Iskender

Iskender

Lives in Finland Åbo, Finland
Works as a Student
Joined on Jul 9, 2007
About me:

Photographer.

Comments

Total: 95, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z news story (528 comments in total)
In reply to:

shaocaholica: Why is the body so long? Flange back is ~7cm. Seems like they could have made it ~2cm shorter.

It's a good question, especially after you see where the sensor plane is.

The white circle with a line through it shows the sensor plane on cameras. In this case, it's only a bit behind the hotshoe, meaning there's a lot more than 2 cm to save. It can be done, and has been done with the Leica S2.

I think the answer can be had by comparing the prices of this and an S2 camera. This design provides a better tripod surface, too.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 16:41 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (454 comments in total)
In reply to:

JONNO G: I swear pentax could come out with a full frame with 3 card slots at 75 mp with being fully waterproof and dpreview would mark it under 85%

Something you can be even more sure of: whatever way they review Pentax cameras, the Pentax fans will do a lot of whining.

It used to be that the Olympus fans were the worst whiners, but my, how things have changed.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 09:37 UTC
On Chinese government orders Nikon to stop selling D600 news story (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valiant Thor: Coming from a country that puts melamine in dog food and baby formula and toxic acidic chemicals in flip-flops that burn the skin off your feet, that's the pot calling the kettle black.

Valiant Thor: Do you actually know they're not inspecting across the board, or are you just basing your view of 1/6 of humanity on a few well-publicised incidents?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 19:36 UTC
On Chinese government orders Nikon to stop selling D600 news story (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valiant Thor: Coming from a country that puts melamine in dog food and baby formula and toxic acidic chemicals in flip-flops that burn the skin off your feet, that's the pot calling the kettle black.

None of that will be made better by selling a bad camera - two wrongs still don't make a right.

Also, "a country" is a pretty broad term here. It's not like the government mandates melamine in food. Sure, they could probably use some better inspection of manufacturers. Which is exactly what they're doing with this camera.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 21:52 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 First Impressions Review preview (622 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gesture: I admire the silly names each OEM gives its image processor.

Pentax' "Safox" AF module is also pretty good - it's the most sapphic AF system in the industry!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2014 at 06:19 UTC
In reply to:

Retzius: Nice work Olympus.

Maybe one of these years Nikon can find the time to come out with a wide angle DX lens. Just one, cuz you know, it is your biggest installed user base. I know you are busy and I know you don't care what the other companies are doing and I know it is hubris for me to bother you with such things. But look, it has been like 10 years. If you designed one lens element a year for the last 10 years you could have had designed one by now.

Naveed Akhtar: bluevellet is right: I'm talking about the old Four Thirds system. I and many others jumped from that to M43, so common deficiencies in both systems add up to a lot of years...

If this lens is as good as the early reviews suggest, the wait is over though! Very good. In a perfect world there would be a tilt/shift in the system too, but I'll manage.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

slncezgsi: Glad to see more Zeiss for mirror less cameras, but I personally think that longer focal length like 80mm (or even more) would have been more useful for a macro lens.

yabokkie: Do you know a lot about practical use?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 19:02 UTC
In reply to:

Lux Painter: The 25mmf1.8 sounds like an awesome lens and was long overdue. And based on Olympus reputation of building great lenses it should have a stellar performance.

But the price tag of $400 (twice the price of a full frame 50mmf1.8 lens) must be a sick joke!

Maybe Olympus is trying to ruin their m43 biz completely.

If the 25 is anything like the 45/1.8, it will be clearly better than the 50/1.8. The Lenstip reviews of the 45 and 50 show quite clearly which one is made to a lower price - the 45 does not have "loud and unreliable autofocus".

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 02:18 UTC
In reply to:

Retzius: Nice work Olympus.

Maybe one of these years Nikon can find the time to come out with a wide angle DX lens. Just one, cuz you know, it is your biggest installed user base. I know you are busy and I know you don't care what the other companies are doing and I know it is hubris for me to bother you with such things. But look, it has been like 10 years. If you designed one lens element a year for the last 10 years you could have had designed one by now.

Some have actually waited for a fast 50mm equivalent from Olympus for ten years (since the launch of the previous system). So maybe your wish will be granted, too?

This Olympus has nine elements, though, so it apparently takes more than a year per element. : )

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 22:47 UTC
In reply to:

disraeli demon: Excellent! I've been hoping Olympus would come up with a 25mm 1.8… the PanaLeica 1.4 is brilliant but price aside, I tried one in a shop and it weighs a TON… hopefully the street price of the Olympus will be a little more reasonable

You know M43 has succeeded at being a light system when a 200-gram lens is considered very heavy. : )

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 10:23 UTC
In reply to:

BaldCol: I've never used a camera with anything other than the standard Bayer layout. Do any of the alternatives from Fiji or the Foveaon from Sigma make a lot of difference in the real world?

Having seen the output of a friend's X100S, I'd take that sensor over anything of the same size or smaller any day. And this is after looking at out-of-camera JPEGs!

The output feels a lot like it's one sensor size larger than it actually is. The same goes for Foveon, with reservations (cons in Roland Karlsson's post above).

I'm generally not that interested in 35mm sensors, but it would be interesting seeing one in that format from Fuji or Sigma - it would probably show things previously seen only in medium format.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 11:58 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1595 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZhanMInG12: Actually, the smallest ILC before the A7 is the Leica M9 (which is a shade thinner than the M type 240).

Abaregi: it's still an interchangeable lens camera, which is exactly what the sentence in the review is talking about. The words have clear meanings.

Besides, it's not exactly like the Sony is in the same class as the SLRs...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 22:16 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1595 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZhanMInG12: Actually, the smallest ILC before the A7 is the Leica M9 (which is a shade thinner than the M type 240).

Indeed! It's almost mirrorless, but there has to be at least one mirror in the rangefinder. :)

But aside from that nitpick: nice review!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 22:12 UTC
On Using third-party lenses on Sony Cyber-shot a7 / a7R article (470 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: This is the type of review that I would expect DigitalRev to put out.. the purposely, out of left field, hipster, trying too hard to be different approach to a non-review.. in order to mask lack of competence and indifference to the camera under review.

This is the type of comment I would expect Jogger to put out: the on-purpose rude, hipster and trying-too-hard-to-be-critical approach to a non-comment. All of this to mask the lack of genuine insight and indifference to the camera under review.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 14:51 UTC
In reply to:

fakuryu: Funny, when I look at my OVF (or even the LCD screen when I use my m43) I can see the shot I'm about to take, not light gathering equivalency on the sensor and such. Am I doing something wrong?

>Am I doing something wrong?

Yeah, you're taking photos, what's up with that? I wouldn't show up in DPR forums after admitting that if I were you...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 04:10 UTC
In reply to:

Zeisschen: wait: "It's an ultra-fast portrait prime"

Why is there still no single portrait shot from this lens? I can mostly see pictures from houses at daylight with focus close to infinity and aperture stopped down. Any of them could be made with a kit-zoom lens. Pictures that could need some subject isolation (horse, buddha statue) are not even taken at F1.2. The horse statue shot has infinite DOF, it could be taken with any point and shoot or smartphone. The only F1.2 "portrait shot" I see is the guitar player statue , but impossible to see any details on that surface, I can't even spot the focus point.
To me all those samples look like a kid running around taking snaps with the camera on automatic-mode. This is a f**** expensive 1600$ ultra-fast portrait lens, remember? I guess I better look elsewhere...

Zeisschen:
Get over your huge sense of entitlement. You got more than you paid for already - since you paid nothing. Yet you're complaining.

Swearing over supposed faults in a gallery published for free makes you look totally spoiled. Also, there are plenty of portraits - you're just saying there are none because you're apparently using your own, very narrow definition of the word.

Consider this: someone shared a gallery of photos, and in return it looks like you didn't even try to appreciate it - you're actually telling people they should not like the gallery. Had the photographer had the same attitude, he would probably have said "Screw those posters, I've worked for days non-stop. Now I rest".

But instead we got many sample pictures, and that was a problem for you.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2014 at 22:05 UTC
In reply to:

BorisAkunin: First review I could find:
http://www.lenstip.com/394.1-Lens_review-Panasonic_Leica_DG_Nocticron_42.5_mm_f_1.2_Asph._P.O.I.S._Introduction.html

Apart from heavy vignetting (-2.23 EV at f/1.2), it seems to perform very well.

yabokkie:
Lenstip liked it a lot, so I guess it has to be "strange". Since well, it's apparently very important to you that this lens is something else than good. It's very expensive, yes, but aside from that I don't see why its high quality is so hard to swallow.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2014 at 21:44 UTC
In reply to:

BorisAkunin: First review I could find:
http://www.lenstip.com/394.1-Lens_review-Panasonic_Leica_DG_Nocticron_42.5_mm_f_1.2_Asph._P.O.I.S._Introduction.html

Apart from heavy vignetting (-2.23 EV at f/1.2), it seems to perform very well.

It appears to have awesome correction of coma.

It's a fast, expensive lens with great coma correction which brings all the whiners out of the woodwork. Sounds a lot like a certain Nikon lens, doesn't it? =]

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2014 at 14:57 UTC
On CES 2014: Fujifilm Stand Report news story (13 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: nr 7 is a bit pornographic. (or is that just me?)

How are you gentlemen !!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2014 at 20:23 UTC
On CES 2014: Fujifilm Stand Report news story (13 comments in total)
In reply to:

Asylum Photo: Chris Dodkin in the Fujifilm Forums has a much more comprehensive booth review. Kind of disappointing, DPReview. :/

How good are Dodkin's reports from the other brand booths?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 9, 2014 at 20:22 UTC
Total: 95, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »