Pls. Visit Us Site FOTOINFORMATOR.PL
conphi65: DPREview, when giving specifications for video, give us the PAL equivalents as well please?
Canon is Dead:
D4 > 1DXD800 > 5D mark IIID3200 > 600D,60D,7D...
and... Coolpix L25 > 1GX
muratime: guys, pls check out iso 100 image crops taken from imaging-resourcehttp://i44.tinypic.com/13z4fp.jpghttp://i44.tinypic.com/350lbug.jpgat iso100 markIII is not able to give detail, however not due to pixel size it is due to strange highlighting abilities, as if HDR applied. D800 is very much okay.in second image you'll see the violin player.. check out his arm and his face.. markIII brough some white shades to vilon player skin, I am curious if they were supposed to be there or not? since D800 gives more mono color with a smooth surface.. in impression, D800 process images with strong highlight and extra clarity of sharpness, which 'extra' word is critical here, makes photo not real!!!???regarding iso performance, MarkIII is the best upto now as far as I can see, in higher iso, result is extremely smooth unexpectedly despite HDR like processing..so MarkIII will please us with most if photos, however a bit question if it is really the correct image?
Ok ISO100 in D800 is okay, but when comapre this two camera on iso 6400?!! Mark III rulez.
antoineb: Duly shot at f11 where diffraction must be a clear issue - why?
of course the test scene needs f11 for enough DOF - but surely this cannot take precedence over the need to deliver relevant results?
as it stands, these shots at f11 will suffer from diffraction BEFORE they show limits of the sensor resolution.
therefore these are cute test shots - but they're essentially useless.
These should be re-done at f5.6
D800 is great camera but 5dmarkIII maybe is better.