eos69

Joined on Nov 21, 2012

Comments

Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2
On article Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Preview (130 comments in total)

The price of this lens is currently too high and for me that's the only negative. For landscape usually start aperture is f/8 with tripod. For events f/2.8 is better, but now f/4 may be sufficient when is the picture quality on ISO 25600 at the same level as in the past to ISO 1600!

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2012 at 18:36 UTC as 14th comment
On article Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Preview (130 comments in total)

Nikon lenses are usually more expensive and usually optically inferior. Canon 24-105/4 (although better than the Nikon 24-120/4) is not good enough at f/4. If the new lens be outstanding from f/4 to f/11 it's enough to invest in it, especially if the high price go down after some time. Also outstanding Canon ef 70-200/4 L IS with this lens would be a great combination for high-quality photos and with these two lenses no one will miss the extra range on Canon ef 24-70/4 L hIS to the old 105mm which is just a solid combination with 100-400. New lens also likely to be much less distortion and chromatic aberrations
than the 24-105. Macro ability is certainly welcome and hybrid IS also, like light weight and compact size. This lens will definitely determine its quality, and the biggest drawback is too high a price.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2012 at 15:16 UTC as 18th comment
Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2