Parsek

Parsek

Lives in Denmark Denmark
Joined on Apr 12, 2011

Comments

Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
On article Reuters showcases EOS-1D X multiple exposure modes (226 comments in total)

Great, this was big in the early 80s.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2012 at 07:24 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
On article Researchers follow the noise to find composite images (38 comments in total)

A few global blending layers of PS grain, noise etc. should wipe any detectable differences in noise profiles out if done properly. Obviously with some cost, but hardly for web usage.

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 21:28 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon launches EOS 60Da DSLR for astrophotography (229 comments in total)

Great news, very interesting camera. Can not wait to see results.

PS: Canon needs to outfit all future dSLR's with swivel screens.

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2012 at 08:32 UTC as 64th comment | 7 replies
On article Photoshop CS6 Blur Gallery Tutorial (163 comments in total)

Not impressed with any kind of software blur I have seen so far. Come on programmers, you can do better than that!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2012 at 19:01 UTC as 51st comment
In reply to:

snackwells: Wow...the JPG loss of fine detail is frighteningly stark compared to the RAW conversions (see the forest/tree scenes). This is a strictly RAW only camera...at least coupled with the 24-105.

@sdyue "RAW is only useful if one struggles with exposures or ISO sensitivity selection by shooting the old TTL method and badly needs pp"

A remarkably uninformed statement. I´d recommend you pick up some literature on the subject or talk to a real photographer.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2012 at 20:37 UTC
On article Uploading your avatar (100 comments in total)

Good decision. I for one will never use Gravatar. On to upload an avatar.

Link | Posted on Feb 29, 2012 at 14:41 UTC as 34th comment
On article Just posted: Our Sony NEX-7 in-depth review (339 comments in total)
In reply to:

R Valentino: Nice camera, pretty decent IQ for an APS, but I still don't get the point of these types of cameras.

Teeny, tiny camera, GREAT big lens means it's still going to be hanging from your neck. Once you mount a decent lens on the Nex7 for all practical purposes it's the same size as the A900.

Seriously does half a pound really make that much difference? Sony's own A77 is still a much better all around camera and not much bigger.

If it can't fit in a jacket or cargo pants/shorts pockets you might as well use a real camera :-)

Exactly. Thanks for underscoring this.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 16:15 UTC
On article The 15 Minute Makeover: Photoshop Beauty Retouching (168 comments in total)
In reply to:

alienchow: Love all the "i hate retouching" and "In my county, women don't wear makeup" comments. Now that you can show your comment to your girlfriend, wife, significant other, friends, etc. so they can see what a sensitive, politically correct, western zen person you are, let's get back to reality.

If you want to be a professional portrait/beauty/fashion photographer, you will be doing this to some extent, or you won't be making money.

Please realize that by choosing what lighting, focal length, f-stop,background, etc you will be using, you have already retouched the person. Do you take portraits of someone when they roll out of bed in the morning? That is about as natural as they can get. Photoshop is just another tool. You either learn how to use it, or you are behind in the game.. Just learn some discretion, as mentioned in the article.

Great tutorial.

"...let's get back to reality." Funny stuff ;)

Made a living as a portrait photographer doing my "retouching" with lights, film selection, dark room work and optics alone. Yeah I know I am old (37), it was before Photoshop became widely adopted.

That said, I think you are confusing a lot of different things here. For some people a beauty shot does not include a plastic look. There is quite some distance between a face full of morning and acne to the polished ceramic look that has become the standard today, I would say. Surely it has become a necessity to achieve this, for editorial work today. Thankfully not all magazines find it pleasing to eradicate every last bit of personality from peoples skin.

I just find it funny that photographers do not feel the least bit responsible for perpetuating this impossible and unattainable look. And I do know that photography is essentially manipulation. What I don´t like is the current visual discourse and its effect on young people.

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2011 at 17:10 UTC
On article The 15 Minute Makeover: Photoshop Beauty Retouching (168 comments in total)

I like the way she looks with "blemishes".

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2011 at 23:27 UTC as 74th comment
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9