18-55 reconsidered

Started 6 months ago | Discussions
kriztian
Contributing MemberPosts: 622
Like?
18-55 reconsidered
6 months ago

Hello,

For a long time I have been unfairly harsh towards my kit lens 18-55 wr. I waited and waited for a new lens to come and when it finally did. (20-40) my disappointment where big to be honest. Although it´s a fine lens in many respects I couldnt bring myself to buy it because the lack of edge sharpness. I then decided to give my old 18-55 a last chance. I went out shooting raw like a mad man and then I w

ent home and run the pics through Lightroom 5 wich I recentley bought. And what happend? When I did all the adjustment I could find, like Cromatich abberation, vingetting color contrast, sharpening etc. the result was: I now like the 18-55 wr. It is quite good if one shot raw and do a lot off pp. Here is one example wich is very representative. I focused on the blue beemer numberplate wide open 18mm. I Think it shows what is possible to do with this lens. Cheers

-- hide signature --

kriztian

andy amos
Contributing MemberPosts: 675
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

Sounds like you need to go out and buy a prime! It could the the best thing you ever did for your camera!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
M R Padmaraju
Contributing MemberPosts: 891Gear list
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

18- 55 is quite capable lens , I like it . My pic is here , for you to see.

Regards ,

mrp.

 M R Padmaraju's gear list:M R Padmaraju's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F40fd Pentax K-x Pentax K-01 Pentax K-500 Pentax smc DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
LDBOK
Contributing MemberPosts: 718Gear list
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

I agree that this lens sometimes gets a bum rap, and is actually better than some people give it credit for. Using F5.6-F9 will yield a significant improvement, especially at the wide end. I usually use the 21 or 15 Limiteds instead for the 24mm and shorter range and have thought about replacing the 18-55 for the midrange 28-35, but after comparing test reports to others in that range, there isn't much difference at F5.6-8.

 LDBOK's gear list:LDBOK's gear list
Pentax MX-1 Pentax K-5 Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) MACRO +11 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
SRT201
Senior MemberPosts: 1,932
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

It really isn't a bad lens and stopped down it can be decent.  However something like the DA 35 2.4 absolutely blows it out of the water.  Pick one up and you'll see what I mean.  Best bang for the buck in the Pentax glass without question.

-- hide signature --

Any government that has the power to correct any injustice and level any inequality also has the power to do ANYTHING it wants.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
kriztian
Contributing MemberPosts: 622
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to M R Padmaraju, 6 months ago

ThatĀ“s a good one

-- hide signature --

kriztian

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
kriztian
Contributing MemberPosts: 622
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to SRT201, 6 months ago

I have the DA 35 and I agree but I like the wide angel when shooting street and landscapeĀ 

-- hide signature --

kriztian

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
sleepwalker400
Contributing MemberPosts: 941Gear list
Like?
Prime is much BETTER
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

All day LONG

 sleepwalker400's gear list:sleepwalker400's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Pentax *ist DL Pentax K10D Pentax K-30
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
dpthoughts
Forum MemberPosts: 58
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

It's all about sample variation. There are some horrible samples out there, I couldn't believe how blurry the one is, which PentaxForums.com was using in their tests.
But good 18-55 samples are really good! I remember having started photographing a planar target for scientific documentation purposes with my 40mm Limited, but then switched over to my kit (the Version II of 2008), because it gave just better picture quality towards the edges and Corners (mainly because the 18-55 kit lens doesn't seem suffer from curvature-of-field, whereas my Limited prime does (as many primes probably do?)

The kit's sweet spot is around the 24mm mark, where it seems to perform like a prime lens. The wide end (18mm) is quite sample dependent, and the 55mm end is mediocre OOC, but "OK" if given the proper sharpening amount in ACR.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
awaldram
Forum ProPosts: 10,742Gear list
Like?
Re: 18-55 reconsidered
In reply to kriztian, 6 months ago

In the scheme of things there’s some things that just are.

They'll never be a bad 50 , 135 , 18-55 , 28-80

The reason is because everyone make them so optical solutions are ten a penny and they’re all solid.

 awaldram's gear list:awaldram's gear list
Pentax Q Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA* 55mm F1.4 SDM Pentax smc DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM Pentax smc DA* 50-135mm F2.8 ED (IF) SDM +11 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads