Previous page Next page

Studio Tests

The Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Macro performs quite creditably for a superzoom; shot at normal working apertures around F5.6-F11, it delivers pretty good sharpness at all focal lengths. In a marked departure from previous Sigma superzooms, though, pincushion distortion is unusually strong in the middle of the range.

Sharpness Sharpness results are slightly mixed. The tests show a quite specific weakness, with rather soft edges to the frame when the lens is shot wide open in the 28-50mm range. Stop down to more-usual working apertures of F5.6-F11, though, and things improve dramatically. Like all superzooms the 18-250mm is weakest in the telephoto range, and it's best to shoot at F8 if possible.
Chromatic Aberration Chromatic aberration is kept reasonably low. It's worst at wideangle, where there's moderately strong red/cyan fringing towards the edge and corner of the frame. It diminishes on zooming in, and is practically zero at 80mm, before becoming more visible again at full telephoto. Here the fringing is of the visually intrusive green/magenta type.
Vignetting Vignetting is overall very low. As usual it's worst at wideangle and maximum aperture, but even here it's only a little over a stop, and essentially disappears by F5.6. In practical use this counts as nothing to worry about.
Distortion Distortion is high, even by the inflated standards of superzooms. At 18mm there's quite strong barrel distortion, with substantial re-correction towards the corners. Zoom in and this changes to pincushion, which is most pronounced around 35mm at a startlingly-high -3.75%. This reduces progressively in zooming in further, but never goes away (and is always potentially visible in geometric compositions).

Macro Focus

Macro - 54 x 36 mm coverage
Measured magnification: 0.41x
Distortion: Negligible

Minimum focus distance*: 28.5cm
Working distance**: 8cm
Focal length: 250mm (400mm equiv)
* Minimum focus is defined as the distance from the camera's sensor to the subject
** Working distance is measured from the front of the lens to the subject

As the 'Macro' label suggests, the Sigma 18-250mm offers best-in-class close-up performance for an SLR superzoom. The measured closest focus distance (using manual focus) is a fair bit shorter than Sigma specifies, at 28.5cm rather than 35cm. In autofocus mode the camera body won't be able to confirm focus quite so close, though.

Central sharpness at F6.3 isn't bad at all, and gets only fractionally better at F8, before gradually declining at smaller apertures due to diffraction. In our flat-field chart test, corners are soft wide open and improve progressively on stopping down, with optimal sharpness at F11-16. Distortion is minimal, but there's visible blue/yellow fringing due to lateral chromatic aberration.

Full Frame (FX) Coverage

The Canon, Nikon and Sony mount versions of this lens will mount on full-frame DSLRs; on Nikon cameras DX crop mode will be automatically selected (and the camera will therefore shoot at reduced resolution). The lens's image circle doesn't cover the 35mm full frame format properly at any focal length, giving severe vignetting; this effect is very obvious and well-defined at 18mm, but gets increasing diffuse at longer focal lengths. At 250mm the corners are reasonably well illuminated when the lens is focused to infinity, but not with closer subjects.

18mm, infinity 80mm, infinity 250mm, infinity
18mm, 1m 80mm, 1m 250mm, 1m

The bottom line is that if you shoot using a full frame camera - or plan to do so in the near future - a lens with appropriate coverage really does make far more sense (and for a superzoom, that means something like a 28-300mm).

Optical Stabilization

The 18-250mm features Sigma's own 'Optical Stabilization' system, and the company claims that it allows hand-holding at shutter speeds up to four stop slower than usual without seeing the blurring effects of camera shake. The mechanism is effectively silent when operational, with only the stabilization of the viewfinder image betraying the fact that it's running.

To determine the effectiveness of the OS system we subjected the 18-250mm to our studio image stabilization test, using the wideangle and telephoto settings plus one mid-range focal length (50mm). The subject distance for these tests was approximately 2.5m for 18mm and 50mm focal lengths, and 4m for 250mm; the test camera was the Canon EOS 650D.

We take 10 shots at each shutter speed and visually rate them for sharpness. Shots considered 'sharp' have no visible blur at the pixel level, and are therefore suitable for viewing or printing at the largest sizes, whereas files with 'mild blur' are only slightly soft, and perfectly usable for all but the most critical applications.

18mm OS OFF 50mm OS OFF 250mm OS OFF
18mm OS ON 50mm OS ON 250mm OS ON

The 18-250mm Macro does pretty well in these tests, although it can't quite match the best in class (the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, which offers almost 4 stops according to our tests). At wideangle we see a bit less than 3 stops of stabilization, with a 70% chance of getting a usable (if not perfectly sharp) image even at 1/4 sec. At full telephoto, it does well too, again providing around 3 stops of stabilization. This is a small but usefull improvement over previous Sigma superzooms we've tested.

Real world examples

The examples below should give you an idea of how well the Sigma's OS system behaves in everyday shooting; in both cases the image would be hopelessly blurred without stabilization. But instead we've been able to take advantage of the ability to hand-hold at slower shutter speeds to use a low ISO and stop down to F8. This should normally give better results than shooting at a larger aperture or higher ISO.

31mm, Canon EOS 650D
212mm, Canon EOS 650D
1/13 sec, F8, ISO 200 1/30 sec, F8, ISO 100
100% crop 100% crop
Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 8

I've had one now for over a year. I love the zoom range, the compactness and weight. It suits my general use photography very well. There are times it is not as sharp as I would like it to be, but there are times I am not as sharp as I would like ME to be. I know I will add a Nikon lens to my kit just for those shots that I feel require greater sharpness, but for now, this lens is fantastic.

The only somewhat bothersome thing is the lens creep when carried nose down. I wish the lock button worked in any zoom position.

Very happy after a year and a half.


I think the Sigma is a very sharp third-party lens, and exhibits this throughout its focal length. It doesn't compare to the sharpness delivered from a prime lens, naturally, but it is impressive, given that these sorts of zooms tend to deliver results that fall on the soft side. This sharpness is maintained across the frame, and is the most evident when shooting between the aperture range of f/4-f/11.

1 upvote
Ernie G

I too found the zoom creep a pain - but I have overcome the problem by simply placing a wide rubber band around the lens at the zoom ring. I know its not very professional but believe me it works.

1 upvote

Can somebody (staff or readers) confirm that the OS on this lens is running *constantly* regardless of the switch being on or off? I purchased one yesterday after using the older 18-200 (where it engages the OS on focus and disengages after a few seconds) and I feel irritated that this is constantly drawing power from the battery. I want to know if this is the intended behaviour or an error in my unit.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting

Good overall performance for me.A bit heavy but it beats the snot out of the Tamron 18-200 I owned for an entire week, Really, should you see lens softness in a viewfinder? Mind you, the 18-200 Sigma and Sony were no better than the Tamron in similar test shots. Keep it simple: Take a few shots wide open in broad daylight with a chrome bumper or metal power lines in the estreme left and right frame then have a close look. You will notice CR at the edged way more than you will notice some barrel distortion across a photo of a lake.

Slartibartfas builder of fjords

I purchased this lens a few days ago and use it with a Nikon D7100. In general it is a great lens, but I find it worse than the review suggests in 2 aspects, namely:

1. zoom creep is bad. If you like to carry the camera over your shoulder, you need to always use the lock button. Although that button is nice to have, it sometimse gets in the way of taking a quick shot, because you first have to fiddle with it to unlock it.

2. I find vignetting worse than advertised. Although I am sure that the test results are accurate, I found that many of the pictures I took at various apertures and focal lengths have darkened corners.

apart from that, and especially for the money, this is still a great buy.


Hello sir.
Just 4 days before I purchased this lens for my nikon d 7100 camera.
Is it compatible to get great picture quality.
Pls suggest ur experience.


I recently used this new lens on a holiday to Cairns. It was great not having to stop to swap lenses whenever i wanted to shoot something further away/close up. Agree it is not a perfect lens in all situations, but shooting between f8 and f 11 gave reasonable sharpness, boost your iso so that your shutter speed is fast too when zooming out.
I used it on a pentax k5.
I had a simple Nikon camera to use on days when I did not want to take my dslr with me and found having the choice really good.

Total comments: 8