Who's image is better, Carsten Krieger's or mine?

Started Aug 20, 2013 | Polls
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
papillon_65
papillon_65 Forum Pro • Posts: 25,114
Re: I'm not sure about whose grammar is better...

TheEye wrote:

...or worse.

As long as you have something meaningful to contribute and haven't veered wildly off-topic, kids off school at the moment and feeling bored teach?

-- hide signature --

667....neighbour of the beast.
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

 papillon_65's gear list:papillon_65's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Sigma DP1 Merrill Sigma DP2 Merrill Sigma DP3 Merrill Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V +7 more
RobertSigmund
RobertSigmund Forum Pro • Posts: 10,750
Re: Who's image is better, Carsten Krieger's or mine?

phaedin wrote:

Since you like bombastic images. I will give you a bombastic critique.
IT'S HORRIBLE. The post processing is so bad it makes my eyes bleed. You have totally lost the original intent of the image and ..... Sorry what was I talking about? I've forgotten

Not one poster here likes Mikhail's version, yet he takes this as a compliment. Maybe he sees himself as Nietzsche of van Gogh - both had no success during their lifetimes, their great impact came afterwards.

 RobertSigmund's gear list:RobertSigmund's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 20D Sony SLT-A55 Sony SLT-A77 +2 more
Karl Gnter Wnsch Forum Pro • Posts: 11,408
Both qualify as unmitigated desasters

Mikhail Tal wrote:

DPR published an article showing some images taken by Carsten Krieger in bad weather that they deemed "great photography."

Both are examples why certain people should stay clear of photography. They both look truly horrible! But your example of over the top editing takes the biscuit for being worse still. Which proves, even from a very bad start you can do worse...

-- hide signature --

regards
Karl Günter Wünsch

 Karl Gnter Wnsch's gear list:Karl Gnter Wnsch's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
aja2
aja2 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,657
Both are bad; yours is worse. *nt*
2
Mikhail Tal OP Regular Member • Posts: 281
Re: Who's image is better, Carsten Krieger's or mine?

RobertSigmund wrote:

phaedin wrote:

Since you like bombastic images. I will give you a bombastic critique.
IT'S HORRIBLE. The post processing is so bad it makes my eyes bleed. You have totally lost the original intent of the image and ..... Sorry what was I talking about? I've forgotten

Not one poster here likes Mikhail's version, yet he takes this as a compliment. Maybe he sees himself as Nietzsche of van Gogh - both had no success during their lifetimes, their great impact came afterwards.

Wrong, 13 posters voted my version to be the best.

Najinsky Veteran Member • Posts: 4,928
Mine!!
2

I can't resist having a play with sick images. I've tried to dial back some of the tone map damage and then express the mood I think may have been present in the original (which is obviously just a guess).

Here's what I settled on:

-Najinsky

Mikhail Tal wrote:

DPR published an article showing some images taken by Carsten Krieger in bad weather that they deemed "great photography." I say the photographs were generally terrible because they looked exactly like any other amateur snapshots taken in bad weather: underexposed, poorly lit, and sorely lacking in contrast and saturation. Here is an example from the article, including Krieger's own caption:

Digital technology has made capturing good images in bad weather much easier. To the naked eye the sky in this scene was a bland grey. Using the HDR technique and applying a digital tonal contrast filter brought out detail and colour.Canon EOS 5D Mark III, 24mm TS-E, F14, 1/13 sec, HDR (+/- 3 stops), tripod.

Notice how out of touch with reality this guy is. He's acting like this is some great image when in fact it is terribly bland regardless of what he did to it. He used about $5k worth of gear and claimed to use fancy processing, yet he's still produced something that looks like an amateur snap. All he had to do was look at the image histogram to see how poorly exposed it is, making a mockery of the term high dynamic range.

To back up my scathing criticism of his inferior work, I snagged the low-res image he posted in the article and spent about two minutes making some really simple edits in ACR to produce something that actually looks like a legitimate professional photograph:

What do you know, an image that actually has some legitimate dynamic range and color in it. Again, this isn't a brag by any means, it's a trivial adjustment that anybody with even a basic knowledge of ACR could have made. I am calling out Carsten Krieger - and DPR - because they have posted several articles by him and I find his photography to be grossly overrated for reasons such as what I have pointed out here. Just another overgeared rich guy who thinks his photos are professional just because he threw an HDR process on that he doesn't even know how to use correctly.

So please vote for whose image you prefer and explain why.

Najinsky Veteran Member • Posts: 4,928
And some brushed adjustments

And here's a second version with some brushed adjustments to 'fix' the unnaturally dark chimney stack:

marike6 Senior Member • Posts: 5,071
BOTH images are HIS...the difference is the original doesn't look like a cartoon.
11

BOTH images are Krieger's.  Swiping someone's image and spending two minutes applying a cartoonish, over-saturated HDR actions to it, doesn't mean it's all of the sudden YOURS.

Second, his image is for an article on "Poor Weather Photography", not "Bright Sunny Day Photography".  It's about context.  If he wanted to make a grey day looking like a bright sunny beach day he could have done that.

Whether you think it's underexposed or not, interesting compositionally or not, doesn't give you the right to create a poll critical of the guy's photography.

When you have examples of own work, images in YOUR gallery, you will then have every right to post them, ask for C&C, discuss various edits, etc.

If DPR has an article in the future featuring some of your images, you'd be furious if someone started a Poll about how poor they are.  Frankly you sound a bit jealous that DPR selected someone else's work for an article.  If you are so convinced that you could do better work, go for it.  Nobody is stopping you.

 marike6's gear list:marike6's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Dedcakes
Dedcakes Regular Member • Posts: 137
Re: And some brushed adjustments

Okay, yours is better than the OP's awful attempt.

 Dedcakes's gear list:Dedcakes's gear list
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Voigtlander 20mm F3.5 Color Skopar SL II Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM Fujifilm FinePix X100 +10 more
Neurad1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,764
Re: BOTH images are HIS...the difference is the original doesn't look like a cartoon.

marike6 wrote:

BOTH images are Krieger's. Swiping someone's image and spending two minutes applying a cartoonish, over-saturated HDR actions to it, doesn't mean it's all of the sudden YOURS.

Second, his image is for an article on "Poor Weather Photography", not "Bright Sunny Day Photography". It's about context. If he wanted to make a grey day looking like a bright sunny beach day he could have done that.

Whether you think it's underexposed or not, interesting compositionally or not, doesn't give you the right to create a poll critical of the guy's photography.

When you have examples of own work, images in YOUR gallery, you will then have every right to post them, ask for C&C, discuss various edits, etc.

If DPR has an article in the future featuring some of your images, you'd be furious if someone started a Poll about how poor they are. Frankly you sound a bit jealous that DPR selected someone else's work for an article. If you are so convinced that you could do better work, go for it. Nobody is stopping you.

Bravo.

 Neurad1's gear list:Neurad1's gear list
Sony RX1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Olympus E-M1 +41 more
Neurad1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,764
Re: BOTH images are HIS...the difference is the original doesn't look like a cartoon.

marike6 wrote:

BOTH images are Krieger's. Swiping someone's image and spending two minutes applying a cartoonish, over-saturated HDR actions to it, doesn't mean it's all of the sudden YOURS.

Second, his image is for an article on "Poor Weather Photography", not "Bright Sunny Day Photography". It's about context. If he wanted to make a grey day looking like a bright sunny beach day he could have done that.

Whether you think it's underexposed or not, interesting compositionally or not, doesn't give you the right to create a poll critical of the guy's photography.

When you have examples of own work, images in YOUR gallery, you will then have every right to post them, ask for C&C, discuss various edits, etc.

If DPR has an article in the future featuring some of your images, you'd be furious if someone started a Poll about how poor they are. Frankly you sound a bit jealous that DPR selected someone else's work for an article. If you are so convinced that you could do better work, go for it. Nobody is stopping you.

I was wondering if Tedolf had returned as a reincarnated chess master (see OPs moniker) to troll us again.

 Neurad1's gear list:Neurad1's gear list
Sony RX1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus PEN E-PL5 Olympus E-M1 +41 more
Costia New Member • Posts: 14
Re: Who's image is better, Carsten Krieger's or mine?

The original image looks too flat to me. It's probably tone mapped/HDR processed. I would expect the sky to be noticeably brighter than the sky even in a cloudy day. Which should make the house to "pop" more out of the image.

Lightpath48 Senior Member • Posts: 3,676
Re: You've blown it
3

First off, the original photograph is an interpretation of one person's experience of weather and lighting. Your remake looks like you're the one pushing sliders like an amateur. You've re-created the scene to look as if it has been taken on a bright, sunny day. I'm scratching my head, as to why you felt you should take such license, and then turn it into an attack on the abilities of someone who was actually there.

 Lightpath48's gear list:Lightpath48's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Reilly Diefenbach
Reilly Diefenbach Veteran Member • Posts: 9,800
Doomed from the Start
4

This image was doomed from the start by inappropriate use of a tilt/shift lens.  It's a geometric mess, and quite unsettling to look at.  Then Photomatix was brought in to administer the coup de grace.  Very 2006.  The OP's further crankage made a bad shot much worse.

RobertSigmund
RobertSigmund Forum Pro • Posts: 10,750
Re: Doomed from the Start

Reilly Diefenbach wrote:

This image was doomed from the start by inappropriate use of a tilt/shift lens.  It's a geometric mess, and quite unsettling to look at.  Then Photomatix was brought in to administer the coup de grace.  Very 2006.  The OP's further crankage made a bad shot much worse.

Agreed. Concurs with what I wrote here: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3535210?page=2

 RobertSigmund's gear list:RobertSigmund's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 20D Sony SLT-A55 Sony SLT-A77 +2 more
domina Forum Member • Posts: 86
Re: Who's image is better, Carsten Krieger's or mine?

Monochrome is best for this image!

-- hide signature --

Nobody has the right to not be photographed or prevent the publication of their image, edited or original, whether they're in the street or in private places where photography is not prohibited.

TheEye
TheEye Veteran Member • Posts: 4,066
Re: I'm not sure about whose grammar is better...

papillon_65 wrote:

TheEye wrote:

...or worse.

As long as you have something meaningful to contribute and haven't veered wildly off-topic, kids off school at the moment and feeling bored teach?

-- hide signature --

667....neighbour of the beast.
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

You have to insert an "are" and a comma into your post!   This not to say your post wasn't a meaningful contribution or a sign of being bored yourself, Mr Butterfly.

Pritzl Contributing Member • Posts: 924
Re: I dare you...

Great Bustard wrote:

Pritzl wrote:

You can put lipstick on a pig but I still wouldn't kiss it.

...to say that in the Off Topic Forum.

Why? Lots of swine in there? 

 Pritzl's gear list:Pritzl's gear list
Fujifilm X10 Canon EOS 70D Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX II Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM +5 more
papillon_65
papillon_65 Forum Pro • Posts: 25,114
Re: I'm not sure about whose grammar is better...

TheEye wrote:

papillon_65 wrote:

TheEye wrote:

...or worse.

As long as you have something meaningful to contribute and haven't veered wildly off-topic, kids off school at the moment and feeling bored teach?

-- hide signature --

667....neighbour of the beast.
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

You have to insert an "are" and a comma into your post! This not to say your post wasn't a meaningful contribution or a sign of being bored yourself, Mr Butterfly.

Thanks, but when I want my posts marked for grammar and spelling I'll let you know. You must be very busy because mine is pretty literate compared to a lot of what gets posted on here.
The topic interested me, if I'm bored I just stop reading and move on, is there any chance you could do the same or maybe contribute "on-topic" Mr literacy?.....

-- hide signature --

667....neighbour of the beast.
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

 papillon_65's gear list:papillon_65's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix X100 Sigma DP1 Merrill Sigma DP2 Merrill Sigma DP3 Merrill Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V +7 more
MPrince Senior Member • Posts: 1,407
Re: Who's image is better, Carsten Krieger's or mine?
1

Mikhail Tal wrote:

RobertSigmund wrote:

phaedin wrote:

Since you like bombastic images. I will give you a bombastic critique.
IT'S HORRIBLE. The post processing is so bad it makes my eyes bleed. You have totally lost the original intent of the image and ..... Sorry what was I talking about? I've forgotten

Not one poster here likes Mikhail's version, yet he takes this as a compliment. Maybe he sees himself as Nietzsche of van Gogh - both had no success during their lifetimes, their great impact came afterwards.

Wrong, 13 posters voted my version to be the best.

Voting that your edit is better than the original is not the same as liking your edit.

I dislike both.  To me, the original is bland and boring, but your edit is so hideous it would make a blind man lose his lunch.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads