CommanderMAD

CommanderMAD

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 23, 2010

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
In reply to:

jonikon: I own the Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD IF non-VC lens in a Nikon mount and bought the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC version to replace it. However, after comparing the sharpness of these two lenses, I decided the non-VC lens was noticeably sharper at f2.8-f4.0. I could not justify the loss in sharpness for the occasional usefulness of VC in a lens of such short focal length, so I returned the VC version and kept the sharper non-VC version. There is little doubt in my mind that this new 24-70 VC Tamron would have been sharper without the VC. I'll bet the reviews of this lens will find the center sharp and the edges soft at f2.8-f4.0. The only good reason to have VC on a lens of this type is for shooting video where it matters, and softness does not.

@T3
jonikon was speaking from experience in the fact that he actually HAD both and compared them to find that the new lens wasn't as good.
You're just spouting theory.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2012 at 17:19 UTC
On Startrails_Estoril in the Startrails (FULL COLORS ONLY) challenge (1 comment in total)

Gorgeous...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2012 at 19:58 UTC as 1st comment
On Aviation Photography article (51 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mark Forman: http://www.ceehere.com/Airplanes/Warbirds/Oshkosh2008HD2Star/5865310_MBXRcR#364226306_uEX2o

I shot this in 2008 for EAA Warbirds magazine.

Aviation Photography is not shot with a basic set of rules except when it comes to safety.
For instance getting a sharp image at high shutter speeds is more important than blurring the prop.
Enjoy my galleries.
Mark Forman
Mark Forman Productions, Corp.
http://www.screeningroom.com
http://www.ceehere.com

Beautiful...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 4, 2012 at 22:39 UTC
On Aviation Photography article (51 comments in total)
In reply to:

kelav: Nice article, thanks for that.
I can see the photograph of L-39 Albatros in the article. This Czech origin aircraft has typical Czech camouflage, but there's something more, a Russian five-pointed star on tail and wings. It's so funny. This aircraft has never been used in the Russian army. It looks like the aircraft has been bought by some rich American... and he's thinking that the Czech Republic is a part of "Russian Empire". It's like I say... USA is a part of Mexico, or even part of Canada :-) The same stupidity like Czech L-39 with Russian stars :-)

Usually the US military will acquire foreign aircraft to train their pilots on how to recognize certain paint schemes, camouflage and national insignia.
At an airshow i even saw an F-18 painted with Russia's blue snow camo and red stars.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 4, 2012 at 22:31 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4