"I am selling my Nikon gear"

Started 10 months ago | Discussions
57even
Senior MemberPosts: 5,825Gear list
Like?
Re: Horses for courses ...
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

bigpigbig wrote:

I think you and I have similar thoughts on this. I too hope that one day the Fuji X system can replace my heavy DSLR.

As far as image quality goes, it is there already.

But...

Two things I am not sure CAN / WILL ever happen (I REALLY hope I am wrong)

1) Mirrorless AF can not match the speed a dedicated AF sensor separate from the imaging sensor. Seems like a physical limitation.

Not at all. How its implemented is mainly an issue of lens mechanics and processing speed. With PDAF on the sensor, it's likely to match or exceed SLRs in both accuracy and speed.

 57even's gear list:57even's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
wazu
Senior MemberPosts: 1,157
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to Gooutside, 10 months ago

Gooutside wrote:

I think a lot of amateur photographers, myself included only want to have one system. It simply feels wasteful to have two.

Wasteful with two systems? Heck I have four and am salivating at the prospect of a FF MILC like the A7/7r series is delivering.

1. FF DSLRs ultimate IQ and AF speed with incredible lens choices

2. APS-C DSLRs for extra reach and flexibility (swivel screen)

3. mFT for travel and IQ touching on APS-C ability (EM5)

4. compact high end cameras for ultimate carry anywhere convenience (RX-1 RX-100 LX5)

All above formats fill a specific niche and I would be hard pressed to reduce it even three systems.

Notice I am missing Life cameras, Phone cameras, bridge cameras, FF MILC and medium format.

I do have camera phones but they are used only for taking reference photos with. Sometimes however even a high end phone camera is useful when cameras are banned but everybody is allowed to snap away with their phone.

Now that I think of it more there's 3D, Heat sensor, IR, Astro, High Speed, Video, Lytro, Action and plenty more types of specialized cameras.

-- hide signature --

There is a crack in everything That's how the light gets in. - Leonard Cohen

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
bigpigbig
Senior MemberPosts: 1,593Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to wazu, 10 months ago

wazu wrote:

Gooutside wrote:

I think a lot of amateur photographers, myself included only want to have one system. It simply feels wasteful to have two.

Wasteful with two systems? Heck I have four and am salivating at the prospect of a FF MILC like the A7/7r series is delivering.

1. FF DSLRs ultimate IQ and AF speed with incredible lens choices

2. APS-C DSLRs for extra reach and flexibility (swivel screen)

3. mFT for travel and IQ touching on APS-C ability (EM5)

4. compact high end cameras for ultimate carry anywhere convenience (RX-1 RX-100 LX5)

All above formats fill a specific niche and I would be hard pressed to reduce it even three systems.

Notice I am missing Life cameras, Phone cameras, bridge cameras, FF MILC and medium format.

I do have camera phones but they are used only for taking reference photos with. Sometimes however even a high end phone camera is useful when cameras are banned but everybody is allowed to snap away with their phone.

Now that I think of it more there's 3D, Heat sensor, IR, Astro, High Speed, Video, Lytro, Action and plenty more types of specialized cameras.

-- hide signature --

There is a crack in everything That's how the light gets in. - Leonard Cohen

Yup.

Nothing like an 8x10 negative enlarged to 16x20 for a Palladium print.

 bigpigbig's gear list:bigpigbig's gear list
Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Absolutic
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,713Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

I have three systems (Nikon FF, Fuji X, and m43).  On occasions I had more but I kept trying to get it down to one system.  At the end I gave up.

What I do try is to not to duplicate the same focal length if possible in each system.    For example I have an excellent 35/1.4 for Fuji.   That means I won't be buying a 25/1.4 Panaleica for m43 for example.   I have a 7-14 Panasonic for m43.  Which means I won't be buying Fuji 10-24 when it comes out.      I will be, however, buying 56/1.2 when it comes out since I currently don't have anything similar in such focal length and I shoot a lot of portraits.

 Absolutic's gear list:Absolutic's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Fujifilm X-T1 Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Klaus dk
Senior MemberPosts: 2,323Gear list
Like?
Wasteful?
In reply to Gooutside, 10 months ago

Gooutside wrote:

I think a lot of amateur photographers, myself included only want to have one system. It simply feels wasteful to have two.

Most people have more than one pair of shoes, most people have both cups-and-saucers and mugs for their coffee or tea, most DYI people have both PZ and flat screwdrivers - and torx, philips and unbraco. Why would having more than one system for photography be wasteful?

I have three different shooting focus areas: portraits, events and holidays. My DSLR works for the first and second type, for holidays I carry a compact.

 Klaus dk's gear list:Klaus dk's gear list
Canon PowerShot S100 Canon EOS 7D Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
bigpigbig
Senior MemberPosts: 1,593Gear list
Like?
Re: Horses for courses ...
In reply to 57even, 10 months ago

57even wrote:

bigpigbig wrote:

I think you and I have similar thoughts on this. I too hope that one day the Fuji X system can replace my heavy DSLR.

As far as image quality goes, it is there already.

But...

Two things I am not sure CAN / WILL ever happen (I REALLY hope I am wrong)

1) Mirrorless AF can not match the speed a dedicated AF sensor separate from the imaging sensor. Seems like a physical limitation.

Not at all. How its implemented is mainly an issue of lens mechanics and processing speed. With PDAF on the sensor, it's likely to match or exceed SLRs in both accuracy and speed.

I mis-wrote. I meant to say tracking during AF-C shooting will never be as fast.

The way I understand it, the DSLR has two sensors, one for image capture and one for focusing. The mirroless camera can not focus while capturing an image, the DSLR can not focus while the mirror is up. But, the mirror returns faster than the mirrorless camera can switch from capture for focus.

I could be wrong. I hope I am.

 bigpigbig's gear list:bigpigbig's gear list
Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Daniel Lauring
Veteran MemberPosts: 7,473Gear list
Like?
Re: Horses for courses ...
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

bigpigbig wrote:

I mis-wrote. I meant to say tracking during AF-C shooting will never be as fast.

The way I understand it, the DSLR has two sensors, one for image capture and one for focusing. The mirroless camera can not focus while capturing an image, the DSLR can not focus while the mirror is up. But, the mirror returns faster than the mirrorless camera can switch from capture for focus.

I could be wrong. I hope I am.

The SLR has a separate lower resolution sensor that can be read faster but that yields its own issues.  For one thing, since it's on a different path it needs to be "tuned" the other sensor and to the lens.  Two, because it has less pixels it can't be as intelligent and has limits to face recognition and ability to focus on say the closest eye.

Computers keep getting faster and engineers are figuring out ways to get the data off higher resolution sensors faster.  I suspect someday these advances will make mirrorless cameras as fast as today's SLR's.  The Olympus E-M1 is amazingly fast...nearly SLR like.  Give it a few more years.

 Daniel Lauring's gear list:Daniel Lauring's gear list
Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
bigpigbig
Senior MemberPosts: 1,593Gear list
Like?
Re: Horses for courses ...
In reply to Daniel Lauring, 10 months ago

Daniel Lauring wrote:

bigpigbig wrote:

I mis-wrote. I meant to say tracking during AF-C shooting will never be as fast.

The way I understand it, the DSLR has two sensors, one for image capture and one for focusing. The mirroless camera can not focus while capturing an image, the DSLR can not focus while the mirror is up. But, the mirror returns faster than the mirrorless camera can switch from capture for focus.

I could be wrong. I hope I am.

The SLR has a separate lower resolution sensor that can be read faster but that yields its own issues. For one thing, since it's on a different path it needs to be "tuned" the other sensor and to the lens. Two, because it has less pixels it can't be as intelligent and has limits to face recognition and ability to focus on say the closest eye.

Computers keep getting faster and engineers are figuring out ways to get the data off higher resolution sensors faster. I suspect someday these advances will make mirrorless cameras as fast as today's SLR's. The Olympus E-M1 is amazingly fast...nearly SLR like. Give it a few more years.

You are probably right. I'll celebrate when it happens.

 bigpigbig's gear list:bigpigbig's gear list
Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
davids8560
Contributing MemberPosts: 561Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

I have two DSLRs, one MILC, and about 55 other various cameras. Frankly I just got 'em because dpreview said they were good cameras, and because I found most of them used at a great discount on eBay.

Mostly my cameras all just sit around. Five of them, my "primary" cameras, are on the shelf near my desk. The rest are stored away in a closet. I don't know all that much about photography. I just like cameras. I suppose I'm sort of an accidental camera museum curator.

I've managed to round up a few really great cameras. The latest is a Pentax K-5. I also have a T3i, a NEX-7, a RX100, a XZ-1, and the tiny TL350. I also happen to think highly of my F770EXR, for its size, capability, and unwashed-out skies.

Some of the better older cameras I've used are the D70, the XTi, the Pro1, the C8080, and the V3. Sometimes. while scrolling through my pics in Lightroom, it often seems the D70 shots look the best. I used the D70 with a Nikkor F4 70-210, and the pictures that combo produced really stand out to me. I also think Nikon's color rendition is truer than any of the other cameras I've used. But at the time, I found the D70 with a big lens a rather cumbersome proposition, and it was not a camera I picked up freely very often. I think at the time I used my Canon S3 IS most of the time! And one day I let the D70 go...

So, at least until only very recently, the things that have drawn me to actually pick up and use any camera in particular have been zoom reach, convenient size, and the availability of PASM modes. So over the years I've used a lot of bridge cameras, mostly Canon and Panasonic superzooms exclusively. And, as you might expect, I am by nature very attracted to the new Stylus 1 and RX10.

But when I go to the galleries and see what you guys are producing with your big, heavy, advanced gear, almost everybody's pictures are quite frankly glaringly and stupendously superior to mine. I dunno. Maybe dpreview will open up a Lousy Uploads Gallery. That would be something. Then I might get some compliments. But what I have discovered, the thing that appears to be for sure, is that one stunning photo from a great camera like a high-end Nikon DSLR tops a bevy of small-sensor enthusiast compact and superzoom shots any old day. And I guess my stupidity is revealed in making this statement. But there you have it.

Lately I've been thinking about selling off most of my cameras, buying some better-quality lenses, and begin actually learning about photography with the cameras I decide to keep. I guess I'll just have to get used to carrying a selection of lenses and a really capable body if I want great images.

I think I'm going to dump the T3i kit, for starters, now that I have the K-5 on the shelf. I really like the K-5, even though it's a three-year-old model. And I want to get some better lenses for the NEX-7, even though it's about to be kicked off its golden pedestal by the new A7's.

So I guess I am saying to the OP, hold off on selling your Nikon kit. It may very well be that its output is about as good as it gets, despite the cumbersome size and weight.

But what do I know.

 davids8560's gear list:davids8560's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Olympus Stylus 1 Pentax K-5 Sony Alpha NEX-7
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Stujomo
Contributing MemberPosts: 945
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

Well I sold my X-E1 to get a D800. I just did get on with the X-E1 and the viewfinder. Still got my X100 though and thats not going anywhere.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
jtan163
Contributing MemberPosts: 968Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

With apologies to all you Fuji folk for pushing my Oly falvoured brand of mirrorless fanboi-ism.
I though this post came out of the Nikon FX forum.

bigpigbig wrote:

I have read this on many occasions. Most recently on FR main page.

I don't get it.

Do you need to get it?
Someone else has decided that something else will work for them.
It's not your decision - the consequences in no way affect you*.

You're still allowed to keep your Nikon FX gear with inbuilt dust stirrer - uhm - mirror.

Or are you worried that the grass really IS greener over there?

Unless you are strapped for cash and REALLY can only afford to keep one system,

why would you give up all the opportunities lost by shooting a mirrorless camera only?

A lot of people may not lose any opportunities with a mirrorless system, if indeed that is what they are switching too.

What can a D800 do that a capable mirrorless system can't?
Tracking AF - and 38MP.

If you don't need 38MP - and really most people don't - and you don't need tracking AF, what opportunity do you lose?

OK a little DR.
Of course if DR and IQ generally are an issue why give up the opportunities lost by shooting MF?

Unless you are really strapped for cash. Most normal folk can afford an MF, full range of accessorise and a D800 for kiddy snapshots and a pair of EX-1s to use as ballast for the tripod - can't they?

Which many people who view photographs - a lot of people that take photos too - won't miss.

in your list there are very few things that a capable mirrorless camera system can't do pretty much as well.

I note also that you have created a list that does have a certain huge DSLR bias.

By which I mean you don't have any "took a photo of a white board because I am too lazy to take notes" or "gosh my cat is cute" "gosh my puppy is cute" "gosh my child/grandchild/nephew/niece/etc is cute" or "this is what I had for lunch" type photos.

While I find myself more and more grabbing the Fuji, there are still situations that it comes no where near my D800e.

For examples:

1) I just shot a dance performance in a theater. I shot a 70-200 f2.8 with VR at 1/400, f2.8, ISO1600 in AF-C 3D tracking for focus. It was dark and the AF system was near instantaneous and capable of tracking for continuous shots. The Fuji system has no lens or camera even close to being capable of this.

No - a mirrorless probably won't do that well.
Though the jury is still out on the EM1 with 43 lenses.
By the next iteration of Oly M43 or the release of the full range of Oly Pro lenses I suspect that will be very little in the realm of AF tracking that mirrorless won't be able to do fairly well either. But right now yeah mirrorless is prolly licked.

2) I shot a focus bracketed macro set of some watches tethered to a computer with live view and remote control.

EM1 and iPad for control.

3) I used the SB900 flashes set up in two groups and controlled them (power and ratio) all from the camera as well as getting excellent results from them in TTL auto mode.

If you mean flash control by CLS the yeah any recent high-ish end M43 can do that.
The Oly flashes admitedly have lower GNs though.

However this is a matter of degrees - even with higher GNs of say SB910s, there's only so far you can go with CLS.

4) I had my Fuji at a waterfall and couldn't get the shot my friend who had a weatherproofed 5D MKII got.

Try and EM5 or EM1.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9Omqui0SoI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHb2yo0PZsA

I've looked but I have not seen an equivalent D800 video.
I have seen somewhat more "timid" D600 videos though, so the D800, can maybe match the Olys for weatherproofing, but I suspect you'd need to go to D3/D4 to get similar to the EM1 standard.

I probably wouldn't go there with an XPro1 or X100 either.

5) I often find myself cropping a 6mp image and printing an 8x10 from very small details in the original shot.

Just carry a lens that has the reach you need and compose your shot.
Oh yeah - you'd need a porter to do that with an FF camera.

Just by the way - Oly has an SHG 300mm constant ƒ/2.8 about the same size as the Nikon, but with equivalent 600mm reach.
How big is Nikon's 600mm ƒ/2.8?
Dang - there isn't one, is there?

Oh yeah I'm not 100% sure but I think the 1.4x tele fits it too.

6) A bear was chasing me and I threw the D800e and 200 f2 at it to scare it off. The camera was better off than the bear.

As is often the case with "...I don't understand why people don't shoot the same gear as me..." folks, sounds like you have more money than sense.
That's both a good thing and a compliment.
But I'm not sure I'd bet on you for a longevity competition.

In any case, as much as I love the Fuji XE-1 (and will love the XE-2 even more) it is NOT a replacement for a DSLR in every case.

Though, I do smile every time when I pick up my backpack with two XE-1's (one infrared) and 5 lenses, filters, cleaning tools, small tripod, etc and it weighs less than the D800e with grip and 200 f2.

Yeah I smile when I go out with my EM5 round my neck, 2 spare lenses in pockets and a pocket tripod.
I don't have an FX camera but going out with the DX equivalent -well that's why my D7000 only comes out for certain events.

And last time I was at the cricket I shot about 15 raws in under a second and got a great series of some batsmen going down on one knee for a sweep shot.

Look I'd like an FX camera and lens set - and yeah DSLRs do have some advantages, but in reality for most folks you lose nothing by not having one.

Hey - horses for courses - your system works for you - but for a lot of people who don't need AF tracking and aren't shooting for billboards a mirrorless system is just fine - and maybe can do some things a high end FX can't.

PS
You left out shallow DOF shots - every one who knocks mirrorless brings up that ol' chestnut - though I guess the new Sonys kinda shoot that down too - or would if there were a few more lenses for them.

* Goverment Warning
Consequences of large numbers of camera users abandoning high end FF flapping mirrors may effect you.

In the long term a move to mirrorless - even in pro level FF cameras seems inevitable and we probably need to deal with that emotionally - the sooner we start doing so, the less the hurt will be.

All those turncoats cowards who are abandoning the faith may encourage camera makers to accelerate the move toward mirrorless systems. On the upside you'll either be able to buy all the D800s you want for $50 at the local pawn shop like you can with film cameras - or the price will go through the roof and yours will be that much more valuable.

 jtan163's gear list:jtan163's gear list
Olympus C-740 UZ Nikon D7000 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G +13 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Red5TX
Senior MemberPosts: 1,586
Like?
Re: Wasteful?
In reply to Klaus dk, 10 months ago

Klaus dk wrote:

Gooutside wrote:

I think a lot of amateur photographers, myself included only want to have one system. It simply feels wasteful to have two.

Most people have more than one pair of shoes, most people have both cups-and-saucers and mugs for their coffee or tea, most DYI people have both PZ and flat screwdrivers - and torx, philips and unbraco. Why would having more than one system for photography be wasteful?

Because camera systems are priced closer to cars than shoes, and most people only have one car.  If I could buy complete camera systems for $150, I would own five or six.  For $3,000, the math leads me to a different conclusion.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
bigpigbig
Senior MemberPosts: 1,593Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to jtan163, 10 months ago

jtan163 wrote:

With apologies to all you Fuji folk for pushing my Oly falvoured brand of mirrorless fanboi-ism.
I though this post came out of the Nikon FX forum.

bigpigbig wrote:

I have read this on many occasions. Most recently on FR main page.

I don't get it.

Do you need to get it?
Someone else has decided that something else will work for them.
It's not your decision - the consequences in no way affect you*.

You're still allowed to keep your Nikon FX gear with inbuilt dust stirrer - uhm - mirror.

Or are you worried that the grass really IS greener over there?

Unless you are strapped for cash and REALLY can only afford to keep one system,

why would you give up all the opportunities lost by shooting a mirrorless camera only?

A lot of people may not lose any opportunities with a mirrorless system, if indeed that is what they are switching too.

What can a D800 do that a capable mirrorless system can't?
Tracking AF - and 38MP.

If you don't need 38MP - and really most people don't - and you don't need tracking AF, what opportunity do you lose?

OK a little DR.
Of course if DR and IQ generally are an issue why give up the opportunities lost by shooting MF?

Unless you are really strapped for cash. Most normal folk can afford an MF, full range of accessorise and a D800 for kiddy snapshots and a pair of EX-1s to use as ballast for the tripod - can't they?

Which many people who view photographs - a lot of people that take photos too - won't miss.

in your list there are very few things that a capable mirrorless camera system can't do pretty much as well.

I note also that you have created a list that does have a certain huge DSLR bias.

By which I mean you don't have any "took a photo of a white board because I am too lazy to take notes" or "gosh my cat is cute" "gosh my puppy is cute" "gosh my child/grandchild/nephew/niece/etc is cute" or "this is what I had for lunch" type photos.

While I find myself more and more grabbing the Fuji, there are still situations that it comes no where near my D800e.

For examples:

1) I just shot a dance performance in a theater. I shot a 70-200 f2.8 with VR at 1/400, f2.8, ISO1600 in AF-C 3D tracking for focus. It was dark and the AF system was near instantaneous and capable of tracking for continuous shots. The Fuji system has no lens or camera even close to being capable of this.

No - a mirrorless probably won't do that well.
Though the jury is still out on the EM1 with 43 lenses.
By the next iteration of Oly M43 or the release of the full range of Oly Pro lenses I suspect that will be very little in the realm of AF tracking that mirrorless won't be able to do fairly well either. But right now yeah mirrorless is prolly licked.

2) I shot a focus bracketed macro set of some watches tethered to a computer with live view and remote control.

EM1 and iPad for control.

3) I used the SB900 flashes set up in two groups and controlled them (power and ratio) all from the camera as well as getting excellent results from them in TTL auto mode.

If you mean flash control by CLS the yeah any recent high-ish end M43 can do that.
The Oly flashes admitedly have lower GNs though.

However this is a matter of degrees - even with higher GNs of say SB910s, there's only so far you can go with CLS.

4) I had my Fuji at a waterfall and couldn't get the shot my friend who had a weatherproofed 5D MKII got.

Try and EM5 or EM1.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9Omqui0SoI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHb2yo0PZsA

I've looked but I have not seen an equivalent D800 video.
I have seen somewhat more "timid" D600 videos though, so the D800, can maybe match the Olys for weatherproofing, but I suspect you'd need to go to D3/D4 to get similar to the EM1 standard.

I probably wouldn't go there with an XPro1 or X100 either.

5) I often find myself cropping a 6mp image and printing an 8x10 from very small details in the original shot.

Just carry a lens that has the reach you need and compose your shot.
Oh yeah - you'd need a porter to do that with an FF camera.

Just by the way - Oly has an SHG 300mm constant ƒ/2.8 about the same size as the Nikon, but with equivalent 600mm reach.
How big is Nikon's 600mm ƒ/2.8?
Dang - there isn't one, is there?

Oh yeah I'm not 100% sure but I think the 1.4x tele fits it too.

6) A bear was chasing me and I threw the D800e and 200 f2 at it to scare it off. The camera was better off than the bear.

As is often the case with "...I don't understand why people don't shoot the same gear as me..." folks, sounds like you have more money than sense.
That's both a good thing and a compliment.
But I'm not sure I'd bet on you for a longevity competition.

In any case, as much as I love the Fuji XE-1 (and will love the XE-2 even more) it is NOT a replacement for a DSLR in every case.

Though, I do smile every time when I pick up my backpack with two XE-1's (one infrared) and 5 lenses, filters, cleaning tools, small tripod, etc and it weighs less than the D800e with grip and 200 f2.

Yeah I smile when I go out with my EM5 round my neck, 2 spare lenses in pockets and a pocket tripod.
I don't have an FX camera but going out with the DX equivalent -well that's why my D7000 only comes out for certain events.

And last time I was at the cricket I shot about 15 raws in under a second and got a great series of some batsmen going down on one knee for a sweep shot.

Look I'd like an FX camera and lens set - and yeah DSLRs do have some advantages, but in reality for most folks you lose nothing by not having one.

Hey - horses for courses - your system works for you - but for a lot of people who don't need AF tracking and aren't shooting for billboards a mirrorless system is just fine - and maybe can do some things a high end FX can't.

PS
You left out shallow DOF shots - every one who knocks mirrorless brings up that ol' chestnut - though I guess the new Sonys kinda shoot that down too - or would if there were a few more lenses for them.

* Goverment Warning
Consequences of large numbers of camera users abandoning high end FF flapping mirrors may effect you.

In the long term a move to mirrorless - even in pro level FF cameras seems inevitable and we probably need to deal with that emotionally - the sooner we start doing so, the less the hurt will be.

All those turncoats cowards who are abandoning the faith may encourage camera makers to accelerate the move toward mirrorless systems. On the upside you'll either be able to buy all the D800s you want for $50 at the local pawn shop like you can with film cameras - or the price will go through the roof and yours will be that much more valuable.

Humor, back handed compliments and concurrence.

Hmmm. Not sure where you are coming from.

I am not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I love having the option of multiple systems (as many others in this thread do) and I was simply stating my reasons for liking to have one foot in each set.

BTW, it sounds and looks like the Olys have a huge jump on Fuji. I had an EPL-1 and loved it.

Also, I teach photography for a living (and sell some images for extra cash as well) so your "more money than sense" comment is just wrong and offensive.

You should try to be a bit more personable in your writing. If you talked like that to people face to face,  I doubt you'd have many friends.

 bigpigbig's gear list:bigpigbig's gear list
Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Asylum Photo
Senior MemberPosts: 1,277Gear list
Like?
Re: Wasteful?
In reply to Klaus dk, 10 months ago

Klaus dk wrote:

Gooutside wrote:

I think a lot of amateur photographers, myself included only want to have one system. It simply feels wasteful to have two.

Most people have more than one pair of shoes, most people have both cups-and-saucers and mugs for their coffee or tea, most DYI people have both PZ and flat screwdrivers - and torx, philips and unbraco. Why would having more than one system for photography be wasteful?

I have three different shooting focus areas: portraits, events and holidays. My DSLR works for the first and second type, for holidays I carry a compact.

Because shoes, tools and dinnerware are closer to "needs" than camera systems are, at least for amateurs. Not to mention, significantly cheaper.

-- hide signature --
 Asylum Photo's gear list:Asylum Photo's gear list
Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
57even
Senior MemberPosts: 5,825Gear list
Like?
Re: Horses for courses ...
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

bigpigbig wrote:

57even wrote:

bigpigbig wrote:

I think you and I have similar thoughts on this. I too hope that one day the Fuji X system can replace my heavy DSLR.

As far as image quality goes, it is there already.

But...

Two things I am not sure CAN / WILL ever happen (I REALLY hope I am wrong)

1) Mirrorless AF can not match the speed a dedicated AF sensor separate from the imaging sensor. Seems like a physical limitation.

Not at all. How its implemented is mainly an issue of lens mechanics and processing speed. With PDAF on the sensor, it's likely to match or exceed SLRs in both accuracy and speed.

I mis-wrote. I meant to say tracking during AF-C shooting will never be as fast.

Sure it will, in time. Not a theoretical problem, in fact when they manage to implement a global shutter (all electronic, no curtain) you should be able to get a continuous live feed as well (like a video camera).

The way I understand it, the DSLR has two sensors, one for image capture and one for focusing. The mirroless camera can not focus while capturing an image, the DSLR can not focus while the mirror is up. But, the mirror returns faster than the mirrorless camera can switch from capture for focus.

The switch is instant - the issue is readout speed. Thats a design and performance issue, but being entirely electronic, the sky is the limit. Its already possible to get MUCH faster burst rates on CSC cameras at low res, and even quite high ones on higher res sensors. Check out the Nikon V2.

I could be wrong. I hope I am.

The SLR will look like a steam engine within 3-4 years. Panasonic, Samsung and Fuji are not part of the cartel that share the licensing rights to SLRs, so they have a vested interest it outmoding it as soon as they can.

Sony have thrown their hat in the ring too, leaving only Canon, Nikon and Pentax wedded to the flappy mirror thing. When you have two electronics giants up against an office machine company and an optical company, I would bet on the electronics giants to prevail.

 57even's gear list:57even's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
John Motts
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,997
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

bigpigbig wrote:

I don't get it.

Unless you are strapped for cash and REALLY can only afford to keep one system, why would you give up all the opportunities lost by shooting a mirrorless camera only?

You've just answered your own question.

Some people have children and mortgages.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Lightpath48
Senior MemberPosts: 2,115Gear list
Like?
Hrumph! - N/T
In reply to gerard boulanger, 10 months ago
No text.
 Lightpath48's gear list:Lightpath48's gear list
Nikon D3300 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR II
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
carlk
Forum ProPosts: 15,810Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to John Motts, 10 months ago

John Motts wrote:

bigpigbig wrote:

I don't get it.

Unless you are strapped for cash and REALLY can only afford to keep one system, why would you give up all the opportunities lost by shooting a mirrorless camera only?

You've just answered your own question.

Some people have children and mortgages.

Exactly.  Bill Gates would never need to come to this board to check for cameras and lenses.  He just buy everything that interests him.

 carlk's gear list:carlk's gear list
Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 7D Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
jtan163
Contributing MemberPosts: 968Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to bigpigbig, 10 months ago

bigpigbig wrote:

Humor, back handed compliments and concurrence.

Partial concurrence, but yes some of that too.

I try to be objective - even when I don't like the implications.

Hmmm. Not sure where you are coming from.

You're saying you can't see why someone would lose opportunities by selling a DSLR and then list a number of shoots you've undertaken which seem to be selected with an eye to scenarios DSLRs have typically done well and mirrorless less well.

Where I am coming from is that for a lot of people they lose nothing going mirror less.

I attempt to demonstrate this by addressing your recent shoots and acknowledge honestly where the mirror less might not perform as well.

But that is not the majority of cases.

That's where I'm coming from.

I am not trying to convince anyone of anything

I love having the option of multiple systems (as many others in this thread do) and I was simply stating my reasons for liking to have one foot in each set.

So do I. I wish my foot was more in the D800 camp than the D7000 camp, but I don;t shoot for a crust, so it is hard to justify.

BTW, it sounds and looks like the Olys have a huge jump on Fuji. I had an EPL-1 and loved it.

I think they are different cameras, with different design compromises. I wouldn't say the Oly has the jump, but I'd say if you're wanting to shoot some of the areas a DSLR does well in then the  Oly might be worth considering.

Also, I teach photography for a living (and sell some images for extra cash as well) so your "more money than sense" comment is just wrong and offensive.

I assume your throw the D800 at the bear comment was intended to be humourous.

My more money than sense was a response to that comment.
Also intended to be humorous.

If you really did get close enough to a a bear where you had to throw your camera as a s distraction, then I think my more money than sense is valid.

Though I'm very happy you survived the encounter.

You should try to be a bit more personable in your writing. If you talked like that to people face to face, I doubt you'd have many friends.

That's why I try to interject a bit of humour - that's part of being personable.

But FYI I do have few friends IRL, and I'm not particularly out to make more.

Introverted.

 jtan163's gear list:jtan163's gear list
Olympus C-740 UZ Nikon D7000 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G +13 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
bigpigbig
Senior MemberPosts: 1,593Gear list
Like?
Re: "I am selling my Nikon gear"
In reply to jtan163, 10 months ago

jtan163 wrote:

bigpigbig wrote:

Humor, back handed compliments and concurrence.

Partial concurrence, but yes some of that too.

I try to be objective - even when I don't like the implications.

Hmmm. Not sure where you are coming from.

You're saying you can't see why someone would lose opportunities by selling a DSLR and then list a number of shoots you've undertaken which seem to be selected with an eye to scenarios DSLRs have typically done well and mirrorless less well.

Where I am coming from is that for a lot of people they lose nothing going mirror less.

I attempt to demonstrate this by addressing your recent shoots and acknowledge honestly where the mirror less might not perform as well.

But that is not the majority of cases.

That's where I'm coming from.

I am not trying to convince anyone of anything

I love having the option of multiple systems (as many others in this thread do) and I was simply stating my reasons for liking to have one foot in each set.

So do I. I wish my foot was more in the D800 camp than the D7000 camp, but I don;t shoot for a crust, so it is hard to justify.

BTW, it sounds and looks like the Olys have a huge jump on Fuji. I had an EPL-1 and loved it.

I think they are different cameras, with different design compromises. I wouldn't say the Oly has the jump, but I'd say if you're wanting to shoot some of the areas a DSLR does well in then the Oly might be worth considering.

Also, I teach photography for a living (and sell some images for extra cash as well) so your "more money than sense" comment is just wrong and offensive.

I assume your throw the D800 at the bear comment was intended to be humourous.

My more money than sense was a response to that comment.
Also intended to be humorous.

If you really did get close enough to a a bear where you had to throw your camera as a s distraction, then I think my more money than sense is valid.

Though I'm very happy you survived the encounter.

You should try to be a bit more personable in your writing. If you talked like that to people face to face, I doubt you'd have many friends.

That's why I try to interject a bit of humour - that's part of being personable.

But FYI I do have few friends IRL, and I'm not particularly out to make more.

Introverted.

I think we'd get along really well.

Thanks for clarification.

And, yes, the throwing it at a bear was a reference to "Snatch" where Boris the Butcher says, "weight (of a gun) is a sign of reliability and if it doesn't work, you can just hit him with it"

I don't think I could throw that combo anyway. It is too damn heavy. But, the images it makes are heavenly. I laugh at those enamored with the bokeh of new 58mm 1.4. The 200 has that in spades.

 bigpigbig's gear list:bigpigbig's gear list
Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads