Light theme [beta]
We're testing a lighter alternative to the regular DPReview theme. Both options will stay.
For more information, click here. Don't forget to leave some feedback.

Marcelobtp

Lives in Brazil Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Works as a Student/photographer
Joined on Nov 26, 2010

Comments

Total: 247, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: Wow, UHS-1 SD cards are so much more expensive compared to CFast cards for 4K cameras like the Canon XC10 ;)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1164632-REG/pny_technologies_p_sdx256u395_ge_256gb_elite_sdxc_uhs_1_card.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1186716-REG/lexar_lc256crbna3600_pro_3600x_cfast_memory.html

BTW , why would anyone want to use a SDHC card in any 4K camera when SDXC cards are a dime a dozen.

I think you inverted who is more expensive than who...

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 04:05 UTC

Good! Thats something important to the industry and hollywood can pay for it, but whats the actual resolution of the video?
How is Hi iso?
This has a space reserved in VR videos.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2016 at 00:37 UTC as 10th comment
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: I would like to see an RX FF series with 24MPx BSI sensor and an integrated zoom 35-70. Maybe an interesting camera.

Thank you sir

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 02:31 UTC
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: I would like to see an RX FF series with 24MPx BSI sensor and an integrated zoom 35-70. Maybe an interesting camera.

i would like you to stop being such a troll

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2016 at 11:07 UTC
In reply to:

falconeyes: Before people get too excited ...
This is a 220mm F4 lens at the long end.

A lens like the Nikon 70-200/4 is both cheaper and lighter than this camera. So it all comes down to actual image quality, how well the lens really resolves.

The diffraction limit for F4 is 1.34µm, the pixel pitch is 2.4µm. So, if this lens is diffraction-limited stopped down to F5.6, it may be a winner. Otherwise, it won't deliver anything a DSLR cannot at the same price and weight (at the long end).

Looking for4ward to an actual lens test. This is where the RX100m3/4 really shines.

By your logic why not get a 200mm fixed will possibly be cheaper and weight less too, possibly brighter too. Because a travel all in one camera is not need, you always know what you gonna get in the field.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2016 at 14:44 UTC
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)

I would like to see an RX FF series with 24MPx BSI sensor and an integrated zoom 35-70. Maybe an interesting camera.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 18:50 UTC as 10th comment | 4 replies
On article First sample images from 20MP Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III (197 comments in total)

Very visible CA auto correction artifacts and this has to be one of the worst bokeh balls ive seen in a long time. BUT for the price and everything put togheter this hold its value, if it was 1000 i guess i would be buying. Right now other pryorities, good performance, resolution, DR, noise(soso), colors are somewhat better then the usual sony standard. The lens for what it is very impressive, i think it looks to be the best 24-600 i've ever saw.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 18:43 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

falconeyes: Before people get too excited ...
This is a 220mm F4 lens at the long end.

A lens like the Nikon 70-200/4 is both cheaper and lighter than this camera. So it all comes down to actual image quality, how well the lens really resolves.

The diffraction limit for F4 is 1.34µm, the pixel pitch is 2.4µm. So, if this lens is diffraction-limited stopped down to F5.6, it may be a winner. Otherwise, it won't deliver anything a DSLR cannot at the same price and weight (at the long end).

Looking for4ward to an actual lens test. This is where the RX100m3/4 really shines.

LOL, I was trying to comprehend what mad logic falconeyes was thinking.
Anyway, by the results seems a superb lens.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2016 at 17:22 UTC
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: Amazing camera. Sony continues to push the boundaries of possible. Unfortunately, 600mm is not long enough. Luckily, Nikon B700 shoots 4k video at 1440mm.

Sorry, i was not being serious at all...
I think you should be talking to the Boss of Sony, not me.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: Amazing camera. Sony continues to push the boundaries of possible. Unfortunately, 600mm is not long enough. Luckily, Nikon B700 shoots 4k video at 1440mm.

Sarcasm?
Who defines the long enough definition?
I think 1440mm is not long enough, Long enough will be when with a lens i would be able to see the back of my head then.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 20:59 UTC

Too much info!
Refresh rate of the EVF?
Max fps with continuous AF?

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 16:44 UTC as 82nd comment | 1 reply

The most fun part of those test scenes. Read all comments! LOL! HAHAHA!

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2016 at 17:41 UTC as 71st comment

Is the 35-50 1.8 coming too?

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 14:42 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

PeterTom: When I sum the weight and price of these 3 lenses:
Canon 50mm 1.8 STM
Canon 85mm 1.8 USM
Canon 100mm 2.0 USM
Then I get 1044 grams and 880.24 Euro (looking at cheapest prices in reliable on-line shops around me).
The Sigma is 1490 grams and 1249 Euro.
It is about 40% more in both numbers...
Can the lens have that much better IQ (compared to the above listed ones) that you will not mind carrying 400 more grams (another lens' weight, and I usually leave the 85mm at home, 50mm and 100mm are usually enough to carry) and pay 40% more?
For me the answer is "no", but if flexibility of a zoom is highest priority, then your opinion may differ.

Did you forget the space saving? The time consuming on swaping lenses, and the risk of dirt on the sensor, the qualities of that for even making video? 100 f/2 vs 100 1.8 is not negligeable.
The thing is this lacks IS! And seems to not have stellar performance on CA dept.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 14:38 UTC
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (931 comments in total)

The same 18mpx again! That has to be the most profitable apsc sensor ever! Even more then the sony 16mpx one

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 14:05 UTC as 160th comment | 1 reply
On article UPDATED: Sony a6300 real-world samples (368 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: I m not sure why but when i look to sony videos and photos i feel that lack reds to it and lacks color discrimination, don't know, feels like they are cheating on colors to get more DR and Hi ISO performance, but i can't explain scientificaly, maybe thats why they never get the color science right, and maybe thats why Canon doesn't improve in DR. LOL. Even fujis and nikons to me lacks something, although between Sony nikon and fuji i prefer the fuji colors.

You dont need to be rude, if i said that they were flat your comment would make more sense btw...

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2016 at 02:25 UTC
On article UPDATED: Sony a6300 real-world samples (368 comments in total)

I m not sure why but when i look to sony videos and photos i feel that lack reds to it and lacks color discrimination, don't know, feels like they are cheating on colors to get more DR and Hi ISO performance, but i can't explain scientificaly, maybe thats why they never get the color science right, and maybe thats why Canon doesn't improve in DR. LOL. Even fujis and nikons to me lacks something, although between Sony nikon and fuji i prefer the fuji colors.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2016 at 13:48 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

joelR42: Now if Sony will just support write speeds faster than 30MB/s...

I would say no current standard garantees more than 30MB/s, not card.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 21:59 UTC
In reply to:

joelR42: Now if Sony will just support write speeds faster than 30MB/s...

Are you sure about it? This is not about the minimum speed? Im pretty sure my card writes at 45MB/s.
I think theres a confusion between max speed and minimum here.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
On article UPDATED: Sony a6300 real-world samples (368 comments in total)

16-70 f/4 terrible quality. Noise reduction is kicking bad on 1600 up.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 21:24 UTC as 45th comment | 9 replies
Total: 247, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »