tecnoworld: fuji is #1 in fw updates.
They stopped in august. After about 9 months from the release. Fuji goes on for years after the product release. And they do that for every product.
fuji is #1 in fw updates.
Nicholas128: ... a thousand dollars? Wow that's expensive for this camera.
rrrroger, but not decent dx fast zooms. just the huge and uber expensive ff ones.
tecnoworld: Stunning. Is there an online tutorial to select the right parts you want in ps, to blend into a single image? Thx.
Thx a lot!
ms18: isn't this ettl instead?
As a lightroom user those words are a bit like Arabic to my ears :-(
but thanks all the same! congratulations again!
tecnoworld: I said this from the very beginning: they should have rebranded a samsung nx1 and bundled an intelligent adapter to nikon lenses. It would have had better specs, would have been available yesterday and nikonians wouldn't even have noticed that.
I hope so. Being a Samsung's orphan, I hope some better apsc camera comes from nikon, able to surpass nx1, by 2018.
Don, exactly, that's why a nx1 in disguise called d500 would have made a lot of sense!
Am I wrong somehow?
I said this from the very beginning: they should have rebranded a samsung nx1 and bundled an intelligent adapter to nikon lenses. It would have had better specs, would have been available yesterday and nikonians wouldn't even have noticed that.
bmwzimmer: DPreview, Please do a comparison between the D500, 7Dii, and A6300, & NX1 shooting Ice Hockey (through glass) or a evening football game or indoor basketball game. It's the only way to test if Mirrorless cameras can compete with DSLR's in sports/wildlife photography
Nx1 with fw 1.4 has improved 100% in af on moving targets. My personal hit rate, with in focus subject, passed from about 45% to over 90%, at 15fps, on a child running towards me in mid/good light.
Af in low light improved even more.
It's now really comparable to d4s, if used with knowledge and right settings. Unfortunately, only eosHD cared to test the latest fw and they did for video only.
Jiggeroo: I seriously wish this product does not do well as this will force Sony to do either of these: 1. Provide more support to APSC by releasing more lenses. Seriously, the lens line up is lacking without 2.8 zooms, only overpriced f4 ones. 2. Let go of APSC E mount completely.
You can easily tell what Sony is doing here by releasing the a6300, they just want to silence the people wanting an upgrade from the a6000 while disguising the fact that they will no longer release more lenses for the system... and please do NOT tell me to use FE lenses instead.
T3, samsung does a 50-150/2.8 for apsc. That's equivalent to 75-225 on 35mm.
tecnoworld: Gorgeous! Where exactly did you take this? Care to post maps coordinates? Thx.
Thx a lot! I live at less than 300km from there! Definitely worth going!
Stunning. Is there an online tutorial to select the right parts you want in ps, to blend into a single image? Thx.
Gorgeous! Where exactly did you take this? Care to post maps coordinates? Thx.
Tomx72: No BSI, no IBIS, no 2.8/17-50 or similar lens = no deal.
Agreed. Tech from 2 years ago and lack of fast zooms.
tecnoworld: "Other professional caliber video features include the ability to record Full HD at 120 fps at 100 Mbps, another first for α interchangeable lens cameras with APS-C sized sensors."
What??? The nx1 does 120fps from full sensor readout at 80mb/sec HEVC h.265, which is way better than 100mb/sec h.264!!!
Nerd and Zenetic, I'm used to those comments, try to be more original. What's nx1? A camera whose tech is 2 years ahead this sony...and nx1 was released 1.5 years ago.
Is it dead? Really? Mine works perfectly, and so do all the others in the hands of wise ppl :-D
Hat: ok, so the first with inferior specs! Cool!
"Other professional caliber video features include the ability to record Full HD at 120 fps at 100 Mbps, another first for α interchangeable lens cameras with APS-C sized sensors."
tecnoworld: At 16fps, it beats the samsung nx1 by 1 frame, but nx1 can do 15fps with AF and exposure, while this can do 14fps with those features on. Yet nx1 has 8MP pixels more, hence has to have faster readout and processing speed.
Curious to see the 4k compared with that from NX1.
Shortest, I find the following specs:
14fps (with AF / AE)16fps (without AF / AE)
new boyz: yup. this is a comparison you will hardly see on websites/blog, due to the target difference, but actually the NX1 does everything the 1Dx mk2 does at about 1/6th of its price. Of course you have an APS-C sensor with probably less high iso capabilities, but you also have 8MP more for cropping and longer reach (keeping crop factor into the equation). And NX1 has highly efficient HEVC codec for video, letting you use a normal SD card to record internally.
Definitely. I think even 10fps is too fast. I was making a consideration about processing power. Considering the 8mp more and parallel af/exposure computation, I think the cpu in nx1 is even more powerful than the one in this new canon.
Anyway this new camera is a beast and nobody denies that.