Tilted Plane

Joined on Mar 17, 2012

Comments

Total: 43, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

There is some question about whether the adapter works with Canon brand lenses, or simply Sigma lenses in the Canon mount. Any thoughts? It seems this is a far bigger question? The idea of buying a Sigma lens in a Canon mount to use on a Sony camera starts to get convoluted! Though not totally wacky.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2016 at 13:07 UTC as 38th comment | 2 replies

Doesn't this strike people as too expensive? Whew!

Oh, and the "Oh Wow" is really out of line. Fun, but inappropriate for an impartial review site. Let's see if you have the courage to edit that.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 17:40 UTC as 290th comment | 2 replies
On article Sony Alpha 7R II: Real-world ISO invariance study (369 comments in total)

I think the labels here are misleading for people not reading, carefully, the article. Just saying "ISO 100" is not what it seems here, right? (I'm addressing the dpreview folks here.) Worth fixing with true clarity because the point is terrific and well done!!! Thanks

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2015 at 16:11 UTC as 101st comment
In reply to:

ThePhilips: I can't understand why there are so few 4.0/100mm macro lenses.

2.8 is useless for the macro, and it only hikes up the price and size of the lenses.

Even if you shoot at f/4 or f/8, focusing and viewing can be easier/better with the f/2.8 option...in my brief experience with the Olympus f/2.0 90mm macro at least.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2015 at 11:11 UTC
On article Canon EF 50mm F1.8 STM real-world samples gallery (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tilted Plane: I admire dpreview overall, but doesn't this seem small potatoes compared to the really interesting new lenses out there (some fast wide zooms, some terrific fast primes, etc.)? I mean, you complain that you don't have the resources to get reviews done faster, but now you have time to check out a f/1.8 50mm? Hmmm. Am I alone on this?

OK...I get it. I wasn't being a snob (I hope) but missed the point that the new lens might seem special or better than other 50mm primes out there. Let's hope they review the heck out of it and compare to the Sigma and Zeiss competition. And Nikon's, for kicks. I bow out. Thanks everyone.

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2015 at 18:31 UTC
On article Canon EF 50mm F1.8 STM real-world samples gallery (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tilted Plane: I admire dpreview overall, but doesn't this seem small potatoes compared to the really interesting new lenses out there (some fast wide zooms, some terrific fast primes, etc.)? I mean, you complain that you don't have the resources to get reviews done faster, but now you have time to check out a f/1.8 50mm? Hmmm. Am I alone on this?

But...it doesn't really need a review, does it? A great lens, and cheap, sure...

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2015 at 14:24 UTC
On article Canon EF 50mm F1.8 STM real-world samples gallery (141 comments in total)

I admire dpreview overall, but doesn't this seem small potatoes compared to the really interesting new lenses out there (some fast wide zooms, some terrific fast primes, etc.)? I mean, you complain that you don't have the resources to get reviews done faster, but now you have time to check out a f/1.8 50mm? Hmmm. Am I alone on this?

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2015 at 13:40 UTC as 27th comment | 13 replies
On article Accessory Review: Western Digital My Passport Wireless (84 comments in total)

I like the review...and wish there was more (lots more) of this hard core real world stuff on dpreview. Not to mention faster camera reviews.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 00:33 UTC as 11th comment
On article Sony FE 28mm F2 samples gallery posted (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tilted Plane: I own this. Huge (!) distortion, corrected well in jpgs. Focuses fast and quiet. Not especially small for an f/2, but light. No image stabilization. In all, very sharp and therefore competent but nothing to write home about for this price. I'm keeping it, but not with particular joy.

Just to clarify on the sharpness--I've not measured it, but my 24mm Zuiko feels sharper on the A7r, and even the 14-24mm Nikon has more apparent snap (sharpness/contrast). It's not Zeiss quality, for sure. But then, this is a $400 lens, and I use it when I don't want to think and it makes a very decent point & shoot street lens.

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2015 at 12:28 UTC
On article Sony FE 28mm F2 samples gallery posted (100 comments in total)

I own this. Huge (!) distortion, corrected well in jpgs. Focuses fast and quiet. Not especially small for an f/2, but light. No image stabilization. In all, very sharp and therefore competent but nothing to write home about for this price. I'm keeping it, but not with particular joy.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2015 at 14:31 UTC as 26th comment | 7 replies
On article X-Transformed? Fujifilm X30 Review (342 comments in total)

Weird, but it seems ugly to me! But the point is good--some of us want our cameras to look great, too. Yes! Maybe you need a poll/contest for "The camera that takes the best picture"--meaning of course, from the outside.

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2015 at 12:59 UTC as 79th comment | 3 replies

These are not actually photographs, but photographic contact prints of engravings. (Some might call them photograms.) And they are direct positives on metal, so there is no negative. The dates are approx 1826. The only known existing photograph (in a camera, 8 hour exposure) by Niepce is in Texas, also made in 1826.

Maybe this has been mentioned already in the other notes, but my two cents anyway.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 15:36 UTC as 4th comment

right on...and ditto for Nikon.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 15:47 UTC as 247th comment

The question does linger--is a $900 camera, without a lens, entry level? The Rebel line seems to beg for a true entry level--in terms of price--without having to buy a 2 or 3 year old model. No?

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 20:24 UTC as 200th comment | 8 replies
On article Nikon D750 Review (1979 comments in total)

The page of the flare issue is unusually fair and intelligent. Kudos! And thanks!

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2015 at 15:15 UTC as 167th comment
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review (1317 comments in total)

A pretty careful avoidance of Nikon (or Sony) comparisons, overall. Too bad. Head-to-head comparisons are really (!) helpful. Does this hold up next to a D750? Or even the D610? Or the similarly priced A7II? If so, when, where, under what shooting conditions?

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 21:12 UTC as 298th comment | 10 replies
In reply to:

rrr_hhh: I don't get it at all : may be because I'm not a native English speaker ?
But really, I would be hard pressed to translate any of these sentence into my own language.

I mean : one can launch a teaser without telling anything about the subject/object coming, but why on earth making such un-understandable statements : which image of Canon do you think they to are offering to their customers ? What I get from it us just that Canon isn't able to communicate, not even at the symbolic level in order to create a positive image of the brand.

Plus, given the avalanche of negative comments targeting those who don't think Canon is able to see the impossible, well, I just feel aggressed/insulted.

Talk about a communication fiasco...

the other replies are right on...and now we know it was a dud! ha.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 18:10 UTC
In reply to:

Macx: English isn't my first language so please bear with me, but is "We see impossible" proper English?

Regardless, it's still complete marketing bullship, akin to "We're giving it 110%", unless of course they're suggesting that they're delusional at Canon.

You can do whatever you want in English...partly why it's such a suggestive and invasive language. There is a "grammar" that most of us follow, but when we break the rules, it's potentially powerful. Of course, much of the time it sounds strained. Canon's ad agency took a chance and great for that (the camera company hasn't been)...but yeah, it's awkward. Supposed to make you think, right? But think what?

Still, it could have been another boring product ad. Impossible to have seen how awful the reception would be to it. I guess they saw that, since it was impossible.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 17:48 UTC
In reply to:

rrr_hhh: I don't get it at all : may be because I'm not a native English speaker ?
But really, I would be hard pressed to translate any of these sentence into my own language.

I mean : one can launch a teaser without telling anything about the subject/object coming, but why on earth making such un-understandable statements : which image of Canon do you think they to are offering to their customers ? What I get from it us just that Canon isn't able to communicate, not even at the symbolic level in order to create a positive image of the brand.

Plus, given the avalanche of negative comments targeting those who don't think Canon is able to see the impossible, well, I just feel aggressed/insulted.

Talk about a communication fiasco...

It's true--it's a great example of English at its best, filled with ambiguous implications. Just what ads do well--making the reader go somewhere further. I love the ad. It's over the top, but why not? And it doesn't make "sense" in the way a translator or translation might expect at first. Way beyond facts and clear points. A good thing!! Who knows about the physical results, of course. Nikon might sneak something in using a Sony sensor and Canon, well...

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 14:49 UTC

GREAT interview--amazingly candid responses from Sony. Helps to love the brand and have hopes. Thanks all around. In my view Sony will never intrude on Canon and Nikon with DSLR, but mirrorless? The field is wide open. Good for us!

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 13:46 UTC as 42nd comment | 1 reply
Total: 43, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »