Thorgrem: The logical conclusion of all these buy guides is that Amazon greatly overestimated the demand of Sony camera's and still have a huge stock left that needs to be sold. Why else such useless articles without use cases?
Because these are the best buys at this price range. That's why.
technotic: The bigger story here is is this the beginning of the implosion of the photography industry in general? Samsung are a highly profitable company from what I know and could easily sustain some losses in the camera division if they saw a future in this business. Is this sign of things to come?
Just a Photographer, Sony digital imaging division includes professional Hollywood and broadcast cameras, live broadcast equipment, accessories, audio, etc. That history dates back to 20 years. Samsung had no such history in imaging division. Especially in broadcast division Sony is #1 in market. Canon will disappear before Sony imaging division does.
Photato: Would love to see this baby scaled down for 1" sensor.
RX100 is old but the G9X has same specs. Sensor isn't that much different either. Plus street prices are about $100 lower for new and $200 lower for refurbished / open box
I did compare them side by side at
before responding to your post
Ity's not that much smaller than RX100 which actually sells cheaper ($379) one seller on Amazon
G9X has slower lens than III and IV (F4.9 at tele vs F2.8 at tele) and unlike those cameras is missing EVF too
G9X is not that much smaller than the original RX100 which sells cheaper than $499 now
Ricoh lens is slower with F2.8. Given RX100 is F1.8 at wide angle, most of that APSC advantage is lost. Ricoh doesn't have useful zoom, or EVF, o great video, and it's not even smaller than RX100. Rx100 wins hands down.
RX100 is already F1.8 at wide end. . RX100 has zoom that is far more useful and it is still a small camera. There is no need for fixed lens RX100. No one is going to buy it over the regular more useful RX100
Photato: Wow I thought the RX1 was Sony experiment testing the waters of FF Mirrorless !Obviously this is a luxury item and I would expect nothing but top notch performance from it, we know that sensor is awesome but would be the Optics too?When I compared my EOS M & 22mm Lens to the original RX1 I saw little difference in proportion to cost.
Silly claims as RX1 is one of the highest rated lens on dxomark
Donnie G: Curious to see how the Red Raven Base I/O package stacks up against Canon's C 300 II in terms of price, performance, and acceptance within the professional cinematography user community? Should be an interesting matchup since they both use the Canon EF lens mount natively. Competition is good for everybody, but even Red knows that their chances for success are much improved with a Canon EF lens mount. Go Red! :))
Speedbooster cannot be used on native Canon mount due to flange distance. It's available for Fuji, M4/3 and Sony E-mount.
Lets not forget FS7 which is only half the price, but it has superior FPS than both. It not only can use Canon lenses with Metabones adapter, but it can do something special with Canon lenses (FF look) with speedbooster adapter which cameras with native Canon mount can't do as Speedbooster requires mirrorless mount.
kodakrome: Great specs on this Sony. But great specs don't make a great camera. There are all kinds of usability issues that can be more important than pixel level noise at high ISO's. What's important to a real photographer could be entirely different than what's important to a gearhead.
That's just one bblogger who is a nobody opinion.Here is someone else who highly recommends it
Henrikw: This certainly hasn't put me off acquiring this little beast. Combined with the amazing AF capabilities, Sony has shown Canon and Nikon what innovation looks like. Watch and learn. Well done Sony!
"Are you kidding?"
No, he isn't kidding as main sensor AF is far more accurate than DSLRs that has a separate AF sensor.
Mister Joseph: Wait, can the a6000 or the old A7; cameras that I can afford, do this too?
Do what? A6000 has eye AF
Fotoni: Yet another expensive camera with crippled 8-bit low bitrate video compression.
95MB/s (760Mbit/s) write speed cards are not expensive anymore. They can write RAW 12-bit with 1080p30 or Prores 4K 30p 10-bit 422
Blackmagic did it right for video compression. Other companies are still learning...
Even $6,000 C100 MK II only does 8 bit
10 bit video might be too much data for A7R2 (heat issues)
BigOne: "Sony’s extensive collection of FE lenses"
Of which there are eight.
12 native ‘FE’ full frame lenses plus zeiss loxia lenses
CaptureAll: Good review but you should have included the Nexus 4 and iPhone 5S.
Going slightly OT here; the main benefit (imho) is regular OTA updates, both of the above have them. All other Androids get updates when your carrier approves them, which takes months, or may never happen at all. Sure, you can root your device then put on a custom ROM but. not everyone wants or knows how to do that.
My point is hardware is good but if software is buggy or lacks a feature the updates (to the camera) my not come as quickly as the Google Nexus or iPhone devices.
Z1 is better sexier looking phone with glass on both sides. LG looks cheap next to it.
Z1 looks and feels premium. LG looks and feels like a toy.
Z1 is dust and water proof with dedicated camera button to take photos even under water. LG would be dead if it gets wet.
So it's not as one sided as your continuous anti Z1 comments would suggest.
Panasonic were so influenced by Sony that they even copied the naming system (i,e Nexx7). Where is GX2, GX3 --- GX6? Sony inherited the naming system from Minolta where 7 series were higher end enthusiast and 5 series were lower specs than 7 Series. And Minolta also had 9 for professional cameras, i.e Minolta Maxxum 9000 (same system that Sony inherited, A900, A99, etc).
Sony bought Minolta, but I can't see why Panasonic would choose to call it 7, unless they have just decided that they are going to follow the same Minolta naming system.
Scott Greiff: At $4.99 a piece to add "functionality" to your camera, "Shaft" is indeed appropriate.
And you bought a camera that is never able to add more "functionality", other than buying a new model.
That's far more pathetic "shaft"
$4.99 vs $900 buying a new model
X100s Studio shots
MrSkelter: This doesn't look much better than my K-01 with a FA limited lens. More testament to the Pentax than a slight to the Fuji though wow that lens is soft up close with the white flowers.