Previous page Next page

Studio Tests - DX format

The AF-S 70-200mm F2.8 VR II does extremely well on the DX format, with very little to complain about at all. The lens is quite exceptional at 200mm, and merely very good indeed at shorter focal lengths (our results therefore suggest it to be differently optimized to its predecessor, the AF-S 70-200mm F2.8 VR, which we found to be sharpest wide open in the middle of the zoom range).

Sharpness With the lens wide open at F2.8, sharpness is very high in the center at 70mm, but drops off a little towards the corners. It drops to merely very good in the middle of the zoom range, before climbing again to become excellent right across the frame at 200mm. Stop down to F4 and the lens gives a uniformly superb showing at all focal lengths. Diffraction progressively softens the image on stopping down further - as usual we'd normally recommend avoiding F22 on DX.
Chromatic Aberration Chromatic aberration is very low indeed. There's a tiny level of red/cyan fringing wide open at 70mm, and blue/yellow fringing at 200mm (which tends to be less visually disturbing); both diminishes progressively on stopping down. Overall this is unlikely to be visible in normal use.
Falloff We consider falloff to become perceptible when the corner illumination falls to more than 1 stop less than the center. As might be expected for a full frame lens used on DX, falloff is negligible at all focal lengths and apertures.
Distortion Distortion levels are extremely low on DX, ranging from neutral at 70mm to slight pincushion at 200mm (-0.7%); overall absolutely nothing to worry about.

Macro Focus

The VR II's reduced magnification is very evident in our macro test. Measured magnification is just 0.13x (vs 0.18x), which is achieved at a closest (manual) focus distance of 127cm, with a working distance of 102cm from the lens to subject.

Magnification may be lower than the previous version, but on the plus side, image quality is strikingly improved. Central sharpness is high even at F2.8, and flatness of field is much better, with the corners sharpening up nicely by F5.6. The image is impressively sharp across the frame at F8, with minimal distortion and essentially no visible chromatic aberration - pretty well good enough for copy work.
Macro - 186 x 123 mm coverage
Distortion: Very slight pincushion
Corner softness: Low
Focal length: 200mm (300 mm equiv)
Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 6

Can anyone help me to find a suitable lens for my Nikon camera? I use the camera mainly for video and looking for a wide angle lens which is good in low light with VR option and also which can cover wide area in focus. I already have a 18-105 lens.
Thanks in advance.

1 upvote

I like it. Very good lens


If u have body like D800E . This lens is pointless . U will achieve better result with Nikkor 85mm F1.4 or other sharp prime lens and doing crop.Save money , save space ...

Seek Studios

Do you own the 70-200 vr 2? Im curious because I shoot with D800 as well and am considering this lens. What makes it pointless?


That doesn't make sense. Shoot at 85mm and then crop, thus turning an expensive 36MP camera into a 15MP? (whatever) camera. People buy 36MP to print BIG. No point if you're cropping.

1 upvote

Not all of us can afford a D8xx so "pointless" is just ignorant. This is one fantastic lens, on DX and FX

Total comments: 6