Excuse me, impressive you lot say?Impressive is the ISO performance that comes out of the Fujifulm X100 and X10.It's f*cking spectacular.DPreview have their internal applet that allows one to compare final images in columns, just put all the desired cameras toghether in a row, and see the more than clear differences.Fujifilm's X Series are just simply above normal in ISO performance.Keep an eye on the queen of england stamp, you'll see the difference in sharpness/focus on high ISO, and the absence of notorious unacceptable grain.
Sincerely, the hardware might be cool, and the specs themselves, but the ISO is more of the same.Just do the comparison, DPreview's interctive chart applet is just what one needs to compare true final images from different cameras.
Considering the hardware, this is not bad at all. I'm sure comparisons to 4/3 cams will bear that out. My old D90 did not do this well at 6400, and that one was considered to be fairly good at higher ISO's.
I downloaded the original as well. I think that the level of legible detail this small sensor is capturing at this high of sensitivity is outstanding. My D70 and D80 certainly were not up to this level of quality. Not anywhere near it. Nikon did it right. Now let's see the speed.
totally unacceptable poor image quality. don't be fooled by the resized image in the preview.download the full image.
Not that impressive. These pictures look O.K. but not great IQ.
just like you. you don't have great I.Q. either
No ISO posted for DSC_0114?