Yeah there are some issues I would like to see answered. However, this camera and the almost released Batis 25 and 85 WILL be my go to. Now I just need a long range prime and all is good.
I doubt it is a coincidence that the release date of what appears to be such an awesome camera is similar to the release of what appears to be amazing Batis lenses from Zeiss specifically for Sony mirrorless cameras.
On paper at least, this could be an awesome combination.
Hey when Domino's admitted their pizza sucked and changed directions, sales sored. One of the great PR strategies that few understand. Nikon obviously learned from the Domino's pizza strategy, although, I still can't say I am a "Domino's pizza fan"
Well IF that 300mm performs, goodbye Sony hello Nikon. One of my favorite things to do was hike in Glacier NP and take some wildlife shots. Getting older just made it too hard to bring my prior Canon 400mm DO. However, this is a game changer for old geezers (not that old but old enough) like myself if performance is there.
Paul Kersey Photography: can't wait for the warm weather so I can harass people with this. Seriously though, regulating usage of these devices is a must, or need I start shooting them outa the sky?
Let's try shooting them out of the sky before entrusting our government to "regulate"
If I could afford it, I would buy it in a second. I really miss my MF days and this looks like a winner. I still miss my Mamiya 7.
I owned the original 400 DO and it was my favorite lens of all time. I got some amazing shots of wildlife in Glacier on long hikes that were only possible with a lens of this length and WEIGHT. The DO has gotten mixed reviews but I loved mine and I look forward to how this thing tests out.
HMM, it may just "force" me back to Canon.
These are JUST the types of "upgrades" or "new releases" that cause consumers to leave a brand.
I love gadgets, what can I say. I rarely spend much time reading about most "new" cameras and browse more than read BUT this thing caught my eye.
Most "new" cameras are pretty much variations of an old theme with different sizes, sensors, etc but this is really NEW
I have no clue how it will ultimately pan out in real world settings and it seems somewhat heavy but I like it.
Too much negativity about this. Maybe it is just a "Polaroid" as someone has suggested but in a way even though the Polaroid ultimately failed it also had a huge impact on the paradigm shift in the advancement of photography.
Priaptor: As much as I hate to admit it, whether you like or don't like this camera or some of the other new Sony releases, they have the balls to innovate and bring new and unique products to market.
They might not appeal to all, they may cost more than some are willing to spend BUT they are not short with their innovations and have made REALLY serious inroads into the photo world.
It was an expression. I don't hate to admit it. What I hate to admit is that Canon and Nikon, to a large extent have lost their innovative edge.
I am now, myself shooting with an A7R.
As much as I hate to admit it, whether you like or don't like this camera or some of the other new Sony releases, they have the balls to innovate and bring new and unique products to market.
How much more "good will" would Nikon have achieved IF they just admitted to the problem when it was first discovered. This stuff never ceases to amaze me.
I have to say, I have always loved Leica, but recently had to give up. When companies like Sony are releasing competing products with leapfrogging technology with in many ways better build quality, how can Leica continue with the old "repackaging" and selling for a premium OEM products for equivalent prices.
Before I get attacked for quality of construction, my X1 had its leather exterior peel off, my Leica M9 was a painted silver that marred easily and both cameras while I enjoyed and felt had something to offer as there were few competing in this arena at the time, today, I don't see Leica as a legitimate choice either from a quality for technological perspective.
Photato: FF stand for Fullframe Fixation.The high cost of 36x24mm sensor production will relegate this line of cameras to the niche of affluent enthusiasts and given it a competitive disadvantage.APS-H is the way to go. For 1/3 of the price and almost the same quality.You know, FF backward compatibility is no longer that important, specially with mirrorless much shorter flange distance where it makes a lot of sense to go with the much sharper native glass.
"almost the same quality"
And you know this how????
"relegate this line of cameras to the niche of affluent enthusiasts"
Why is that? Depending upon the lens roll out, this may be a very competitive product to those HUGE DSLRs that non-affluent enthusiast pay much more for.
My take is you just don't like Sony, which is fine, but your premise is nothing but misplaced assumptions.
Now that is awesome. Awesome enough to get me back into shooting wildlife in the dark
Congratulations to all who now feel better that DPREVIEW have validated their purchases.
From my perch, the Pulitzer, especially for writing and almost as much for photography has become a political joke, similar to the "Nobel Peace Prize".
Having read every Pulitzer prize winning book for the last 15 years I think Joseph would be turning over in his grave if he saw where this has gone. Same for photography
Deleted pending purge: Trophy hunters do not need more scopes. What they need is more basic education.Whosoever takes life to posess a trophy should have their head examined.Taking photos is just as exciting and no life is destroyed - isn't it time already to put a global stop to killing sports?As to the Nikon ad... Why do we think that any camera manufacturer would stick to high moral values? It's against the credo of mercantilism, and the motto there is "Sell, sell, sell!"...
Interesting perspective. So given your comments I assume taking a life if no trophy is involved is morally acceptable??
Funny millions of human lives are taken every year in the name of " a woman's choice" which from your political slant you probably support.
It's a slippery slope when you make yourself the arbiter of morality as you often find yourself contradicting your own hypocritical views.
Me personally I don't understand the thrill of big game hunting or hunting in general love the environment and am as conservative as they come but don't pass judgement as readily as you seem to. Incidentally are you aware that the daming of our rivers have altered ecosystems and wiped out species more than any other act of man? Should we knock them down to rebalance our sensitive ecosystems in order to restore equilibrium and protect and restore those animals you seem to love and want to protect? I'm game.
This is what the iPhone 5 should have been