rjjr: Has Sigma improved the high ISO performance of their sensors over the last iteration?
Because this camera not for beginners and easy shooters. .. For pros high iso is 200. ..200 is very very high iso for real photographers."----That's nonsense.
Everlast66: Looks like for the design of the back panel they hired a washing machine designer ;p
Why is the finder in such an awkward position, and why make the grip shorter, when the main advantage of large bodies is a large grip.They also made this gigantic body and didn't even put a flippable screen?
I was thinking it looked more like a microwave oven. The finder does look to be in an unfortunate location.
Has Sigma improved the high ISO performance of their sensors over the last iteration?
I see the camera phone as the modern day Kodak Brownie, but a lot easier to carry around.
Free Jazz: no EVF...
No EVF - No Sale...maybe next time.
rjjr: I'm very interested in seeing how the 90mm macro compares to my Canon 100L IS macro (with adapter) on my A6000.
Regardingthe pricing: Both of these lenses are priced about the same (90mm is $50 more) but add the cost of the adapter to use the Canon on the A6000 and the 90mm winds up costing less.
Oops, my mistake the price of the 90 is 999 Euros, not dollars, which puts a different spin on it. Sorry for any confusion.
At current conversion rates that puts the price of the 90mm about $130 more than the 100L IS and the adapter I selected. Still, not so bad especially if the 90 performs better than the the adapted 100 in regards to AF speed, focus accuracy and stabilization.
If a more expensive adapter is selected for the 100, the 90 is a couple of hundred less.
Walt Schwab: So Sony's into making coffee mugs now... what a laugh.How about spending your time on production of REAL lenses instead of empty promises.
Getting close to dumping Sony
I have a Canon 24-105 coffee cup.
I'm very interested in seeing how the 90mm macro compares to my Canon 100L IS macro (with adapter) on my A6000.
mpgxsvcd: The astronomy community would be very interested in this sensor.
Not to mention law enforcement, the military and other government agencies.
rjjr: Who holds the copyright on the photos when a camera is set up in a forest and the shutter is triggered by a motion detector?
Would the EXIF notation be valid in the monkey issue?
Who holds the copyright on the photos when a camera is set up in a forest and the shutter is triggered by a motion detector?
Hugo808: Bet I could mimic this in Lightroom. Just gimme five minutes....
No photograph is "real"
Don Karner: On shots of the little girl, seems like the hair is always out of focus and even the eyes mostly. Did the camera just miss the focus or was that intentional?Most of the shots seem a touch soft.
I was wondering about the same thing.
andy816896: As far as I can tell you you can buy a better spec'd 100d for about the same money these days so what's the point...?
A little over a month ago I did just that. No regrets.
Biological_Viewfinder: It's a design-fail. No matter which way you pull it out of a bag, something is going to be snagging. It looks awkward.While I appreciate the innovation, this still leaves them behind.
It looks like you can't put it in a small bag.
rjjr: I voted with my wallet and picked up the only DSLR body introduced this year having the IQ I prefer that would work well for my job with the lenses I already own (without an adapter) and is the size and weight I can easily cart around at a price I can afford to pay.
I voted with my wallet and picked up the only DSLR body introduced this year having the IQ I prefer that would work well for my job with the lenses I already own (without an adapter) and is the size and weight I can easily cart around at a price I can afford to pay.
(unknown member): Very disappointing. No performance improvements and no additional features or improvements to existing tools that I that I can see.
Aren't feature updates restricted to CC now?