Lives in United States United States
Joined on May 30, 2006


Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On photo Daimler-Hudson 1937 in the My Favorite Car - Title with Make / Model please. challenge (19 comments in total)

Its the photographer, not the camera, that counts. Excellent work!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2015 at 20:18 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On photo Viper Drag in the F-16 Fighting Falcon challenge (11 comments in total)
In reply to:

white shadow: A well taken photo but it is an unfair challenge because a normsl person without access to an air refuel tanker would never be able to shoot it.

Not much in life is fair. And I love this photo - well done!!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 14:26 UTC

People keep complaining about the sizes of these lenses, but the way I see it for most outings all I need is the 28mm f/2, 35mm f/2.8 and the 55mm f/1.8 on the A7. Small enough for me, even when compared to my Fuji XE-1 kit.

I already own the 35 and the 55 - they are small enough and simply fantastic lenses. I only hope the 28mm f/2 is as good.

Eventually, I'll either add the 21mm adapter (if its decent) or keep using my Oly 21mm f/3.5 - which is tiny and very good.

Screw the E mount zooms, I agree that they are too large, but who needs them with such sweet and small primes!!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2015 at 23:06 UTC as 42nd comment | 4 replies
On article Fujifilm X-T1 Review (655 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jim Salvas: I think it's fitting that DPR gave this the exact same rating as the EM1. These are closely matched competitors, with about the same amount of pluses and minuses on both sides. It boils down to personal preference between two excellent cameras. This sort of competition should be good for both camps.

There's nothing wrong with that - it simply that there are many fantastic offerings at the moment!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 16:24 UTC
In reply to:

samhain: If I shot Nikon, I'd be getting this lens. The sample shots I've seen have been absolutely beautiful. The bokeh, coma, rendering, micro contrast, 3-d effect, etc, just lovely results.
I've learned to not put so much stock into numbers & resolution testing and focus more on real life shots/examples of what the lens can produce. There's so much more to a lens than numbers. For a landscape lens- yes I want max sharpness. But for a portrait lens, I'm much more concerned with rendering characteristics. does it have 'mojo'?

I've owned lenses that didn't test well but the results were breathtaking. My old (made in Japan) Pentax 77mm is a prime example. That lens can produce portraits that are down right haunting. Rendering & characteristics that I couldn't get out of a canon 85/1.2 or Sony Zeiss 135/1.8. Both of those lenses are best of the best portrait lenses, yet the Pentax 77(especially on a FF film camera) could just do spooky things that I could never recreate with other lenses.

^ - now that's a nice review of this type of lens, thanks for sharing.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 13, 2013 at 20:27 UTC
On photo Reflection in the My best picture this week challenge (5 comments in total)

Fabulous. Print it and hang it with pride.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 13, 2013 at 00:14 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Starry, Starry Night in the Planet Earth challenge (2 comments in total)


Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2013 at 14:05 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo Cairo Nilometer Rhoda Island in the City of Cairo - Egypt challenge (3 comments in total)

Awesome image.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2013 at 13:04 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo Nepal in the Old is Gold challenge (2 comments in total)


Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2013 at 12:45 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 2008 Maserati Gran Turismo in the Black and White photo of 1 Car in HDR challenge (7 comments in total)

Wow, very nice. I'm curious about the PP here. Is this a multi-image pano used to reduce DOF?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 00:37 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply

They look pretty good. There are also some FF shots from the 5d2 on their site as well - doesn't look like it will be usable on FF - no surprise there.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 20:13 UTC as 18th comment
On photo 223 Commonwealth Ave Boston Mass in the Ad campaign: Doorway challenge (3 comments in total)

Yea for a film shot winning!! (especially on a website called dpreview :) )

What film was this, by the way?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2012 at 00:29 UTC as 2nd comment

Just think how you would feel if this were your husband / wife that ended up on the cover? Publishing this story is journalism, publishing this photo (especially with the headline they chose) is pure sensationalism.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2012 at 22:13 UTC as 88th comment
On photo Shanghai Wedding in the Weddings .. challenge (6 comments in total)

It amazes me how many people say that IS is useless for non-static subjects - way to prove them wrong! Beautiful shot.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2012 at 15:52 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Peak Cavern - The Tube in the Spelunking challenge (4 comments in total)

Awesome image.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 00:54 UTC as 4th comment
On photo SUBWAY 1349 in the High Quality Photography challenge (9 comments in total)


Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2012 at 19:32 UTC as 7th comment
On article Just Posted: Pentax K-01 review (355 comments in total)

I really want to like Pentax, but what where they thinking?. K-mount and no EVF? Really? That makes this camera only of interest to those already invested in Pentax glass. Pentax needs to broaden their market and they had an opportunity to do so with this camera but they didn't, sadly.
If this camera was "universal mount" like the NEX then I would have seriously considered it as it would give provided a mirrorless platform with an APS-C sensor and IBIS, which would have made it a unique and truly appealing camera. So sad Pentax. I'll have to stick with my NEX and E-PL2 for now.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2012 at 16:17 UTC as 57th comment

Silly, Silly, Silly. Leica really has lost it.

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 20:04 UTC as 183rd comment | 7 replies
On article Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

Francis Carver: Thank you so much, Pasha001. Thanks for finding this smoking gun for the rest of us.


Photo taken w. X10 on 9 February 2012 WITH the v.1.03 firmware update installed. For those who don't even see a problem with this photo -- the Fujifilm X10 is your camera, no doubt, For others -- stay the heck away!

I guess when you have a DEFECTIVE SENSOR in a camera, no amount of "firmware fix" will fix it. Say, your car's engine blew-up. Will a fancy paint job fix that?

Also, it seems like the version 1.03 "firmware fix" has been so successful, on 10 February 2012 Fujifilm had already pulled it?

The travails of this camera (X10) and its sister cam, the X-S1 will probably be written up in business school textbooks soon as case studies.

I see it, but it doesn't effect the types of photos I take. I've taken countless photos with my X10 so far and I've yet to see a single orb. Of course, I don't use it to take night city-scapes, that's what my 5d is for silly.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 16:20 UTC
In reply to:

Michael49: My 6 year old 5D still trumps my NEX 5N in terms of image quality (both low and high ISO), and that's with using equally good glass on each, so I'll be interested to see how the XP1 compares. The XP1 does look promising with this new sensor, especially with the lack on an AA filter.

Here you go....




Direct link | Posted on Jan 13, 2012 at 15:16 UTC
Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »