dansclic

dansclic

Joined on Jun 14, 2012

Comments

Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11

Thé panasonic lx100 is way ahead with accuracy, color rendition, this is,so,obvoius and disapointing because I was hesitating between thé Sony and thé lumix, now I am nomore : lx100 is thé best choice !

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 07:10 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm X-T10 First Impressions Review preview (529 comments in total)

Your size comparison is,not fair. To have a precise idea you should have used thé same lenses

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 17:42 UTC as 90th comment
On Lensbaby introduces Velvet 56mm f/1.6 article (166 comments in total)

It is far from David Hamilton. The picture with the young girl is awfull : Colors are bad, bokeh is zero, is this a trick to try to have better pictures for bad photographers ? I wonder. Just use a spécific filter on your 300 dollar 85 mm and you will have much better pictures
Just Lens for geeks not for réal photographers.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 06:34 UTC as 28th comment

Unparalleled : just empty marketing words.....
Do not understand why you say Samyang AND rokinon. thought Samyang was the original corean company and rokinon just a commercial name for Some countries, am I wrong ?
Price is too high, whatever alternative you prefer for following reasons :
Bad build quality, mf only, no VR (not all people are shooting macro), servicing quality not,sure they are efficient in smaller countries, many much better alternatives inclusive original products preventing you turning crazy if a prpblem appears : same company for Lens and body : same responsibility !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2015 at 18:05 UTC as 21st comment
On Sony Alpha a7 II Review preview (825 comments in total)

Yes, battery life is miserable. This is a major problem because this causes you to check every half hour if you are not going to fin d yourself in a bad position : the imposibility to take the shot at a précise moment. This is quite distrubing and his a major prpblem, as the shutter noise is, because it draws attention on you , this is very strange for a camera chose design is intended to make you invisible !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 15:33 UTC as 119th comment | 3 replies
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1418 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): How long before this camera is found to have a common defect?

It is a shame to consider that a new camera would automatically have a defect. And even if it is so, nikon like any other company Will fix it. The small problem woth the 810 has been extremeley quickly fixed, as long as I know

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 16:48 UTC
On Nikon announces AF-S Nikkor 20mm f/1.8G ED article (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

photofan1986: Meh, I have a Panasonic 20 f1.7, it's even faster, and so much smaller and lighter, that they managed to make it a pancake. Come on, Nikon, give us the pancake version :D
Ps: That's humor ;-)

What's the point comparing a 20 mm Panasonic which is actually a 40 mm and a real ultra wide angle lens like the nikon 20 mm !
Some comments strike me dead and mêla me even think some people who comment do not have any idea of what photography is.....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 07:48 UTC
On Just posted: Fujifilm X10 in-depth review article (155 comments in total)

The review forgot a few things : parallax problems when close viewing, complicated menu handling, expansive ......
I agree with software jpegs. i have sold mine after three weeks, Will probably buy Sony rx100....larger sensor and probably better lens....more pocketable.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2012 at 06:34 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

High quality at moderate prices ???? I Am dead !!!! If you want quality you have to pay for, cheap stuff from sigma is not a good deal : 50 per cent is decentered, mecanical problems, un reliable autofocus.....
So again a 1700 USD Lens and what ? Buy a used nikon or canon instead.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2012 at 06:26 UTC as 34th comment | 13 replies
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

SeeRoy: The cons don't include the fact that the vf has no diopter adjustment? DPR thinks this isn't important??? On a camera whose vf is one of it's principal USPs? At this price?

The example I tried, wearing glasses (hint to Fuji), had an in-focus optical and out-of-focus evf on the standard eyepiece. Given that no dealers bother to stock alternatives I can't judge what would happen with a different value inserted. Oh yes, wearing glasses meant I couldn't see the full vf image either.

Hopeless.

I have tested that new camera and as I am wearing glasses, I could not use either the optical viewfinder or the electronic one. The optical is totally unprecise, the electronic one gives you a blurred image you cannot correct.
It is a shame that dpreview did not mention another problem : the image is freezing when the point has been done. This definiteley outperforms the Fuhji xpro 1 as a competitor to Leica which remains the only real telemeter performance camera, which the fuji xpro 1 will never be at this stage. We all know the Fuji is no telemeter camera ok but even if it is a camera that delivers good resolution, everyone has to admit that the problems of af precision (my test camera has been unable to make the point at short distance with a f1,4 lens in a shop with normal light), diopter adjustment, freezing image, aso. By far, I would buy the oly EM5 : maybe less resolution BUT : weather sealed, quick AF, a lot of excellent lenses, easy to use, small and ... much cheaper !

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2012 at 10:49 UTC
In reply to:

3systermuser: well, the 24-120f4VR was a bad lens , it was not as sharp as I expected it to be and it was huge , it was not very well built.
so, I just sold it after using it for a few weeks in 2010.

the 24-70 is a good lens but it is also heavy and bulky , and more importantly it lacks the VR2 , so I still have it but seldom use it now.
I think this AFS24-85VR is a good lens for 580USD and it is so light and small , also this really confimed that the rumored the D600 is for real.
any way, when we need really good lenses for landscape ,studio and as such , we still need a set of Zeiss or expensive f1.4G Nikkors, so I think this is a compromised optics but it can be a great walk around light lens for the D800E.

when you say the 24-120 was a bad lens, do you mean the 3,5-4,5 ? which is true but nomore with the 24-120 f 4 which according to mansurov's tests is very similar in image quality to the 24-70 f2,8 !

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 08:52 UTC
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11