Daniel L

Daniel L

Lives in United States Dallas,,USA, TX, United States
Works as a Web Developer
Has a website at http://www.danielslim.com
Joined on Mar 21, 2002

Comments

Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ecube: I wonder if the original negative / electronic file changed hands, thus, ownership is now exclusive to the buyer.

who cares

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 22:21 UTC

There's nothing special about pay to get in, pay to get more "ray of light" and pay more to do more, again and again photo.... especially on a scene that never changed - That's Antelope Canyon for people that never been there before. Everyone has to pay to get the picture, you just have to go at the right time of the year.

Nothing more than joining a photograph-tour shooting on a rare captive snow leopard in a zoo.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 22:09 UTC as 149th comment | 3 replies

So sad people paying this much for a photo that anyone with decent photography knowledge can produce for as long as they willing to pay entrance fee and guide to Antelope Canyon... and you can tell and tip the guide more by telling him, hey, can you throw more sand, "i need more smoke!"
I seen Antelope Canyon images 10 times better than and don't care much for it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 20:38 UTC as 174th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

@joseph
So we are down to the point how many support your hypocrisy?

You fall short, still.

Do an arithmetic see how users react to the comments. It’s a simple math. Quite a pathetic effort you feel compelled bringing in the cavalry keeping up with your pretense. Is this part of your buddies club here - the internet anonymous nobodies with cookies life span?

Your reactions to anyone in disagreement with you speak for your character - cynical, pompous and delusional. Quit preaching and respect others - i’m sure they will find my original comment more irritating than you.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2014 at 00:48 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

My goodness. Compliment a lady “cute” according to your view is an uncivilized ape, sexist predator with intent to harm, abuse and sexually exploit. Hey @Joseph, have you told your beautiful companion that there’s rule in your big man house that she shall not describe other men but you as handsome, attractive or good looking.

Are you some kind of religious fanatic how men and women should behave by the book?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 03:06 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

@joseph
I don’t have a wife or daughter but if i do i think they would scare to death around people like you full of anger with explicit words than a man flattering them with simple greeting.

Your underwear is too tight man. Loosen it and take a chill pill.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 21:34 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

@tkbslc It's a technology site afterall, majority of the posters are male. You can see similar behavior on female orientated site comments toward male. I work with google analytics, technology site generally has more than 75 percentage male gender in demographic, my perosnal photograph site is 70&. Try social media where female audience rules, and see how they response to "Mad Men" posts on Jon Hamm. I have never heard any replies that compliement his talent on acting. Their comments are beyond just his looks! they practully want to rip him apart and blow him with thier keyboard. Believe it's better reading than some nail polish on review site

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 19:01 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

Say the man replied with profanity and fault assumption. I was born in 70s. I hope you don't beat a man up or call the authority every time you heard a man compliment a lady of her look. @joseph

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 17:51 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

That's true. @tkbslc i can't argue with that. But it's a post about camera review not her work. I don't think it makes any different if it was male. But we don't generally see male poster has their portrait shot embedded in the review, does it? Appearance is everything to a female. I see a beautiful portrait in the opening and compliment i see fit.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 17:34 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: she is cute.

Last time i check, complement a lady cute is not derogatory remark. Chill and go play with toddlers.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 17:24 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (509 comments in total)

she is cute.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 17:13 UTC as 158th comment | 35 replies

I've seen enough, nothing is going to change my mind unless Canon raise the price to 3k... then i may to reconsider 1Dx instead.

Now ship damn thing already.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2014 at 23:28 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1659 comments in total)

Hey. Toddler and crybabies. Biiiitching and whinniiing do you no good.

PM me how much you want to sell your Canon gear.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2014 at 15:03 UTC as 106th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Roman Korcek: I am afraid Canon and Nikon are going the Nokia way.

Nokia?

May be your interests are within cellphones and spec-sheet entry-level camera toys.

Name one camera marker has library collection of optics that can compete with Canon or Nikon? Who is capable of competing with them and send them the Nokia way? Samsung and Sony combine giving up bodies for free won't be able to get the job done. It's always the selection of optics that matter, not the body.

User base with cheap body/kit lens is not profitable unless you can get them buy in high end glass. Now once these newbies learn the needs of better optics to grow their interest, they don't go Nokia way; they go Canon or Nikon way.

Also, Canon is the only player in the game on mid-high end cinema series EOS system. Gimmick toys aren't their area of focus anymore.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2014 at 00:12 UTC

Just a reminder to the toddlers here

With or without WIFI/4K/touchscreen. The price point is $1,799, you can't afford it anyway. Go play with your cellphone and call mommy for monthly allowance while you at it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 03:51 UTC as 68th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

nir-vana: A journalist should ask the tough questions and not just let Canon representative make an online advertisement. The man talks extensively about video but the changes are minor, late and not substantial. No articulated screen, no 4K, low end 4:2:0, no focus peaking, no advanced codec, no WiFi, no touch focus, no word about full sensor readout or line skipping. All of that make it inferior to the latest MILCs of Panasonic, Sony and other mirrorless brands, or even to Panasonic latest compacts.
It seems like Canon still believe that their only rival is Nikon.

Who need all that junks? There's a club call 2nd-grade, i heard Panties, Sorry and Samcrap are in it. They sell gimmicks not DSLR.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 00:58 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

NancyP: Camera 910 grams, 400 f/5.6L, 1,150 grams, extra battery in pocket. 2 kilos is pretty light for a high performance birding combo. Beats having to hand hold 5 kilos of 500 f/4, 1.4x TC, and 1DX.

Here's mine. 500 f4, 1.4x, 1D IV vs 7D Mark II, 500 F4 Bare. So excited about this new BIF venture!!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 18:33 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel L: U give 4k, wifi, touchscreen at $1,800 to all the Crybabies.... Guess what, they will be complaining about no instant social sharing buttons and this five-year long-awaited DSLR is so beyond the curve than their smart phones at $299.

That's the fact.

crybabies... cry.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 18:24 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)

U give 4k, wifi, touchscreen at $1,800 to all the Crybabies.... Guess what, they will be complaining about no instant social sharing buttons and this five-year long-awaited DSLR is so beyond the curve than their smart phones at $299.

That's the fact.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 18:13 UTC as 461st comment | 5 replies
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)

Excellent upgrade - Mini 1Dx cost 3 plus times less. Thank you Canon. This is just what i need to upgrade my Mark IV without spending the big bucks.

I don't need 4K, touch screen, Wifi and ton more features that push the price point way up where i can't afford.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 17:44 UTC as 482nd comment
Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »