Previous page Next page


The 18-250mm is fairly typical in design and build for a modern Sigma lens, which means a lightweight but solid-feeling black plastic barrel, and relatively smoothly-operating zoom and focus rings. It uses a 'double trombone' design to extend to its longest setting, with impressively little play of the barrel when set to 250mm. As we'd expect of a lens at this price, the mount is metal.

Two large, positive switches on the side of the barrel control the autofocus and image stabilization mechanisms, while a smaller one on the zoom ring locks it at the 18mm position for transport. All three are well-placed for operation by your left thumb while holding the camera in the normal shooting position.

Zoom action / zoom creep

Superzoom lenses, with their long extensions and heavy front elements, tend to suffer from two related ergonomic issues - uneven zoom ring actions, and 'zoom creep', i.e. a tendency to extend under their own weight when carried around. This tends to be most problematic if you habitually carry the camera with the lens pointing downwards, either in-hand or using a sling-type strap.

The 18-250mm does well here; the feel of the zoom ring is impressively even across the range, yet never excessively stiff. Our review sample didn't suffer too much from zoom creep either, at least when retracted to 18mm. Like most lenses of its type it also has a switch to lock it at the 18mm position, which is unusually well-placed for quick operation by your left thumb.

Compared to Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Here's the Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 Macro alongside it's nearest rival, the Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD, both in Canon mount. The two lenses are practically identical in size when retracted to the 18mm position. They also have very similar control layouts, with side-mounted switches to control autofocus and image stabilization, and a lock switch towards the top of the zoom ring. Both feature built-in optical stabilization too, but while the Tamron has a longer zoom range, the Sigma can focus closer. This is illustrated below:

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Macro
Tamron 18-270mm F3.5-6.3 PZD
250mm, distant subject 270mm, distant subject
Macro: Closest focus = 29cm Macro: Closest focus = 43cm

On the camera

Even on a small entry-level SLR such as the Canon EOS 650D shown here, the Sigma 18-250mm F3.6-6.3 Macro feels nicely balanced, which isn't something that can be said of all superzoom lenses. It's notably smaller than either the Canon or Nikon 18-200mm F3.5-5.6 superzooms, and much the same size as the Sony and Pentax 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 models (which both share their essential specifications with the old Tamron 18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro).

Flash shadowing

One problem often seen with superzooms, especially on smaller SLR bodies, is that the lens will block the built-in flash at wideangle resulting in a shadow in the lower center of the image. We tested the Sigma on a couple of Canon bodies, including the entry-level EOS 650D, and never really saw any semblance of shadowing, even at 18mm and focus distances close to the minimum - a distinct advantage of the compact design. Do note, though, that if you shoot at wideangle with the hood attached you'll see considerable shadowing.

Based on our previous experience with such lenses, however, we would expect the 18-250mm to show a degree of shadowing with some of the smallest entry-level DSLRs, particularly older models on which the flash unit doesn't lift quite so high above the lens axis. But again its compact size means the problem should be minimal.


The 18-250mm uses Sigma's Hypersonic Motor for autofocus, and when shooting with the optical viewfinder our Canon mount sample was near-silent in use, and impressively fast and decisive even at full telephoto. It's clearly quicker than the Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-5.6 PZD used on the same (Canon) body. As always, though, it must be noted that focus speed and accuracy is dependent upon a number of variables, including the camera body used, subject contrast, and light levels.

Switch from the optical viewfinder to live view, though, and the story changes. Focusing slows right down (although the exact speed is highly dependent on the camera used), and if you refocus during recording the clicking of the AF motor will be audible on your soundtrack as the camera fine-tunes focus.

Dependence of effective focal length on focus distance

This lens's angle of view widens dramatically on focusing from infinity to 0.35m, especially at the telephoto end. This is a common trait with superzooms (the Canon and Nikon 18-200s and the Tamron 18-270mm behave in just the same way), but at a focus distance of 2m the 250mm telephoto end has an effective focal length that's closer to 180mm. In context, it is worth bearing in mind that long telephotos generally tend to used more for distant subjects, in which case the lens naturally behaves as a 'true' 250mm; and at short distances you merely have to move a little bit closer to compensate.

Lens body elements

The lens comes in Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Sigma and Sony versions; our review sample was in the Canon EF mount.

This view shows the somewhat unusual 'double trombone' mechanism which is used for moving the rear element on zooming.
The filter thread is 62mm - unusually (and economically) small for a superzoom. It does not rotate on autofocusing, which should please filter users.
The bayonet-mount hood is provided as standard, and clicks positively into place on the front of the lens. It's made from thick plastic, and features ribbed moldings on the inside to minimize reflections of stray light into the lens. Sigma has even added a ribbed grip to make it easier to remove.

A white dot on the outside of the hood aids alignment for mounting, and the hood reverses neatly for storage.
The zoom ring has a 24mm wide rubber grip, and rotates 80 degrees anti-clockwise from wide to telephoto (the same way as Canon lenses, but opposite to Nikon, Pentax and Sony's). In typical Sigma fashion the action is smooth and even. The front element extends 71mm on zooming and feels impressively solid when fully extended, with just a little lateral play.
A small switch on the side of the barrel locks the zoom at 18mm, preventing the lens from extending under its own length when you're carrying it around. This is especially welcome if you like to use a sling-type strap to carry your camera. The switch is notably well-placed for operation by your left thumb while shooting.
The focus ring has a 8mm-wide grip, and rotates 50 degrees clockwise from infinity to 0.35m, matching Canon and Sony lenses but opposite to those from Pentax and Nikon. Its action is nice and smooth, but the limited travel can make precise manual focus tricky.

A basic distance scale is marked in feet and meters. The focus ring travels slightly past the infinity position, and rotates during autofocus.
Two chunky, positive switches on the side of the lens barrel set the focus and image stabilization modes. You can't adjust focus manually when the lens is set to AF (or at least, you shouldn't try).
A slightly curious scale on the outer sleeve of the 'double trombone' zoom mechanism shows the image magnification when the lens is set to its minimum focus distance of 0.35m. The numbers correspond to each of the focal lengths marked on the zoom ring, except for 18mm.

Reported aperture vs focal length

Here we show the maximum and minimum apertures reported by the camera at the marked focal lengths.

Focal length 18mm 28mm 35mm 50mm 80mm 135mm 250mm
Max aperture
Min aperture

The 18-250mm maintains essentially the same maximum aperture through the zoom range as its predecessor up to the 80mm setting. However at 135mm it reports itself to be 1/3 stop slower, showing F6.3 compared to F5.6. Sensibly, Sigma has limited the minimum aperture to F22 throughout (at least on our Canon mount sample) rather than allow smaller apertures at longer focal lengths, which would show excessive image quality degradation due to diffraction.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 6

I think the Sigma is a very sharp third-party lens, and exhibits this throughout its focal length. It doesn't compare to the sharpness delivered from a prime lens, naturally, but it is impressive, given that these sorts of zooms tend to deliver results that fall on the soft side. This sharpness is maintained across the frame, and is the most evident when shooting between the aperture range of f/4-f/11.

1 upvote
Ernie G

I too found the zoom creep a pain - but I have overcome the problem by simply placing a wide rubber band around the lens at the zoom ring. I know its not very professional but believe me it works.


Can somebody (staff or readers) confirm that the OS on this lens is running *constantly* regardless of the switch being on or off? I purchased one yesterday after using the older 18-200 (where it engages the OS on focus and disengages after a few seconds) and I feel irritated that this is constantly drawing power from the battery. I want to know if this is the intended behaviour or an error in my unit.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting

Good overall performance for me.A bit heavy but it beats the snot out of the Tamron 18-200 I owned for an entire week, Really, should you see lens softness in a viewfinder? Mind you, the 18-200 Sigma and Sony were no better than the Tamron in similar test shots. Keep it simple: Take a few shots wide open in broad daylight with a chrome bumper or metal power lines in the estreme left and right frame then have a close look. You will notice CR at the edged way more than you will notice some barrel distortion across a photo of a lake.

Slartibartfas builder of fjords

I purchased this lens a few days ago and use it with a Nikon D7100. In general it is a great lens, but I find it worse than the review suggests in 2 aspects, namely:

1. zoom creep is bad. If you like to carry the camera over your shoulder, you need to always use the lock button. Although that button is nice to have, it sometimse gets in the way of taking a quick shot, because you first have to fiddle with it to unlock it.

2. I find vignetting worse than advertised. Although I am sure that the test results are accurate, I found that many of the pictures I took at various apertures and focal lengths have darkened corners.

apart from that, and especially for the money, this is still a great buy.


I recently used this new lens on a holiday to Cairns. It was great not having to stop to swap lenses whenever i wanted to shoot something further away/close up. Agree it is not a perfect lens in all situations, but shooting between f8 and f 11 gave reasonable sharpness, boost your iso so that your shutter speed is fast too when zooming out.
I used it on a pentax k5.
I had a simple Nikon camera to use on days when I did not want to take my dslr with me and found having the choice really good.

Total comments: 6