Previous page Next page

Studio Tests (Full frame)

The Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM delivers truly excellent results on full frame cameras - again it's at least as good as anything else in its class. Sharpness is pretty impressive even wide open, and superb across the frame at F5.6. However distortion and vignetting are higher than on APS-C, as is normally the case.

Sharpness At F1.4, central sharpness is already extremely high, and the corners aren't bad at all. Stop down to F2 and the central sharpness reaches dizzying heights. By F4 sharpness is excellent right across the frame, with the very best results achieved at F5.6 - F8. Diffraction starts to take the edge off thereafter, but there's still no reason not to use F16 if the additional depth of field is required.
Chromatic Aberration Lateral chromatic aberration is exceptionally low. You may see a little fringing towards the edges and corners if you go looking for it, but it's scarcely worth worrying about.
Vignetting Vignetting is, as usual, much stronger on full frame compared to APS-C, with a 2 stop drop in brightness in the extreme corners at F1.4. This is pretty much what we'd expect from a fast prime, and no better or worse than other 35mm F1.4 lenses.
Distortion Distortion becomes more visible on full frame compared to APS-C, but at 0.8% barrel it's not likely to be visible, let alone objectionable, with anything other than highly geometric compositions. Again the Sigma is no worse than other fast 35mm primes - if anything it's slightly better.

Macro Focus

Macro - 174 x 116 mm coverage
Measured magnification: 0.21x
Distortion: Mild barrel

Minimum focus distance*: 28.5cm
Working distance**: 14.7cm
Focal length: 35mm
* Minimum focus is defined as the distance from the camera's sensor to the subject
** Working distance is measured from the front of the lens to the subject

As you'd expect, it's a similar story on full frame to what we saw on APS-C when shooting at the lens's minimum focus distance. The image is a little soft wide open, but the center sharpens up very well by F2.8. Stop down to F8 and the image is sufficiently sharp across the frame, and free from chromatic aberration, that you could use this lens for copy work if you were prepared to correct the slight barrel distortion. Very, very impressive.

Specific image quality issues

As always, our studio tests are backed up by taking hundreds of photographs with the lens across a range of subjects, and examining them in detail. This allows us to confirm our studio observations, and identify any other issues which don't show up in the tests. The Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM turned out to live up the promise shown in the studio tests, performing consistently well at all subject distances and in a wide range of lighting conditions.


It's not unusual for fast primes to struggle with flare when shooting into the light - all that glass means there's plenty of surface area for internal reflections. The Sigma 35mm F1.4 however seems remarkably resistant - pointing the lens directly into the low winter sun scarcely fazes it at all. As usual you'll get best results using the hood by default (and it'll also help protect the front element).

In the first example below we've deliberately placed the sun at the edge of the frame and stopped right down to F16, which makes any flare patterns most resolved and distinct. Sure enough there's some radial streaking from the light source, but what's impressive is how little effect there is on the right side of the frame.

The second example illustrates a tricky situation shooting a backlit subject with an APS-C camera, using a fairly-normal working aperture of F8; here the sun is directly impinging on the front element and the hood can't help at all. Again the lens has handled this pretty well, without any excessive patterning or streaking.

Canon EOS 6D, F16, sun at edge of frame Canon EOS 650D, F8, sun just outside frame

Chromatic aberration

Our studio tests reveal that the 35mm F1.4 exhibits very low lateral chromatic aberration (colour fringing towards the corners of the frame), and our real-world shooting shows that Sigma has also done an impressive job of minimizing longitudinal CA too (i.e. colour fringing around out-of-focus elements at large apertures). The overall result is very impressive - there's scarcely anything to worry about here at all.

The examples below are effectively torture-tests for the two types of CA. The first shows negligible fringing along high-contrast edges in the corner of the image on full frame, which is a pretty impressive result. The second shows some colour fringing around high contrast out-of-focus elements when the lens is shot wide open - magenta in front of the plane of focus, cyan behind - but for such a fast lens it's really very low.

Lateral Chromatic Aberration
F8, Canon EOS 6D 100% crop, bottom right

Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration
F1.4, Canon EOS 6D 100% crop


The tests show that the 35mm F1.4 exhibits about 2 stops vignetting wide open, which is pretty typical for its class. The fairly gentle falloff pattern means it's not especially intrusive - in many real-world images it will disappear into the natural variations of brightness across the frame. In fact, in many cases we prefer an image with a touch of vignetting to one without - it can help frame the subject. It's also trivial to correct in post-processing when necessary (but note that in-camera corrections won't work with this lens).

The rollover below compares an image shot at F1.4 using the Canon EOS 6D with a version that's had the vignetting corrected using Photoshop's generic lens correction tools. There's no inherently right or wrong answer here - which you prefer is very much a personal choice.

Canon EOS 6D, F1.4 Vignetting corrected in PS

Background blur ('bokeh')

One genuinely desirable, but difficult to measure aspect of a lens's performance is the ability to deliver smoothly blurred out-of-focus regions when trying to isolate a subject from the background, generally when using a long focal length and/or a large aperture. Its fast F1.4 maximum aperture means the Sigma can give usefully-blurred backgrounds when used carefully, if that's what you're after.

Much of the time, the character of the blur is quite attractive, and the transition from in-focus to out-of-focus regions is rendered smoothly. Where the Sigma can fall down, though, is with complex backgrounds, which it can render in a distinctly fussy fashion. The answer to this, of course, is to choose your backgrounds carefully (which is one of the most important tenets of photography anyway); it's also important to bear in mind that out-of-focus regions which appear ugly viewed onscreen at 100% can look much better in print.

The examples below were both shot on the EOS 6D, and give an idea of the how the lens renders out of focus regions wide open at F1.4. The distant background in the first example doesn't look very pretty when viewed close-up, with point highlights on the fountain showing up as bright rings, and the tree branches a jumble of green and magenta. But the crops displayed here represent a large print (~24"/60cm wide), which you may well not examine quite so closely.

EOS 6D, F1.4 Background details (50%)
EOS 6D, F1.4 Background detail

In the second sample the story is more complicated; on the whole the lens has drawn the out-of-focus areas quite attractively. But again point highlights to the lower right are reproduced as hard-edged bright rings, and the sign upper left shows plenty of CA. We wouldn't consider this as reason not to buy the lens unless you have very specific tastes or requirements, though.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 21

Just received my second copy (for Nikon) of this lens. First one had inaccurate Focus (needed a camera internal adjustment of +15) and it still had random front and backfocus. Really annyoing. The second copy of the lens (+14) is a bit better but still not very accurate. Has the same random focus issue when doing the focus test on a tripod. In a real life scenario it feels better though. Wenn it hits it is very very sharp and shows barely any optical flaws even at f1.4 (despite vignetting). It is really incredibly sharp at its widest aperture and when stopped down slightly it becomes surreal sharp. Very nice. Such a pity the focus isn't too accurate with this lens.

p.S. A badly adjusted AF wouldn't be that bad if it is constant. You could adjust it with the "dock". This "random back and front focus" problem though can't be solved with adjustment. It is a quality control or design flaw.

My frustrated score for this lens would be *** but if it works it's better than that!


i got mine yesterday but focusing doesnt feel right. I tried setting up tripod with d7200 and fine tune the AF but still not very confident about the focus. Should i try anything else?


Thanks for the review. I've purchased it after reading good reviews here. My first test shots:



How is this with long exp? Like night images and such?

And, will this be better to use on crop than the 50mm A?


The 50mm A on crop will bi very narrow! I'd get the 35mm Sigma.

If you shoot Nikon, I'd get the 200$ 35mm 1.8 DX though. I don't know the Canon equivalent.


i got one!! crazy images at 1.4


Recent owner of it, very solid and sharp. I'm not sure i like the contrast of it that much over other lenses but it's a great over all lense.
I know it's short-ish focal length so I guess I should have low expectations in the Bokeh department but I do not like the Bokeh on it. Great wide open editorial style shots.

No noticeable distortion and overall CA/Moire not noticeable either.

Nikon D800E


This lens is extremely amazing! It's sharp as hell! I just recently bought this lens 4 months ago, it focuses really fast.

Nevertheless, I would just like to share and ask for your thoughts about the problem I encountered a two weeks ago. I first tested the AF button on my Canon 6D, I was on AI Servo, the lens was on AF mode and at f1.4. When I started shooting a moving object, the Aperture's iris suddenly locked to the minimum aperture. It temporarily unable to focus, the view finder was dark due to the constricted iris. It was a relief and the Iris went to normal operation when I removed the lens from the body, but after several testings and using higher aperture f4 - f8 on multiple shots (not using the AF back button), I again, encountered the same problem. Now, I have been having the same issue every time I use higher aperture on AF mode.

Appreciate your thoughts and feedback.

Note: The lens is still in its' 1 year warranty period.

Thanks for reading.


I bought this lens last year after agonising over the choice btween it and the Canon 35 1.4L. Glad I did. I have used it extensively on both 5D MkII and 5D MkIII with no problems. It is exceptionally sharp and has excellent build quality. In use it feels good the focus ring being smooth and well damped. The auto focus is quick and when I did my normal check to see if the lens had either back or front focus error, I found it had neither irrespective of which camera it was fitted to. The only downside is that it does not have the weather sealing of the Canon L lens but this is a minor point as far as I am concerned.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting

I've been contemplating purchasing this lens for some time because of it's quality and great price of $899. I'm glad I waited because I got in on an Lightning Deal the other day and purchased it for only $699. WOW!


That's a great deal. I paid full price and even then it's worth every penny.


What is an Amazon lightning deal???? thanks... Greg

munro harrap

"The focus ring is nicely damped and operates smoothly. It rotates in "Canon" style, however, which is the exact opposite of how the focus ring works on Nikkor lenses. If you're used to the Nikon way of manual focusing, the Sigma lens may be a challenge for your muscle memory. And you'll also have to remember that the focus assist in the viewfinder assumes a Nikon lens and consequently suggest the wrong direction of focus ring movement."

This is from the Photozone review, and yes, it makes a crucial difference.If you make a lens for a camera it has to relate to the requirements of that camera system, so Nikon users buy Sigma at their peril, unfortunately, because we are definitely missing out on suitable machinery. There's the new 24-105mm F4 Art, as well as the 35mm F1.4 and the 18-35mm F1.8 (very useful if you have a D7100 that gets noisy at 400 and above.)


I bought one of these lenses to photograph ballet performance/practice/rehearsal sessions in dimly lit theatrical settings. Focusing was frustratingly slow, after each attempt to use it I ended up switching to my Canon 24-105 which had no problems whatsoever focusing. My camera is Canon 5D M3. I really wanted to like this lens, but alas I ended up returning to the retailer after several days of tries.

Stealthy Ninja

I bought one of these just after hearing Roger Cicala say he was surprised how good it was... it was just out, so I was taking a little bit of a risk (it was this or the Canon 35 1.4L). I'm so happy I took that risk. This lens is my favourite lens I've owned.


I was deciding between the Nikon and the Sigma. Talk to a friend and he said "If you really want the Nikon, buy his Nikon 35mm 1.4g and he will buy the Sigma."

Went out and bought the lens and I am so happy.


Just bought one last week. All I can say is WOW. The sharpest lens I own. Tested from 2 ft to infinity. Left & right outer focus points - Flawless!


i've read of focus issues for the sigma 35mm 1.4 on the newer canon full frames on amazon reviews.

Comment edited 54 seconds after posting
Stealthy Ninja

No problems on my 1Dx.

unknown member
By (unknown member) (Aug 31, 2013)

I just bought one! :)


Probably and currently the best 35mm in the market and not one single comment

Total comments: 21