mahonj

mahonj

Lives in Ireland Dublin, Ireland
Works as a Machine Vision Engineer
Joined on Apr 14, 2009

Comments

Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10

Sounds very useful.
As they say, cameras compress at too high a level for most tasks.
I can see uses for it.
I will certainly try it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2015 at 15:51 UTC as 78th comment

a; I cannot see the point of a 1/20,000 second shutter speed - at all.
How many people want photos of a wet dog shaking itself ? or a girl swirling her hair ? Leave it at 1/2000 and ship some images of the above.

b: A companion camera with no zoom lens ?????
To me, that makes no sense. Surely the main point of a companion camera is the zoom. You can already get F1.8 on phone cameras.

c: maybe they could make 2 versions:
An F2.8 3:1 zoom one and a F1.8 fixed focus one.
or a version with both lenses and a sliding sensor that can switch between them.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2015 at 13:35 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies

It would be a lot of use as a machine vision sensor rather than a photography one. I wonder would it have applications in self driving cars ?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 16:37 UTC as 8th comment
On article Readers' Showcase: Luis dos Santos (53 comments in total)

Those are stunning photos.
he really has a talent.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 26, 2015 at 21:27 UTC as 21st comment
On article Opinion: Canon EOS 750D and 760D (321 comments in total)

It is about giving as many options at as many price points as possible for the minimum amount of extra engineering.
The innovation is the 24 Mpix sensor, which is available in 2 different bodies at prices $100 apart.
You don't have to get angry about it, just buy the one which best suits your budget.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 16, 2015 at 21:55 UTC as 44th comment | 9 replies

a: No-one drives around at night with their lights off - they drive around with them on.
Thus, you do not need this capability for automotive applications.

b: The image quality at +72db of gain is fairly awful - but what would you expect with +72 db gain in an image.

c: I think the news is the ability to do +72db if gain at all, or to get usefully clean images with (say) +36 db gain.

As far as I can see, this is about 2x as sensitive as normal sensors.

Which is something, but not driving cars around at night with the lights off.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 09:42 UTC as 30th comment | 5 replies
On Connect post Olympus shows camera module concept (65 comments in total)

It is like an industrial camera, but 4.3" and from Olympus.
So it should be excellent, excellent indeed.

I hope it is affordable and has a simple SDK with all the basic functions implemented first.

(Shutter speed, focus, auto focus, aperture, ISO, single / multi snaps, video of various formats and speeds).

Forget the hdr and the art modes etc.

(Do them when the rest is solid)

Fantastic!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 22:32 UTC as 20th comment
On article Found film: Keep a lookout for photographic treasures (13 comments in total)
In reply to:

totzoli: So what about this:
http://www.fortepan.hu/?view=demo&lang=en
53000 found photos from 1900 to date.

This is a fantastic website.
It is like a Hungarian time machine.

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2014 at 23:46 UTC
On article Canon launches EOS 60Da DSLR for astrophotography (229 comments in total)

Why don't camera companies make the occasional monochrome camera - no bayer filter, no quarter wave plate, just very sensitive, very sharp images.

It would be very specialist and would sell in small-medium numbers, but if you can build an astro version, you should be able to build a mono version.

Apart from the different software/firmware, can anyone think of a reason ?

Canon sell so many 60Ds and 600Ds, they should be able to run a few mono versions.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2012 at 09:48 UTC as 59th comment | 12 replies
On article Why make a small-sensor mirrorless camera? (279 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nerak50: What is someone who is looking for a camera that takes great pictures to do??? Nearly every comment is negative on most every camera. I come to these sites for help. Is there ANY camera worthy of praise?? I just want to purchase a camera, point and shoot or DSLR that takes great pictures AUTOMATICALLY. I know nothing about aperatures or anything. Please help!!

There are loads of excellent cameras.
Here are some I like.
The Panasonic Lx-5
The Sony Nex 5n or C3
Canon Eos 600D
Also Panasonic Lumix TZ20 or TZ18
I could go on, but any of these will not let you down

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2011 at 23:20 UTC
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10