returns once they start shipping.

You are right, some will. Probably more videographers than journalists, but yeah. Great tech at affordable price.

Just mark my words about the returns, there is no way of knowing it now. I hope I'm wrong.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2013 at 23:16 UTC
In reply to:

Nukunukoo: Question will it use the MFT Lenses' OIS?

OIS would drain the battery. As it is the battery is rated at 1 hour (probably more like 45 minutes).

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2013 at 22:57 UTC
Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »