Is the FZ series dead ?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions
inti4444
Contributing MemberPosts: 790
Like?
Is the FZ series dead ?
9 months ago

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Ronomy
Senior MemberPosts: 2,617Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

I don't think so...small sensors will keep getting better and you need the small sensor if you want a small portable super zoom. The RX10 doesn't have the reach that the FZ200 has so its not a super zoom. Its more like a Bridge camera and expensive too. Not in the same market as a super zoom. IMHO.

 Ronomy's gear list:Ronomy's gear list
Canon PowerShot SD800 IS Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
trevmar
Senior MemberPosts: 2,391
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to Ronomy, 9 months ago

A recent interview with a Panasonic manager named the FZ series as a money-maker for Panasonic. I think it will stay, although I wonder what they are going to do to improve the FZ200. Maybe f2.7

Also, don't confuse the f2.8 of the RX10 with the f2.8 of the FZ200. Because of the larger sensor, the bokeh (and the consequent need to focus carefully) is much more prevalent in the RX10.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
sherman_levine
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,616Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

I'm not sure I have the patience to wait 5 seconds for the RX10 to traverse the zoom range

Sherm

 sherman_levine's gear list:sherman_levine's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Robiro
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,670
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

All their best engineers have been assigned to micro4/3. Compact cameras are being neglected. Sad but true.

They could make a killer FZ50 mark II camera by putting LX7's sensor into it and using latest viewfinde, lens and touchscreen technology they developed while building m43 cameras and lenses. If they only wanted to. But they would not. Because they can rob you of more money by forcing you to switch to m43. Sad but true.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Robiro
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,670
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to Ronomy, 9 months ago

Ronomy wrote:

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

I don't think so...small sensors will keep getting better

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
LearningForeverIHope
Regular MemberPosts: 289Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to Robiro, 9 months ago

So the FZ200 is the work of a lesser engineer ? Way to go Junior!

 LearningForeverIHope's gear list:LearningForeverIHope's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm XF 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
GeraldW
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,991Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

I strongly disagreed with I-R comparison to the FZ200.  Just because the RX10 is a similar size and shape doesn't mean they are in the same class of cameras.  If you recall, when the RX10 was announced, DPR referred to it as a "superzoom".  200 mm equivalent focal length does not make it a superzoom.

The small sensor superzooms like the FZ150, FZ200, and SX50Hs are in their own class and valued for their reach.  The original superzooms (think of the Canon S3IS, Sony H1, and the Panasonic FZ7) had fast lenses, small sensors, and focal lengths of around 420-432 mm.  In my mind, that sets the threshold for qualifiying as a superzoom.  They are NOT bridge cameras, even though they look very similar.

Bridge cameras were first seen around 2003-2004 with the likes of the Canon Pro 1, Nikon 8700, Sony 828, and Olympus 8080.  They had a mini-DSLR look, a larger 2/3" sensor, and fast lenses of very high quality.  They were also expensive ($1000 for the Pro 1 at introduction) and very solidly built.  Sounds a lot like the RX10, doesn't it?  They were called Bridge cameras because they bridged the gap between the point and shoot models and the very expensive DSLR's of that era.  In order to be called a Bridge Camera, they have to bridge between something and something else.  The RX10 does that; but the FZ200 does not.

OK, with my rant out of the way, do I think the FZ200 and similar cameras are doomed.  No way!  They fill a real need for a high quality long zoom at a good price.  The compact travel zooms are creeping into superzoom focal length ranges; but they don't have the lens quality or the image quality of the true superzooms.  I do think there is room for more improvement.  Canon does a much better job of processing in their SX50HS than Panasonic did with the FZ200.  In fact, the FZ150 did a better job.  The FZ200 is unique because of its constant f/2.8 lens, high resolution EVF,, and better ergonomics.  If it had the SX50's sensor and processor, it would be a world beater; as it is, it's the best superzoom on the market today.  It's biggest problem is the relatively high price in its class.

-- hide signature --

Jerry

 GeraldW's gear list:GeraldW's gear list
Canon PowerShot A710 IS Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Canon PowerShot G15
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Ronomy
Senior MemberPosts: 2,617Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to Robiro, 9 months ago

Ronomy wrote:

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

I don't think so...small sensors will keep getting better

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

Small sensors with better noise control. Technology gets better and better all the time. Manufacturing processes get better and signal to noise ratios get better.

 Ronomy's gear list:Ronomy's gear list
Canon PowerShot SD800 IS Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Robiro
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,670
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to Ronomy, 9 months ago

Ronomy wrote:

Ronomy wrote:

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

I don't think so...small sensors will keep getting better

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

Small sensors with better noise control. Technology gets better and better all the time. Manufacturing processes get better and signal to noise ratios get better.

Those are MOS sensors these days. They have AD converters on the chip. There can be only so much photons hitting the tiny pixel. You can't increase the number. Physically impossible.

They could eventually develop better micro-lenses sitting on top of those receiving areas in individual pixels, but by how much better? 5% 10%?

There are optical limits to one can do with such a small sensor area. Once the signal is converted to digital, there are no more noise losses. The noise is a result of not enough photons hitting the individual pixels. And those pixels can not be made bigger because the sensor size is fixed.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Robiro
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,670
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to LearningForeverIHope, 9 months ago

LearningForeverIHope wrote:

So the FZ200 is the work of a lesser engineer ? Way to go Junior!

No. From time to time the boss graciously allows 2 or 3 of them to take a leave and spend a few weeks toying with non-4/3 stuff...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Sir Corey of Deane
Contributing MemberPosts: 711Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to trevmar, 9 months ago

trevmar wrote:

A recent interview with a Panasonic manager named the FZ series as a money-maker for Panasonic.

It certainly seems a money-maker for Wall Street Photo!

 Sir Corey of Deane's gear list:Sir Corey of Deane's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2 Kodak EasyShare CX7300 Kodak EasyShare CX7430 Kodak EasyShare P880 +8 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Hatstand
Contributing MemberPosts: 971Gear list
Like?
New sensor technologies
In reply to Robiro, 9 months ago

Robiro wrote:

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

With these technologies, for a start:

Panasonic-Fuji organic sensor

Panasonic microsplitters

There will doubtless be more developments in future to improve sensors. These (or similar) will end up in all types of cameras of course, not just superzooms - but the benefits to superzooms (and other small-sensor cameras) are greater.

RX10 is a non-starter as a competitor to the FZ200, due to max focal length of only 200mm.

To achieve bigger focal lengths the camera/lens either has to become a LOT larger and heavier, or the sensor has to become smaller. Which is precisely why superzooms have such small sensors in the first place.

 Hatstand's gear list:Hatstand's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Ronomy
Senior MemberPosts: 2,617Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to Robiro, 9 months ago

Robiro wrote:

Ronomy wrote:

Ronomy wrote:

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

I don't think so...small sensors will keep getting better

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

Small sensors with better noise control. Technology gets better and better all the time. Manufacturing processes get better and signal to noise ratios get better.

Those are MOS sensors these days. They have AD converters on the chip. There can be only so much photons hitting the tiny pixel. You can't increase the number. Physically impossible.

They could eventually develop better micro-lenses sitting on top of those receiving areas in individual pixels, but by how much better? 5% 10%?

There are optical limits to one can do with such a small sensor area. Once the signal is converted to digital, there are no more noise losses. The noise is a result of not enough photons hitting the individual pixels. And those pixels can not be made bigger because the sensor size is fixed.

Never say never!

Plus there was an announcement this year the Panasonic had new sensor technology to improve dynamic range.

Technology gets better and better all the time.  They probably already can make these sensors better but its too expensive.  Give it time.  

 Ronomy's gear list:Ronomy's gear list
Canon PowerShot SD800 IS Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Ronomy
Senior MemberPosts: 2,617Gear list
Like?
Re: New sensor technologies
In reply to Hatstand, 9 months ago

Hatstand wrote:

Robiro wrote:

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

With these technologies, for a start:

Panasonic-Fuji organic sensor

Panasonic microsplitters

There will doubtless be more developments in future to improve sensors. These (or similar) will end up in all types of cameras of course, not just superzooms - but the benefits to superzooms (and other small-sensor cameras) are greater.

RX10 is a non-starter as a competitor to the FZ200, due to max focal length of only 200mm.

To achieve bigger focal lengths the camera/lens either has to become a LOT larger and heavier, or the sensor has to become smaller. Which is precisely why superzooms have such small sensors in the first place.

DOH!  

 Ronomy's gear list:Ronomy's gear list
Canon PowerShot SD800 IS Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Aberaeron
Senior MemberPosts: 1,822Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

inti4444 wrote:

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

I think it is an incremental upgrade at a different price point. They do make more than one model you know. 

 Aberaeron's gear list:Aberaeron's gear list
Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 Nikon Coolpix P500 Fujifilm X20 Nikon Coolpix S32 +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Robiro
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,670
Like?
Re: New sensor technologies
In reply to Hatstand, 9 months ago

Hatstand wrote:

Robiro wrote:

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

With these technologies, for a start:

Panasonic-Fuji organic sensor

Panasonic microsplitters

There will doubtless be more developments in future to improve sensors. These (or similar) will end up in all types of cameras of course, not just superzooms - but the benefits to superzooms (and other small-sensor cameras) are greater.

RX10 is a non-starter as a competitor to the FZ200, due to max focal length of only 200mm.

To achieve bigger focal lengths the camera/lens either has to become a LOT larger and heavier, or the sensor has to become smaller. Which is precisely why superzooms have such small sensors in the first place.

Still, the number of photons hitting a tiny pixel on a tiny sensor SHALL STAY THE SAME. We are only talking about better ability to capture them and count them. Of course, there will be improvements with this new technology. The question is - by how much.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Greynerd
Senior MemberPosts: 3,563
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

I think you will find the party for the RX10 is for pretty rich kids and probably is a different one to the one where you find many of the FZ200 owners. We are in the UK talking about a £1,000 camera versus a £400 camera. I am at a loss to see any basis for comparison.

This is an enormous premium to pay for what is still only a middle size sensor and with not particularly long reach. The RX10 is very much a luxury item in my view. Lottery win kit for me I am afraid.

inti4444 wrote:

I don't want to spoil the party.

After seeing some footage with the sony rx10, it seems like there is no competence with the fz series.

Don't get me wrong I especially bought the fz200 (continuous 2.8 aperture), but I knew it was an intermediate step until.....

Can the fz series really improve more with that sensor size, i hope so, but the sensor size has it's limit.

What do you think?

Gaston

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Me Tarzan
Senior MemberPosts: 1,392Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the FZ series dead ?
In reply to inti4444, 9 months ago

Gaston, I own the FZ150 and it's a gem although I still drool over adding the FZ200 to my sack of tools.

Maybe I'm just easily satisfied, but the 150 along with the Panasonic G1 and the LX5 are keeping me content for the moment.

I haven't looked at the Sony you mentioned, but the last Sony I bought is a BOMB. Water color issues among multiple issues. Made me trust Sony less. I've never been disappointed with a Panasonic.

Cheers, Gaston and happy holidays.

-- hide signature --

Frank

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Aberaeron
Senior MemberPosts: 1,822Gear list
Like?
Re: New sensor technologies
In reply to Robiro, 9 months ago

Robiro wrote:

Hatstand wrote:

Robiro wrote:

But how? You can not possibly increase the pixel size. It is tiny and will remain tiny on a tiny sensor. They could improve the light receiving capability of those sensors by little bit but that's about it. They are hitting the ceiling of what is physically possible. Actually, they already passed it and they know it but keep quiet because people keep buying cameras based on how many megapixels they have.

With these technologies, for a start:

Panasonic-Fuji organic sensor

Panasonic microsplitters

There will doubtless be more developments in future to improve sensors. These (or similar) will end up in all types of cameras of course, not just superzooms - but the benefits to superzooms (and other small-sensor cameras) are greater.

RX10 is a non-starter as a competitor to the FZ200, due to max focal length of only 200mm.

To achieve bigger focal lengths the camera/lens either has to become a LOT larger and heavier, or the sensor has to become smaller. Which is precisely why superzooms have such small sensors in the first place.

Still, the number of photons hitting a tiny pixel on a tiny sensor SHALL STAY THE SAME. We are only talking about better ability to capture them and count them. Of course, there will be improvements with this new technology. The question is - by how much.

Are billions of photons either way, significant? I don't believe anyone has seriously claimed a shortage of photons hitting a sensor, have they? The trick is, surely, to make efficient use of all those photons.

Who knows what the future holds. The trend is to miniaturisation in most things though, packing more bang for the bulk [and the Buck].

 Aberaeron's gear list:Aberaeron's gear list
Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 Nikon Coolpix P500 Fujifilm X20 Nikon Coolpix S32 +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads