LightBug

Lives in United States Orange County, United States
Works as a Engineer
Joined on Sep 17, 2007

Comments

Total: 49, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ttran88: Waiting for a limited edition K1.

That's going to be a collector's item for sure.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 05:03 UTC
On article Week in Review: One for the history books (158 comments in total)
In reply to:

odpisan: I do not understand some writers of comments here.

Are they so extremly stupid?

For K-1 we have plenty & all kinds of diferent lenses which work perfect on FF.

But some poeople think that if Pentax did not make FF-camera until today there also is no lenses for FF - or what? Why they show their stupidity here & do not first look in the Pentax site?
>:o(((

Jorge, then you need to go argue with the person that said "No brand is better than the other one" in the post above. He is in your mirror.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 07:31 UTC
On article Week in Review: One for the history books (158 comments in total)
In reply to:

odpisan: I do not understand some writers of comments here.

Are they so extremly stupid?

For K-1 we have plenty & all kinds of diferent lenses which work perfect on FF.

But some poeople think that if Pentax did not make FF-camera until today there also is no lenses for FF - or what? Why they show their stupidity here & do not first look in the Pentax site?
>:o(((

That's right Jorge, Pentax is just as good as Nikon.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 06:35 UTC
On article Week in Review: One for the history books (158 comments in total)
In reply to:

odpisan: I do not understand some writers of comments here.

Are they so extremly stupid?

For K-1 we have plenty & all kinds of diferent lenses which work perfect on FF.

But some poeople think that if Pentax did not make FF-camera until today there also is no lenses for FF - or what? Why they show their stupidity here & do not first look in the Pentax site?
>:o(((

Jorge, you are right that Nikon is no better than Pentax, that's why some of us choose Pentax.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 06:14 UTC
On article Week in Review: One for the history books (158 comments in total)
In reply to:

odpisan: I do not understand some writers of comments here.

Are they so extremly stupid?

For K-1 we have plenty & all kinds of diferent lenses which work perfect on FF.

But some poeople think that if Pentax did not make FF-camera until today there also is no lenses for FF - or what? Why they show their stupidity here & do not first look in the Pentax site?
>:o(((

Jorge, obviously you are not stupid. You care or feel insecure enough about Pentax to troll in the comment sections for days on end.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2016 at 19:13 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

robspeed750: The observation that the $1800 investment is quickly outpaced by lens costs is just stupid in light of the the 2x initial cost of the D810, or equivalent(ish) Canon. Basically you can get a Ptax FF camera *AND* a lens or two for the price of the D810 by itself. #duh

Full disclosure: I am a Nikon fanboy and D750/F3 user.

@Thermidor, there is a new 28-105 kit lens announced here:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2115726922/ricoh-adds-15-30mm-f2-8-sdm-wr-and-28-105mm-f3-5-5-6-ed-dc-wr-to-full-frame-lens-range
You can buy that now for $500 to go with K-1. So going with K-1 with a kit only costs $2300 USD.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2016 at 18:00 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: Will this camera work with Pentax 200mm F2.8, 300mm F2.8, 300mm F4, 560mm F5.6 and 600mm F4?

Yep, they will all work great on the K-1.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 08:17 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

Osvaldo Cristo: I had forgotten some of the facts DPR brought in that article, but I remind most of them.

Although I like some of the ideas from Pentax and their general camera design I cannot understand why people could put his/her money on Pentax stuff. The company´s track is extremely erratic and IMO it isn´t worth the risk - mainly if you depend from them to bring your daily butter and bread.

It can explain their lower entry price: they are buying market. It is a pity, because it could be different... at that price it will be more difficult to create a decent customer´s support, to get money to R&D and to return something attractive to the investors.

Anyway I desire good luck to them.

Investing in Pentax SLR system has been the best thing in my photographic endeavors. Pentax and now Ricoh has been producing quality cameras for a long time. For me it started with K100D in 2007, now the system has advanced to K3-II and the FF K-1. Ricoh is a huge company, bigger than Nikon. Given their willingness to release K-1, I would say Ricoh is very committed to their user base, and they have the resource to play in the field for the long term.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 22:13 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (616 comments in total)
In reply to:

iAPX: As usually for Pentax: where are the lenses?!?

Yes, fast full frame lenses, that don't need to be stopped-down, or cropped to work.

Reminds me of my Pentax K10D that was perfect to use old lenses, but didn't have fast lenses, and thus lost it's value to be sold at a bargain, to be replaced by a Nikon D300 (that I still use today!) with fast lenses.

To add to ogl's list:
Released: 24-70mm F2.8, 150-450mm F5.6.
Announced: 15-30mm F2.8, DFA* 70-200mm F2.8.
DA lenses that work on FF: DA 40mm F2.8, DA 70mm F2.4.
All FA, F, A, M, M42 full frame lenses from film era.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 17:31 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

melgross: Considering the sales of Pentax, and how late this camera is, with Canon and Nikon owning the space (even Sony has just about a 5% marketshare), I just don't see the sales for this. Where is a full range of lenses? How long would that take (years)?

Pentax already has full range of lenses for FF, from recently announced/released zooms 15-30 F2.8, 24-70 F2.8, 70-200 F2.8, 150-450 F5.6, to well established FA 31mm, 43mm, 77mm Limited Primes, plus a few of the DA 40mm, 70mm limited primes, which you can all buy brand new. If you don't mind looking in the used market, many high quality auto-focus F, FA lenses are for the picking. And if you venture into the manual focus A, M lenses, all are compatible with the K-mount on all Pentax DSLRs including the K-1. Pentax has much longer history in lenses than Sony.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 08:05 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

gskolenda: I would like to see all the newer Camera platforms that are plus 30 MP, have USB 3.0 instead of USB 2.0 These files are large and take time to move them.

It's not like USB 3.0 is new.

I have never used USB port on my DSLRs to transfer files. I always take out the card and plug it into my computer's card reader. USB3 is nice but it's only on the newer computers. So both computer and camera needs to have USB3 for it to work. I might as well get a USB3 card reader if I have a USB3 capable computer since that's how I work.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 17:51 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

Daniel4: How do I move the focus point?

The 4-way buttons double as focus point selectors.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 17:45 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (972 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sweets: "The rear screen's articulation mechanism is complex and fascinating, but it's not entirely clear to us what the benefit is over an edge-hinged screen than can be rotated to face inwards."...
I do see advantages... as for one: using the cam above the head with dbg and be able to see on the rear screen by.... and same for taking a picture from below/@hiphight... not done with any other... :-) ... in Portrait in stead of landscape....

I feel the new articulation mechanism is genius. Side hinging on my K-S2 actually is a bit far out, the flip down screen on MX-1/XZ-2 is too restrictive angle wise. This new mechanism could allow pointing the LCD at me (I need to look at it for composition) without restricting its angle or being too far away.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 17:13 UTC
In reply to:

kff: USB 2.0 ? Not 802.11ac ?

Probably they feel most people do not transfer images via camera's USB port?

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 10:06 UTC
In reply to:

bizao: Anybody Konws what is the resolution when capture with pixel shift
I didn't find anywhere

36 MP with double chroma resolution.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 10:04 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (972 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dirtistasty2: The Pentax K-1 official site is pretty awesome too, I can really feel that there were caring humans behind this product.

http://www.pentax.com/en/k-1/challengers/challengers01.html

Very nice story, thanks for sharing the link!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 08:29 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (972 comments in total)

I feel like I'm dreaming, $1799 is a much more aggressive price than I had expected, but a great price to get the camera into more people's hands.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 05:57 UTC as 140th comment
In reply to:

justmeMN: I think they should unify their branding, and call all of their cameras Pentax.

In the USA, when I hear the Ricoh brand name, the first thing I think of is photocopiers.

The GR has always been a Ricoh product since the film days, so I think people will be quite upset if it's rebranded as Pentax, just as some Pentax folks were upset when a Ricoh label was put on their beloved DSLR. Both brands have loyal followings, so why mess with the heritage?

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 06:16 UTC
On article Top 5: Hands-on with Nikon D500 (799 comments in total)
In reply to:

LightBug: DSLRs are dead! Long live DSLRs!

My own preference is still DSLR (Pentax), which I feel is best bang for the buck with abundant lenses on the used market for good price.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2016 at 17:50 UTC
On article Top 5: Hands-on with Nikon D500 (799 comments in total)

DSLRs are dead! Long live DSLRs!

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2016 at 05:31 UTC as 102nd comment | 2 replies
Total: 49, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »