dpreview review samples

Photo
12 / 12
Navigation
Back to album
Slideshow
Start
Canon EOS 5D Mark III low light ISO samples:
ISO 102400 (H2)
Viewed 156670 times
ISO 102400 (H2)
Shot with pre-production Canon EOS 5D Mark III, low-intensity halogen lighting (ca 3000K)
This photo is in 1 album:
Canon EOS 5D Mark III low light ISO samples
Canon EOS 5D Mark III low light ISO samples
(12 photos)
This photo is marked as:  Safe.
Camera:
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Available sizes: Small, Medium, Large, Original (5760×3840, 13.0MB)
Captured: -
Uploaded: Mar 1, 2012 (UTC)
Focal length: 100 mm
Shutter speed: 1/80 sec
Aperture: F11
ISO: 102400
Exposure comp.: -

Comments

Total comments: 14
Sdaniella

EV=3.24 or 3

0 upvotes
AbrasiveReducer

Looks like a big improvement. I've been amazed at how my D700 is still usable at 2000 whereas my 5DII gets noisy at 500. Still not sure what ISO 50,000 is used for, though. Maybe if you leave the lens cap on?

0 upvotes
nothsafoto

Although some people are complaining about the fact that these samples are jpeg out of camera with internal noise reduction, these images are far superior to anything my 7D or 1DIII ever produced at ISOs from 400 up.

I can bet safely too that the 5DIII in real world situations will be more than enough resolution (MP) so no need for the route that Nikon has taken.

0 upvotes
100zub

Я думаю,что 5mark3 лучше по зерну ,чем d800.Больше пикселей-больше шум,природу не обманешь.

Comment edited 45 seconds after posting
1 upvote
wingedhorse

From this point on, it seems that Canon and Nikon started to develop in different directions -- Canon decided to stop pushing the pixel count, and concentrate on quality of pixels, while Nikon is still pushing the count (like, 36MP in D800)

0 upvotes
Dalerous

Just wondering..are these jpegs straight from the camera or RAW files converted?

0 upvotes
nanomatrix

Existing Light photography...

1 upvote
Miguel J Princz

i prefer to analize high ISO pictures at low light levels...

0 upvotes
100zub

тут итак низкая освещённость,диафрагма-то прикрыта

0 upvotes
Andy Westlake

...lucky these high ISO pictures were shot under low light levels then.

Comment edited 13 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Ashley Pomeroy

It looks like ISO 400 from my Kodak DCS 760!

0 upvotes
snackwells

Likely a limitation in the EXIF due to byte space constraints. (8 bits)

0 upvotes
Herman Liu

This one is ISO 102400 right? But why you write ISO : 65535?

1 upvote
Andy Westlake

That was a bug in Canon's metadata, which we read the ISO from - it's now manually fixed on this gallery page.

1 upvote
Total comments: 14